Jump to content

Daily Fantasy Sports. Lets All Make Some Money


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 563
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Omfg they changed it. I won     Gshhshdhshhshsjejehbs

Scored 154 points and cashed all double ups comfortably. My alternate lineup with Antonio Brown would have scored about 135 and not cashed.   2/2 this year so far

Got a sweat. If the early game in the NFL finishes with no major changes, I win 5K.

Forgot to post my lineup. Not a great start:

 

Tom Brady

Jordan Howard

Jonathan Stewart

Julio Jones

Chris hogan

Michael Thomas

Greg Olsen

Tyler lockett

Bears D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

where's Allen Robinson???

 

Strongly considered it.

 

Pretty much every guy I considered had a huge game except for the guys that ended up in my final lineup. First lineup I made was a Rodgers/Nelson stack with Adam Thielen on the other side of that game.

 

As for the lineup above, I am actually in contention for last place. 2911/2962 currently.

 

We do have one lineup in pretty good shape in some other smaller tourneys. Need a huge game from Matt savage and Deandre Hopkins tonight. Plus Houston defense

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Random ramblings about DFS this week since I'm having trouble making a lineup and want to get my thoughts down somewhere:

 

Final week of NFL DFS. just a 2-game slate, but easily the most interesting and difficult 2-game slate of the season. Rarely are there so many legitimate options in a 2-game slate.

 

I'm sticking to 1 lineup this week and I honestly don't know what direction I am going to go.

 

I've been having a lot of success in 2-game slates by trying to predict which QB is going to be highest owned, and then going with a different QB with a slightly lower, but similar projection, and then building my lineup from there.

 

This week, I'm fairly certain that highly owned QB is going to be Matt Ryan. The real question is how much higher-owned will he be than Aaron Rodgers?

 

I'm not touching big Ben on the road against the patriots, but Tom Brady is intriguing. I just don't know if I can fade both QBs in a ATL/GB matchup with a 60.5 o/u and 2 of the worst pass defenses in the NFL. Typing this out, I don't think I can do it. I think I'm talking myself into Aaron Rodgers. He's the highest price QB in a week where every dollar is precious, which I think will suppress his ownership a bit. He's also less likely to get TDs vultured by his RBs, despite what happened last week with Ty Montgomery running 2 in.

 

on the steelers, Le'veon Bell and Antonio Brown are really high upside plays that will almost certainly have pretty low ownership. Le'veon because his price tag makes it difficult to create a decent lineup around, and Antonio, because Julio Jones is going to command most of the ownership in that price range. Bellichik is really good at gameplanning to take away your #1 weapon. In this case, that would be Le'veon. But given the Patriots non-dominant D front, and the Steelers impressive O line, plus Bell's otherworldly skill level, I don't think you can really scheme Bell out of the game, which means I think they will scheme to bottle up Brown. In a typical 2-game slate, a guy like Bell would normally be like 95% owned. On this slate, it wouldn't surprise me if he is less than 20%.

 

I'm thinking Atlanta passing game is going to be really popular. I'm thinking a lineup centered around the Falcons run game and the Packers Pass game could be really contrarian but have very similar upside to the popular plays. Not sure if I can possibly squeeze Le'veon Bell into such a lineup. will have to tinker around a bit to see. I might be underestimating how popular Rodgers will be. Gonna have to sniff around and see what all the "experts" are saying in the next few days.

 

 

Other guys who will be really highly owned (doesn't mean I won't play them):

Dion Lewis

Jared Cook

Ty Montgomery (I think)

Martellus Bennet (Not sure about this. He's really cheap though)

 

 

/ramble over

 

really wish Adam Levitan, Peter Jennings, and All Zeidenfeld were doing their weekly podcast this week. I need guidance

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is Lewis, Cook and Montgomery will be overinflated. Cant expect any of the 3 to duplicate last week

My thinking is it hopefully creates some value to guys like Blount and Cobb

I'm pretty big on Cobb this week (Adams hurting)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I feel the same way. Love Blount this week.

