ShakeZuma 585 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 ENTJStrength of the preferences % 673811Fiscal conservative - social moderateChristiansomebody could write a graduate level dissertation on your use of fonts on this site. Link to post Share on other sites
Dread Aidan 8 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 somebody could write a graduate level dissertation on your use of fonts on this site.It has to be something that is done automatically. There's no way somebody can be that lazy in how they provide their percentages and also go to all the trouble of different fonts and colors. Link to post Share on other sites
ShakeZuma 585 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 ok I gave in, I wanted to be cool too.INTJIntroverted 89%Intuitive 25%Thinking 88%Judging 89%Political affiliation: libertarian/anti-hippieReligious affliction: militant athiest (but not quite as militant as randy)edit: ooh! somebody take the scores from this and graph them against everybody's scores from that political test from a long time ago and see if there's a correlation! I would do it but I'm too stupid; unfortunately INTJ doesn't necessarily mean smart. Link to post Share on other sites
AmScray 355 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 I still can't get over just how ****ing terrible that list of ENFJs is.Always had a crush on Lauren Graham and James Garner is one of my favorite actors, but some truly abysmal company there. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 I still can't get over just how ****ing terrible that list of ENFJs is.Always had a crush on Lauren Graham and James Garner is one of my favorite actors, but some truly abysmal company there.Dude, they list fictional characters....They are using make believe characters to help explain these designations.You are putting way too much into the value if these lists.These 'lists' are like these 'tests'..only good for school work, not valid in real life Link to post Share on other sites
vbnautilus 48 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Last time:Introverted (I) 89% Extraverted (E) 11%Intuitive (N) 59% Sensing (S) 41%Thinking (T) 60% Feeling (F) 40%Judging (J) 50% Perceiving (P) 50%Seems these tests are really really scattered from finding similar results.Which I guess is why you said: Or I've really changed. I do feel a bit different. Link to post Share on other sites
BaseJester 1 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Political affiliation: Canadian Conservative - In US terms would make me an independent who these days would find it impossible to vote for most Republicans.I would have classified you as a socialist. What Republicans would you have voted for in the past? Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 I would have classified you as a socialist. What Republicans would you have voted for in the past?I'm guessing, "None," for obvious reasons.Edit: Misread statement. Thought he said "did vote for," not would have. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 I would have classified you as a socialist. What Republicans would you have voted for in the past?The fact that Americans even use the term Socialist the way they do shows how extreme and out of sync with the rest of the World the American political debate is. There are no Socialists that anybody in the rest of the World would recognize as such with any significant influence or power in the American Federal political system currently.I'm too young to have voted before 1984 but going back in history I would have voted for the following most likely.1952 and 1956 Eisenhower1968 and 1972 Nixon - Who was actually a really good President he just got caught when others haven't been1976 Ford1980 and 84 Reagan - You have to understand that I was a massive anti-communist. I wrote a paper in high school for my World Issues class Titled "Communism The World's Greatest Evil".1988 - H W Bush - I probably would have also voted for him in 19922000 - W Bush - I would have voted for him in 2000 but not in 2004 because of the bullshit around the invasion of IraqI'm center right in Canadian terms. The government has a role to play and isn't evil and I've studied enough economics and economic history to know that there is far more market failure in the "free" market then Libertarians recognize and that the externalities are far far greater than most realize and those require government regulations.Edit - If you listen to or read things from David Frum I usually find myself agreeing with him. He's also a Canadian Conservative. Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 I still can't get over just how ****ing terrible that list of ENFJs is.Always had a crush on Lauren Graham and James Garner is one of my favorite actors, but some truly abysmal company there.You must have missed Craig T Nelson. Link to post Share on other sites
Roll the Bones 74 Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Dude, they list fictional characters....They are using make believe characters to help explain these designations.You are putting way too much into the value if these lists.These 'lists' are like these 'tests'..only good for school work, not valid in real lifeHe's just jealous of us fictional characters. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now