Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Haven't seen you on here for a long time, was worried about you. Glad to see your alive and well.

Wouldn't it be great to be able to bring back JFK, Scoop Jackson and Byron Raymond "Whizzer" Whit? Those were the days.

Imnot sure where you are going with this, but JFK would be considered right wing nowadays.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What, you don't like your own posts? Then don't post them! (liking my own post was an inside joke I failed to share with the world, so sorry I did not include you in the joke. But you are in it now. H

So, lets see...I have (1) blown your own arguments right out of the water and provided the links to prove it, (2) proven you do not have a clue and just make shit up as you go far more than I ever sup

Dude, if you're sane, I'm a roast beef sandwich.

Imnot sure where you are going with this, but JFK would be considered right wing nowadays.

 

And if his only Supreme Court nominee Byron Raymond "Whizzer" White been nominated in the 1990's or 2000's he would have been tared and feathered by

Ted Kennedy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imnot sure where you are going with this, but JFK would be considered right wing nowadays.

 

the policies that Ronald Reagan supported would get him called a Rhino today and not a true Conservative or Republican

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Haven't seen you on here for a long time, was worried about you. Glad to see your alive and well.

Wouldn't it be great to be able to bring back JFK, Scoop Jackson and Byron Raymond "Whizzer" Whit? Those were the days.

 

Had a kid, working lots of hours, kinda soured on politics generally. I won't be around much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the policies that Ronald Reagan supported would get him called a Rhino today and not a true Conservative or Republican

 

Smaller government, lower taxes, pro life?

 

Those policies?

 

I think the desire to rewrite history to create a false narrative for the purpose of creating a straw man to paint conservatives as being something they are not is clearly relying on the need for people to not think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you guys ever get tired of having the same pointless debate ....

 

I think I speak for everyone here on both sides of the issue and say: "Nope"

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is really mean. On the other hand, that's an un****able lineup of anything if I ever laid eyes on one, except for Michelle, that pic is just not fair.

 

It's interesting to me how you can't find pics like that of Laura Bush, eyes all jacked up and looking crazy emotional. Or George Bush for that matter. Just boring pic after boring pic.

 

On second thought, that's barely interesting to me at all. Carry on.

 

You should take your computer in to a repair facility, because google is clearly broken on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then. I guess BG made the case for me. Republicans have gone full cult insane.

 

This is actually more 'proof' then you've had before.

 

Which should tell you something....but you won't hear what that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smaller government, lower taxes, pro life?

 

Those policies?

 

I think the desire to rewrite history to create a false narrative for the purpose of creating a straw man to paint conservatives as being something they are not is clearly relying on the need for people to not think.

 

Pro Life I will give you.

 

Smaller Government - nope

 

http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=488

 

 

 

In 1980, Jimmy Carter's last year as president, the federal government spent a whopping 27.9% of "national income" (an obnoxious term for the private wealth produced by the American people). Reagan assaulted the free-spending Carter administration throughout his campaign in 1980. So how did the Reagan administration do? At the end of the first quarter of 1988, federal spending accounted for 28.7% of "national income."

 

Even Ford and Carter did a better job at cutting government. Their combined presidential terms account for an increase of 1.4%—compared with Reagan's 3%—in the government's take of "national income." And in nominal terms, there has been a 60% increase in government spending, thanks mainly to Reagan's requested budgets, which were only marginally smaller than the spending Congress voted.

 

He also raised taxes many time as a way to keep the deficit in check which would get him Primaried by Grover Norquist today.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-22/democrats-recall-reagan-s-tax-increases.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pro Life I will give you.

 

Smaller Government - nope

 

http://mises.org/fre...spx?control=488

 

 

 

 

 

He also raised taxes many time as a way to keep the deficit in check which would get him Primaried by Grover Norquist today.

 

http://www.bloomberg...-increases.html

 

The tax rate was higher when he took office than when he left office.

 

So you could say he accomplished the same thing Bush did...more spending, lower taxes, talk without doing smaller government.