 

Was all over Lewis last week because Blount was coming off the flu where he missed practice. Plus Blount was going to be super high owned and usage had been pretty much 50/50 over the previous 2 games and I thought their projections were pretty similar but Lewis was cheaper and would be much lower owned. Now, with Blount back to full health, ownership percentage plus price going way up on Lewis, and Lewis' 3 TDs last week masking the fact that he wasn't all that productive on his backfield touches, it creates a perfect situation to pivot back to Blount profitably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do think Cobb will be really high owned though, especially if Adams misses. Though still not a guy I want to fade.

 

 

I did manage to create a lineup with Le'veon and Rodgers that I don't hate. I'll post it closer to Sunday if I end up using it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do think Cobb will be really high owned though, especially if Adams misses. Though still not a guy I want to fade.

 

 

I did manage to create a lineup with Le'veon and Rodgers that I don't hate. I'll post it closer to Sunday if I end up using it.

 

I'm hoping Cook and Allison will be overinflated with the partial benefit going to Cobb possibly. Maybe wishful thinking. I haven't see the salary allotments yet, though

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think ownership percentage is slightly overrated on larger slates, and slightly underrated on Short slates. pivoting from a 60% owned guy to a 20% owned guy and coming out ahead in points is such a huge swing on the field.

 

for example. I cleaned up in the week 15/16 Monday-Thursday slate by pivoting from Kirk Cousins, who was like 60% owned, to Cam Newton, who was less than 20%. Newton outscored Cousins like 32-18 or something, and I had a huge leg up on most of the field. On the same slate, pivoted from Giants D (over 60%) to Eagles D (like 10%), and came out ahead on that exchange too. I find on short slates that the ownership on defense and QB is usually really concentrated on 1 option. Sometimes, it's for good reason and you just have to suck it up and play the popular guy. Sometimes there is good opportunity to take a slightly worse, but still similar play at way lower ownership/

 

On large slates where very few guys are over 20%, it's less important. Especially when you are only playing a few lineups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 lineups for tomorrow. I'm big on NE and Atlanta obviously:

 

Brady/Coleman/Blount/Cobb/Edelman/J Jones/Bennett/Gabriel/NE defense

 

Ryan/Bell/Blount/Cobb/Edelman/Gabriel/James/Sanu/Atlanta defense

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think ownership percentage is slightly overrated on larger slates, and slightly underrated on Short slates. pivoting from a 60% owned guy to a 20% owned guy and coming out ahead in points is such a huge swing on the field.

 

for example. I cleaned up in the week 15/16 Monday-Thursday slate by pivoting from Kirk Cousins, who was like 60% owned, to Cam Newton, who was less than 20%. Newton outscored Cousins like 32-18 or something, and I had a huge leg up on most of the field. On the same slate, pivoted from Giants D (over 60%) to Eagles D (like 10%), and came out ahead on that exchange too. I find on short slates that the ownership on defense and QB is usually really concentrated on 1 option. Sometimes, it's for good reason and you just have to suck it up and play the popular guy. Sometimes there is good opportunity to take a slightly worse, but still similar play at way lower ownership/

 

On large slates where very few guys are over 20%, it's less important. Especially when you are only playing a few lineups.

 

Is the ownership % known beforehand?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the ownership % known beforehand?

absolutely not. Unless you're the inside guy that won the milly maker and probably knew what the ownership percentages were beforehand.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm shocked that Nelson is playing...

 

Can't decide if I should change my lineup or not. Something tells me he will be used as a decoy.

 

Rodgers

Blount

Coleman

Cobb

Allison

Gabriel

Cook

Bell

Steelers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not having Ryan/Julio hurts, but Rodgers kept me alive with a big second half. Counting on Bell being less than 20% owned and having a huge game. Not winning any tourneys but could cash still

Link to post
Share on other sites

Luckily my brother made a lineup last minute with Ryan/Julio/hogan/Edelman that is currently in the top 2% or so of all the small tournaments. Salvaged the day

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Ugh, when will Iowa stop being lame and allow me to gamble away my money on DFS?!?

 

shitty..I ask the same thing every day about the US and online poker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...