Jump to content

Recommended Posts

King Troll trolls again. My bad. I got distracted by the line-by-line you gave Roll_The_Bones' post. I feel stupid for engaging.

 

A picture is worth a thousand words.

 

But anyone who wants to defend the fact that a woman's emotional based response to stimuli is equal to a man's deductive response isn't going to rate high on my "Let's delve into the generalities you want to delve into" list.

 

 

 

Are you a fan of Ayn Rand's work?

 

Also, I think Rachel Maddow is absolutely hammerable.

 

Ayn Rand was gullible and naive. Her entire premise fails to account for human greed and pettiness which is prevalent in all of us and to create a world where you 'trust' those who are in the business of making profit without any checks or balances is silly. I've said it before, the best form of government is a capitalistic one with a touch of socialism to prevent kids working in mines and pollution clogging our streams.

 

As far as women, the first democrat convention I did had so many old hag women attended that I was shocked., whereas the republican convention was filled with tons of hot Texas babes. Unfortunately the hotness factor has dropped significantly at the last 2 I've been too, and I missed the democrats because they can't handle the complexity that is a balloon drop.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You people do understand why this is *really* happening, right? Haha, no. You're monkeys who take everything at face value and don't understand how cynically manipulative people in that business relly

Yes I can, but that misses the point of my previous post, which was that Colonel FeatherFace phrased his criticism of Obama in a pretty racist sounding way, while he was suggesting that he was, in rea

Are you high?   During the presidency of George W. Bush we experienced:   - The worst terrorist attack in our history. - The start of a major war in Afghanistan. - The start of another, simultan

SE Cupp is conservative and hotter than ****.

 

Likewise, Andrea Dworkin was liberal.

 

Say what you want about Fox News, but they recognize that when I want the media to lie to me, I want it done by a hot woman.

 

I saw Megan Kelly at the RNC up close, and she is even hotter in person too.

 

Here's a zoomed picture I stalked from the catwalks:

 

DSCN1762.jpg

 

It's also why I watch Red Eye, they get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did I mention that Obama is going to spend the last years in office dodging the scandals he is facing?

 

Bummer knowing that its all phony and made up. But that's poker politics.

 

Crap too much "cognitive dissonance" to quote through. But you actually know the truth. The scandals are bogus. The Republicans are doing anything possible to screw up the economy and are bought and paid for by big money. Austerity was a scam. Benghazi was a ruze. You are laughable trying to implicate Obama in the IRS scandal, especially after the facts have been layed out so clearly.

 

Does it ever bother you that none of your beliefs are "true beliefs"? I mean, I get that people will twist something as erroneous as the bible and make up stuff, but it must get tougher when the facts are so blatant concerning politics and you will adopt a viewpoint that meets your bias instead of the factual one. You would have been a hit in Jim Jones cult. Probably a captain or 2nd lieutanant or something. I mean, what does it take to cheer on a congress that does every possible thing to stymie the economy, or well mostly absolutely nothing to help it, as the blatent reasoning of being bought and paid for by corporate donors becomes ever more apparent ? And yet, they have so much time involved in putting Obamacare to a needless vote to make sure they are on record what 35 times (?) marking how they are on the wrong side of history yet again.

 

And really, having people put their hand on the bible and swear to tell the truth is pretty funny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As of Monday June 3, Obama sits at 46.6% approval, 49.3% disapproval. He's not only upside down by 2.7% (his worst showing all year), he is upside down for the first time since early September of 2012. Moreover, Obama's lowest approval rating in the past year was 46.7%.

Today's 46.6% is a new low.

 

Now, what was that about his approvals are high because the American people see through the republican lies?

 

It's a shame that your reality is based on things that don't support your rhetoric. But that's life in liberal lala land

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another problem with your make-believe narrative.

 

Interviews with IRS employees have established that the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Internal Revenue Service was engaged in targeting tea party groups and other conservative organizations for unfair levels of scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status.

Rep. Darrel lssa, chairman of powerful House Committee of Oversight and Government Reform, made that startling announcement on CNN Sunday morning.

'As late as last week,' he said, 'the [Obama] administration was still trying to say the [iRS targeting scandal] was from a few rogue agents in Cincinnati, when in fact the indication is that they were directly being ordered from Washington.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can argue all day, but the sharks are a circling, and when Tom Brokaw flies the liberal spin coop, you know you got troubles.

 

*Disclaimer* I know Huff Post is mostly liberal trash filled with distortion and lies, but it was the first hit that came from the google, so I am going with it. Hopefully HuffPost can merit a broke clock designation on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the cognitive dissonance thing is better attributed to you, since it is the problem felt when facts run against your narrative......

 

 

But whatever, I'm rubber, you are glue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you think Issa is relevant and Huff Post is liberal trash it's pretty apparent you are clueless.

 

I love how you made a mountain out of the fact I made one comment about how the majority of people feel about an issue and you went crazy about polls, which you are apparently watch closely since your apparent souce of news is somthing like yahoo and Fox.. I only made the statement because you often imply the opposite, as if liberals are some weird sub cult group with no following. Actually, you are more representative of a cult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, I post links to sources that counter your rhetoric, you post more rhetoric and try to tear down the unimportant parts of the narrative you used as proof for your side.

 

I get that without rhetoric your side has no argument to make, but can't you at least make an attempt at presenting a real argument?

