Jump to content

Creation Museum


Recommended Posts

Are we talking about evlotuion or the Bible?Cause the Bible hasn't been changed once that I know of.I mean it's been perfected as new sources of manuscripts have become available to get it as accurate to the original, but in all those 'changes' over the last 1700 years, not once has the message been changed.
Errr, wrong. The modern Bible was shaped by mistakes and intentional alterations that were made by early scribes who copied the texts. Words have meanings and those meanings and intents have changed often throughout the ages.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 962
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I actually believe that, and it's one of the reasons that I've always been a very big fan of yours. You're sincere, and the rarity of sincerity never ceases to amaze me. More importantly, though: you

I looked up that passage and didn't see where it said "salvation is by good works." 14 What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save t

I think it's more like, "Without faith, it doesn't matter what you do." Meaning you can't just be a good person to get into heaven.Regarding the first point, if you're standing in the middle of the r

Does it?Hmm.And does you belief teach that you live forever if you question things?
Theres a sense in which you will live forever and a sense in which you will not. Your questioning of things has no bearing on the truth of this statement, except that it may help you to recognize it as true.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Errr, wrong. The modern Bible was shaped by mistakes and intentional alterations that were made by early scribes who copied the texts. Words have meanings and those meanings and intents have changed often throughout the ages.
The atheist movement is made up of pedophiles trying to get laws changed to molest children.I take it this was the place where you get to say anything you want without having to actually prove it?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Try saying you hate gays.Hate Speech!
...which is protected by the First Amendment and is not in any sense illegal, and therefore does not incur any sort of legal punishment. "Hate speech" is entirely legal, and you can even organize and rally and march down the street saying how much you hate fags and niggers and kikes. It's only illegal if you become violent.So I don't know what you're talking about.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Theres a sense in which you will live forever and a sense in which you will not. Your questioning of things has no bearing on the truth of this statement, except that it may help you to recognize it as true.
Oh good, you will be able to prove this and that will show how you are consistent with your demand that a person's beliefs are provable with a slide rulers in order to be true.
Link to post
Share on other sites
...which is protected by the First Amendment and is not in any sense illegal, and therefore does not incur any sort of legal punishment. "Hate speech" is entirely legal, and you can even organize and rally and march down the street saying how much you hate fags and niggers and kikes. So I don't know what you're talking about.
Not really, some speech is more free than others.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The atheist movement is made up of pedophiles trying to get laws changed to molest children.I take it this was the place where you get to say anything you want without having to actually prove it?
I tell you what, you show me the original and we'll compare it to what it says now, along with the meanings you imply it states.Oh wait, you don't have that do you? You can't say for sure there was an "original" can you? It could have been a collection of stories about the Jewish God that was passed down in various versions and collected later. That, by the way, provided a distinct advantage over the Roman's Pagan gods since they weren't into writing things down (scriptures) like the jews, they simply slaughtered some animals to the Gods and called it a day. Another major distinction of the times was that the Romans were polythiests compared to the evolved monotheism of the Jews.But from the book, missquoting Jesus,Ehrman lists a number of theologically important issues which rest upon textually uncertain passages. To quote Ehrman (pp. 207-208):
"It would be wrong, however, to say - as people sometimes do - that the changes in our text have no real bearing on what the texts mean or on the theological conclusions that one draws from them. We have seen, in fact, that just the opposite is the case. In some instances, the very meaning is at stake depending on how one resolves a textual problem: Was Jesus an angry man? Was the completely distraught in the face of death? Did he tell his disciples that they could drink poison without being harmed? Did he let an adulteress off the hook with nothing but a mild warning? Is the doctrine of the Trinity explicitly taught in the New Testament? Is Jesus actually called the "unique God" there? Does the New Testament indicate that even the Son of God does not know when the end will come? The questions go on and on, and all of them are related to how one resolves difficulties in the manuscript tradition as it has come down to us."
The above are just a few problems. Another interesting problem is whether the doctrine of the atonement is taught in the gospel according to Luke? Further, there are immense textual problems with passages such as the sayings on divorce and remarriage in the gospels (not discussed by Ehrman but addressed in detail in D. C. Parker's - The Living Text of the Gospels) and the Lord's Prayer among others. Therefore, it seems clear that the Gospels are not so well textually preserved as some people would have us imagine and that there exist many variations which have profound effects upon the meaning of texts and theological issues.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some more analysis of Ehrman's book.

