serge 904 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 lol the e-mails again. It's like a safety blanket for you guys. Yup. National security is an important thing Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 as opposed to using the term pussy... Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Since the e-mails are now publicly available, maybe you could point me to the exact e-mail that compromised national security? Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 You should educate yourself about the email issue before stating they are all available. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 So Friday or Saturday for the NEW revelation about Trump that just so happens to come out? It will prove he is a drunk/murderer/rapist/kitten hater/homosexual/spy/criminal. There will not be time to investigate, but that won't stop them from coming out with the story. I'm betting late Friday Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 So Friday or Saturday for the NEW revelation about Trump that just so happens to come out? It will prove he is a drunk/murderer/rapist/kitten hater/homosexual/spy/criminal. There will not be time to investigate, but that won't stop them from coming out with the story. I'm betting late Friday huh, so you are saying that overblown stories not based in reality and rushed to press are a bad thing? Without those, Trump would be losing by 15 points. But sure, go ahead with your faux outrage over an imaginary story that could hurt Trump's chances. May as well get as many excuses as you can lined up, it will help you cope with the impending Clinton presidency. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 You should educate yourself about the email issue before stating they are all available. Right, I forgot about you guys clinging onto the "certainty" that there must be bad stuff in the e-mails that haven't been released, since there is pretty much nothing in the e-mails that have been. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,759 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Or those emails haven't been released/recovered. One or the other. You are talking about the John Podesta emails, and everyone else is talking about Hillary's classified emails that were compromised because she didn't care about national secrets, but then cared enough to delete and whitewash them after the courts told her not to. Also she lied to Congress about that and everything else. No big deal. Quit talking about it guys. Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 historically with the Clintons either there will be some crazy story coming out shortly about Trump to deflect - or someone is going to end up dead. Probably the first option but with all the coincidental deaths of people who do business with them over the years - well many people should stay on high alert this weekend, just in case. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Still waiting for how these deleted e-mails compromised national security. If you squint hard enough, you can see corruption and subterfuge in any politicians actions when they don't believe they are being monitored. I see a huge red herring that's been beat to death over the last 6 months despite zero evidence that there is anything damaging or malicious in those e-mails. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 ah yes, the Clinton death list. Another favourite safety blanket of the tin-foil hat wearers. Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 all just bad timing...nothing to see here folks keep moving. Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Dubey, the funny thing is she is going hurt Canada as well...she isn't in anyone best interest. I mean unless you consider yourselves independent. if you do that well LOL good luck with that. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 is she going to murder Canadians one by one until we are all gone? oh god! http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp keep drinking the kool-aid Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,759 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 lol at snopes or anyone else being able to claim intimate knowledge of a situation they were not involved in. That's the exact same position as people claiming that they killed people. One is saying it happened without evidence, the other is saying it didn't without evidence. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 One side is a wild conspiracy theory that attributes every death within several degrees of separation from the Clintons as suspicious and likely caused by their hand. The other is a rational examination of the facts and evidence surrounding each death with the conclusion that the conspiracy theory is just that and likely nothing more. But sure, yeah, different sides of the same coin and all that. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,759 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 But sure, yeah, different sides of the same coin Exactly. Because of this: likely nothing more. likely nothing more =/= FALSE Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 never claimed they were responsible for all. It is an amazing run of bad luck for those who died... you might be better off as partners with the Mafia. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 That is some very interesting logic. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 never claimed they were responsible for all. It is an amazing run of bad luck for those who died... you might be better off as partners with the Mafia. or, they are approaching their 70s, are two of the most prominent people in the entire country, and have a social network that extends to several thousand or more. No, I do not think it is incredibly bad luck that 50 people they were associated (sometimes very loosely) with have died. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,759 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 That is some very interesting logic. So you don't think "FALSE" is an absolute? Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Exactly. Because of this: likely nothing more =/= FALSE this isn't a court of law. As a reasonable human being that doesn't see monsters hiding around every corner, the original claim is so ridiculous that the Snopes investigation is easily sufficient for me and I don't think there is anything ridiculous about that. The notion that believing they aren't guilty of 50 murders is equally as dumb as believing that they are because of a lack of ironclad evidence to the contrary is quite frankly ludicrous. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 So you don't think "FALSE" is an absolute? I don't need to speak in absolutes when dealing with ridiculous conspiracy theories. I also don't have iron clad proof that Tupac and Elvis Presley are actually dead but I choose to believe it based on reasonable evidence. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Let's do a little exercise: I Believe that Trump is a plant strategically placed by the democrats to ensure a landslide victory in the presidential election, as well as the House and Senate. Prove me wrong. You literally can't. You could provide a well researched and well-thought out retort and conclude that my claim is almost certainly false. But, by your logic, your conclusion would be equally as ridiculous as my original claim. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
GOCUBSGO 77 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 *anxiously awaiting Brvy's response* Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now