 

 

And saying Huffpost isn't far left propaganda, well that just make the case for your cognitive dissonances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, I post links to sources that counter your rhetoric, you post more rhetoric and try to tear down the unimportant parts of the narrative you used as proof for your side.

 

I get that without rhetoric your side has no argument to make, but can't you at least make an attempt at presenting a real argument?

 

 

And saying Huffpost isn't far left propaganda, well that just make the case for your cognitive dissonances.

It was definitely rogue agents in ohio. That is why the boss needed to take the fifth.
Link to post
Share on other sites

When you think Issa is relevant and Huff Post is liberal trash it's pretty apparent you are clueless.

 

I love how you made a mountain out of the fact I made one comment about how the majority of people feel about an issue and you went crazy about polls, which you are apparently watch closely since your apparent souce of news is somthing like yahoo and Fox.. I only made the statement because you often imply the opposite, as if liberals are some weird sub cult group with no following. Actually, you are more representative of a cult.

RThats a hoot. He references huffpo, and you bring up fox.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Boy, looks like I have another thing to make up about Obama by reading about it in the newspapers.

 

 

I think the bestest thing now is that President Obama is now doing all the things what you mistakenly thought President Bush was doing.

 

Wiretapping American citizens

Spying on Newspapers

He lied, people died

Used the force to the government to suppress political enemies

 

 

 

I didn't much like candidate Obama, but I wish he was in office now to stop these encroachments into our private lives

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and hey, remember that 'successful' bailout of GM that you liberals point to when you want to pretend that spending a Trillion dollars of money we didn't have was a 'smart move'?

 

Well GM really appreciated it. So much that they want to tell others about it, by moving their plants to China

 

He also said the company hasn’t ruled out exporting vehicles from China to the U.S.

"It could very well happen," Socia told reporters after a press conference near the Shanghai auto show. "I’m not sharing any plans with you, but we try to keep open as to what makes sense. … There’s no reason why we can’t be exporting to the states."

Socia said the automaker and its joint ventures in the world’s largest vehicle market plan to devote $11 billion to capital spending through 2016. He said GM’s not concerned about accumulating unused production capacity.

 

Poor little UAW worker, you must learn Chinese now if you want a yob.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And look at who he chose to represent the United States of America at the UN:

 

Samantha Power is married to Cass Sunstein, the very, very strange Obama pick for an early "czar" position who wowed us with his numerous bizarre claims including the wacko belief that animals should have the right to sue in court, that hunting should be banned as genocide, and that pet ownership is akin to “slavery.” But Mrs. Cass Sunstein’s character judgment in choosing her life partner is the least of America's worries.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you are right about one thing. Women still think Obama's doing a good job. So that would make people who support Obama...feminine in their thinking. Something I've always thought.

 

 

It's interesting how you wear your misogyny like a badge of honor. Thinking like a female = thinking like a fool! Cuz women are fools! This is what you're saying here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting how you wear your misogyny like a badge of honor. Thinking like a female = thinking like a fool! Cuz women are fools! This is what you're saying here.

 

So you think that men and women are equals?

 

That's just silly.

 

Their brains are smaller for one thing, then there's the emotionalism which makes them lean liberal. The fact they are more likely to vote for a man based on his looks? That doesn't give you a clue?

 

How about their blind support for a man who cheated on his wife repeatedly, used his position in the work place to get young women to sleep with him?

 

When I see a man who claims to be a feminist, I see a man who would be useless in anything that matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think that men and women are equals?

 

That's just silly.

 

Their brains are smaller for one thing, then there's the emotionalism which makes them lean liberal. The fact they are more likely to vote for a man based on his looks? That doesn't give you a clue?

 

How about their blind support for a man who cheated on his wife repeatedly, used his position in the work place to get young women to sleep with him?

 

When I see a man who claims to be a feminist, I see a man who would be useless in anything that matters.

 

So your "clue" that women are less intelligent than men is that women can be convinced to vote for a man based on his looks? And you don't think men will vote for a woman based on her looks? Really?

 

I have to say I didn't expect you to try to defend the position that men are smarter than women. I expected you to backtrack or write it off as a joke, but apparently you really believe it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So your "clue" that women are less intelligent than men is that women can be convinced to vote for a man based on his looks? And you don't think men will vote for a woman based on her looks? Really?

 

I have to say I didn't expect you to try to defend the position that men are smarter than women. I expected you to backtrack or write it off as a joke, but apparently you really believe it.

Men are smarter than women.

 

It's science dude.

 

Not all men, that would be silly.

 

But republican men...for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A little tongue in cheek maybe? To get a rise out of the lbs.?

 

It's difficult to argue BG isn't sexist. I'd love to see anyone try. I'm disappointed as well...

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A little tongue in cheek maybe? To get a rise out of the lbs.?

 

Of course, to a degree.

 

Men and women are different, they compliment each other in different ways.

Men protect women,

Women civilize men.

 

The need to be equal is foolish, play to our strengths and accept our weaknesses. To do otherwise is just trying to force nature to fit into a non-existent mold, causing problems in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's difficult to argue BG isn't sexist. I'd love to see anyone try. I'm disappointed as well...

 

Really depends on the definition of sexist.

 

The PC version, yes, I am a sexist.

 

Of course I have all of history and facts to back me up, and the other side has feelings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...