Ehrman explains the copying practises of the earliest period and how the texts of the New Testament writings were corrupted as they were copied and recopied. He begins by introducing the diverse writings produced by the early Christians, such as gospels, Acts, apocalypses, Church orders, apologies etc. Briefly, the formation of the canon is also discussed and we are informed about the literacy level among the early Christians. Thereafter we are introduced to the world of the copyists and Ehrman explains how the early scribes copied texts and the problems associated with the copying of texts. It is quite interesting to learn that even pagan critics of Christianity, such as Celsus, were quite aware at an early date that the Christian writings were being corrupted by the scribes and even Origen had to complain about the numerous differences between the gospel manuscripts. Marcion, an early Christian, corrupted the text of certain New Testament writings available to him and Dionysius is quoted who complains that his own writings have been modified just as "the word of the Lord" had been tampered. Marcion, of course, accused other Christians of corrupting the texts. In an earlier writings, "The Orthodox Corruption of Scriptures", Ehrman demonstrated in detail how proto-orthodox Christians corrupted the New Testament writings on occasions. It seems that the early Christians were quite aware that the writings in their possession had underwent corruption and were still being corrupted and they frequently accused each other of tampering with the texts.
Link to post
Share on other sites

So you don't actually have any examples, you just expect everyone to believe that the Bible has changed and been re-written in order to support your position?Okay, I mean its a free country and stuff.But at least you are willing to use a different conditional proof for the argument Ehrman makes about how he 'knows' the Bible now is not what was originally written, without having any examples to point to except; "Come on, those guys were like sloppy scribes and stuff"Its science like this that supports the entire evolution theory.If 10,000 copies from the first 100 years of the writings of the NT are not adequate to suppose that we have an accurate copy of the original text, then I guess you and Royal Tour are right about the Bible.

Link to post
Share on other sites
So you don't actually have any examples, you just expect everyone to believe that the Bible has changed and been re-written in order to support your position?Okay, I mean its a free country and stuff.But at least you are willing to use a different conditional proof for the argument Ehrman makes about how he 'knows' the Bible now is not what was originally written, without having any examples to point to except; "Come on, those guys were like sloppy scribes and stuff"Its science like this that supports the entire evolution theory.If 10,000 copies from the first 100 years of the writings of the NT are not adequate to suppose that we have an accurate copy of the original text, then I guess you and Royal Tour are right about the Bible.
Well, again, give me the original and we'll compare.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Not really, some speech is more free than others.
Only as far as social acceptance. It's illegal to incite violence. Other than that, you're free to say whatever you want about how much you hate gays. I mean, look at Westboro Baptist. Our country takes freedom of speech pretty seriously, and it's one of the great things about this country.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh good, you will be able to prove this and that will show how you are consistent with your demand that a person's beliefs are provable with a slide rulers in order to be true.
I assume I don't need to prove that there is a sense in which you die? It's just the sense in which you don't die that you are interested in?
Link to post
Share on other sites
I assume I don't need to prove that there is a sense in which you die? It's just the sense in which you don't die that you are interested in?
I don't think this means what you think it means.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Only as far as social acceptance. It's illegal to incite violence. Other than that, you're free to say whatever you want about how much you hate gays. I mean, look at Westboro Baptist. Our country takes freedom of speech pretty seriously, and it's one of the great things about this country.
If I take a baseball bat and stand outside a voting booth telling all black people they better vote for the old white guy, I will get in more trouble than the black panthers did.
Link to post
Share on other sites
If I take a baseball bat and stand outside a voting booth telling all black people they better vote for the old white guy
You will be breaking the law, and I don't know why you would want the freedom to do such an ostensibly violent thing, nor do I get what point you're trying to make. It also seems totally divorced from anything else being discussed in this thread.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You will be breaking the law, and I don't know why you would want the freedom to do such an ostensibly violent thing, nor do I get what point you're trying to make. It also seems totally divorced from anything else being discussed in this thread.
I got the reference, that's all that matters to me
Link to post
Share on other sites
The bible days you will be put to death if you say it's wrong. That's pretty clear cut coercion.
1) It's not a good idea to use a Catholic website for doctrinal issues. Seriously.2) There is nothing in Christianity that says to put anyone to death.
The modern Bible was shaped by mistakes and intentional alterations that were made by early scribes who copied the texts. Words have meanings and those meanings and intents have changed often throughout the ages.
Oh my hell. Your brainwashing by freethoughtforums.com is complete.
Link to post
Share on other sites
2) There is nothing in Christianity that says to put anyone to death.
only the new testament counts argument?
Your brainwashing by freethoughtforums.com is complete.
come on man. brainwashing? you gonna throw that at someone else?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...