 

 

He also had a democrat controlled house from the 1950s till the 1990s.

 

They control the spending.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Mr. President.

 

 

While attending 1 of 3 fundraisers that day ( this for a guy who can never run for office ever again ) President Obama said that it's now Rush Limbaugh's fault he can't get anything done in Washington.

 

 

He blames Rush Limbaugh for Republicans who are representing their base, for following what their base wants.............

 

 

All while Politico ( a left leaning site ) is pointing to so many legitimate investigations on his administration that most of congress is busy in these committees.

 

 

Looks like Jimmy Carter will finally get to hand over that trophy he's been carrying around for years as worst president in recent history.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bush%252520miss%252520me%252520yet_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800

 

 

 

I’ll make this simple. If you voted for a man who sent over 5,000 Americans to their deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan (that’s not even counting the thousands who are permanently disabled or the tens of thousands of dead Iraqi and Afghan civilians), then was President during 11 different terrorist attacks on American embassies, stop pretending to be “outraged” over 4 American deaths in Libya.

 

And if you really can’t see that Republicans are only pretending to care about Benghazi because they need something to attack Hillary Clinton with in 2016—you’re completely blind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually more 'proof' then you've had before.

 

Which should tell you something....but you won't hear what that is.

 

I hope you realize that just because you post a bunch of false, racist, internet propoganda memes that it doesn't give credence to your contentions, it only further supports mine that conservatives have gone off the deep end. If your rebuttle is posting that Democratic women are ugly, pictures of Obama in muslim garb, and other idiotic propoganda, then well, I think you are supporting my contention. They have gone off the deep end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

429773_559655367401056_545822164_n.jpg

 

 

 

 

Attention all Fox News Sheeple:

 

Obama never said he was going to take your hunting rifles or handguns away. He said he wants universal background checks, a ban on high-capacity magazines and a ban on assault weapons (a ban that every Republican President in the last 30 years, including Ronald Reagan and

has supported).

 

So, when you share these pictures, acting as if you’re “getting at liberal ignorance,” all you’re really doing is spreading an image around the internet that showcases how you–and any other Republican who sees it and thinks “EXACTLY!”–don’t know a damn thing about which you’re speaking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Republicans are the Party of Small Government

 

Big government regulations, they’re un-American! They’re unconstitutional and ruining your way of life!

Unless that big government regulates:

  • What language to speak
  • Religion to follow
  • When life is created
  • Who can marry
  • Who can serve in the military
  • Invasive health procedures on women
  • That we have prayer in school
  • Mosques aren’t built in certain locations
  • Corporations are people
  • The Patriot Act
  • Unions don’t have rights
  • When alcohol can be sold
  • The requirement of an ID to vote

Then those government regulations are just fine. How “small government” of you, Republicans!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Attention all Fox News Sheeple:

 

Obama never said he was going to take your hunting rifles or handguns away. He said he wants universal background checks, a ban on high-capacity magazines and a ban on assault weapons (a ban that every Republican President in the last 30 years, including Ronald Reagan and

has supported).

 

So, when you share these pictures, acting as if you’re “getting at liberal ignorance,” all you’re really doing is spreading an image around the internet that showcases how you–and any other Republican who sees it and thinks “EXACTLY!”–don’t know a damn thing about which you’re speaking.

Funny Thing but most of the above were athiest/agnostic also.

,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Republicans are the Party of Small Government

 

Big government regulations, they’re un-American! They’re unconstitutional and ruining your way of life!

Unless that big government regulates:

  • What language to speak
  • Religion to follow
  • When life is created
  • Who can marry
  • Who can serve in the military
  • Invasive health procedures on women
  • That we have prayer in school
  • Mosques aren’t built in certain locations
  • Corporations are people
  • The Patriot Act
  • Unions don’t have rights
  • When alcohol can be sold
  • The requirement of an ID to vote

Then those government regulations are just fine. How “small government” of you, Republicans!

 

How many more times must Obama pass the Patriot Act till he owns it?

Maybe you should read before you cut and paste

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...