Fenxis 99 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 Don;t know if you are aware, but the petroleum industry is already super rich and pretty much in power. Screenshotted for the next time you babble about the great global warming conspiracy. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 What a coincidence that on the week the first Grand Jury indictments have come down (all sealed so can't comment) that anti-Hillary smears have gone to Defcon 2? As the right would say: Trump won the election, move on? Likely this indictment will be a small level player for something unrelated to the election. That's what you get when you panel a witch hunt and go on a fishing expedition. But like Obama, it would be smart not to defend/support a Clinton when the charge is corruption. Best to distance yourself lest you be stained. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 Screenshotted for the next time you babble about the great global warming conspiracy. Never changed a post before, don;t plan on doing it in the future. I've been wrong here at least 4 times. I admit it. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites
loogie 115 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 the real story is these damn leaks Link to post Share on other sites
SilentSnow 1 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 No too much info for a tweet, instead they did a story So while a full on investigation on racketeering was being investigated by the Obama justice department, the committee that approved the sale was not informed of the investigation, The investigation was about the wide scale bribery and foreign agents actively involved in making this deal go through. Spies were deported over this. And the committee was denied any information about the investgation. While the Clinton foundation received north of $140million. No imagine if Trump had been involved, do you think this would give cry for impeachment by the left? Receiving $140million, then not blocking the sale at least until the investigation was concluded? Obama must be so sad that Hillary as going to destroy anything remotely close to a positive legacy he might have had. He's destined to be a footnote because he didn't have the balls to tell Clinton she lost and to go away. Is it even possible for right wingers to tell the truth any more? http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/ For an actual example of blatant corruption happening just this month, try looking into the 300 million Puerto Rico deal that was given to a company with just two(very well connected) employees. Link to post Share on other sites
SilentSnow 1 Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 the real story is these damn leaks I know right? Why can't these loser Dems let winner Republicans loot the country in peace? Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,753 Posted October 30, 2017 Author Share Posted October 30, 2017 I know you don't believe in facts but posting this for others about Uranium One and the reality. What other people are you talking about? There are only like 6 people that even come here, and none of them are changing their minds based on a copy/paste. Wouldn't a picture of her with a rapist like Bill have been a better choice? Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,320 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Manafort was my first pick in the going to jail pool. Flynn was a close second. Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Manafort is a solid choice, the question in my mind is for what crime and when were they committed? also how many total convictions? how any do you pin on Trump? how many convictions go across party? You don't really believe this is going stop on party lines do you? lots of was to gambol on this Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 Hillary spent $14million from her campaign to collude with the Russians to frame Trump for colluding with the Russians. Podesta Group worked with Manafort on Ukrainian deal Almost a year of digging into Trump's Russian conspiracy has resulted in a guy who didn't pay his taxes before he worked for Trump. And a nobody who kept trying to get Trump campaign to meet with Russians but kept getting turned down. Thank you for your tireless efforts working on Trump Re-election 2020. Your assistance will be laughed at. Link to post Share on other sites
GOCUBSGO 77 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 Lol Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,753 Posted November 2, 2017 Author Share Posted November 2, 2017 Lol Classic GoCubs 1 Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,320 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 This helps explain old people supporting Trump. Learning From the Fight Against Lead As policymakers work to curb mercury pollution, they should consider the history of another dangerous metal. According to some estimates, the use of leaded gasoline stole five or more IQ points from those of us who grew up in big U.S. cities during the 1960s and early 1970s, when contamination peaked. Studies show that children with higher levels of lead in their baby teeth do worse on tests of reading ability, grammatical reasoning, vocabulary, reaction times and hand-eye coordination. And the doses back then were massive -- typical kids had blood levels five times what’s known to cause brain damage. In case there was any doubt, newer studies confirm that lead’s damaging effects on children are permanent. Eventually, science moved policymakers to take action. Now people around the world face the same challenge with mercury -- another metal that’s toxic to children’s brains. Do we stall and debate while risking harm, or act with a greater level of precaution? The lessons of the past offer some guidance. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,320 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Or maybe watching panels like this one on Fox News leads to stupidity. Link to post Share on other sites
GOCUBSGO 77 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 lol Finally, a position we can agree on. Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 oh bob...that is a knee slapper. it is not quite as funny as the ones of Von Jones attempting to figure out how to tell his kids Trump won http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/11/09/van-jones-emotional-election-results-sot.cnn or Rachel or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVogLdbfOfQ then there are always Hilary's thoughts.... Link to post Share on other sites
scuudagouch 15 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 another peaceful Muslim goes on joyride...snippet from MSN that conservative site. the man obviously wants to meet the good Lord, whoever he is...and I for one think we should facilitate that for him. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/feds-reveal-what-they-found-in-nyc-terror-suspects-truck/ar-AAun2rI?li=BBnb7Kz Link to post Share on other sites
loogie 115 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 of course the DNC rigged the primary for Hillary of course the Trump team colluded with the Russians it's all been so obvious this whole time Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,320 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 of course the DNC rigged the primary for Hillary of course the Trump team colluded with the Russians it's all been so obvious this whole time yup, the DNC was in Hillary's pocket but she still would have won the primary against Bernie who wasn't a Democrat and still isn't. Not surprising that the DNC went out of it's way to defeat the candidate who wasn't a member of their party. Not good but not surprising. Link to post Share on other sites
loogie 115 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 yup, the DNC was in Hillary's pocket but she still would have won the primary against Bernie who wasn't a Democrat and still isn't. Not surprising that the DNC went out of it's way to defeat the candidate who wasn't a member of their party. Not good but not surprising. I mean, I really don't know about that. Every single person I know preferred Bernie to Hillary. The DNC saw another Obama-esque populist wave coming to sweep her away and did everything they could to stop it. If they gave him a fair shake, I think he would have beaten her. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now