coug2828 8 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I also think this draft is going to be pretty crazy with trades all over the place. should be fun Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think OT at 6 for sure, then trade down from 14 but I think they're gonna go after Claussen. Peter King said he "knows for a fact that Seattle covets Claussen". I'll be pretty bummed out if they take ClaussenIf thats the case the Whitehurst trade is even more of a headscratcher. Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If thats the case the Whitehurst trade is even more of a headscratcher.agreed. Whitehurst is kind of a headscratcher regardless. pretty sure Hass is gone after this year either way. I can't imagine what would make us "covet" Claussen anyway. not a fan Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 The players on their phones kinda takes the drama away from the draft. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Like the 2 picks. Nothing flashy just 2 guys rated 1 or 2 at their position in the draft at positions of great need. Pierre-Paul would have been a sexy pick but at Seattles stage of rebuilding a gamble probally wasnt optimal strategy. Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 yeah Philly passing on Thomas was a blessing. good job so far Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Clausen might be available at 60. Not really but qb's sure can slide if there not cant miss. Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Clausen might be available at 60. Not really but qb's sure can slide if there not cant miss.what about that LeFeouvre(spelling nowhere near correct) from western michigan or wherever? get him in the 4th?lol at denver Link to post Share on other sites
TRB05 1 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 I think Lefevour can be had later than the 4th. Hell Clausen could be there in the 2nd for the Hawks. (not sure if they still have their 2nd)edit - I see they only have pick 60 in the 2nd, don't think Clausen will be there, but who knows. What about Colt McCoy at 60, that's possible? Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 I think Lefevour can be had later than the 4th. Hell Clausen could be there in the 2nd for the Hawks. (not sure if they still have their 2nd)yeah i was just looking at the best available qb's, he's quite a ways down the list(according to espn). our 2nd is now the 60th, we traded the 40th to SD for whitehurst and the 60thwe need a rb, project qb, and the rest spread out to OL and DL. 7 picks left. i'm pretty stoked so far Link to post Share on other sites
TRB05 1 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Thomas and Okung is pretty solid. Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 what about Claussen to minnesota? would make sense(3 minutes on the clock for them) Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 With the list of available players it sure would have been nice picking 40th instead of 60th. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 what about Claussen to minnesota? would make sense(3 minutes on the clock for them)Minnesota's 100 percent getting claussen.. that's why they traded down. They knew Indy, NO and StL didn't need a qb, so it was safe to trade.I think the hawks should get the skelton guy in the 3rd round... He's from fordham, and is going to take alot of work, but he's 6-5, 225 with a huge arm, can make all the throws... I think he's a better prospect than all these schlubs besides bradford Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 With the list of available players it sure would have been nice picking 40th instead of 60th.no doubt. especially if Mays is there at 40....could have had the 2 of the top 3 safety's in the draft and not have to worry about that position for a few years. woulda been incredibleHawks had a pretty sweet first round though, all the talking heads on espn are giving them A's. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 no doubt. especially if Mays is there at 40....could have had the 2 of the top 3 safety's in the draft and not have to worry about that position for a few years. woulda been incredibleHawks had a pretty sweet first round though, all the talking heads on espn are giving them A's.heh this is the guy I actually had in mind. A fantastic cover safety in the first and a big athletic SS in the second. Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 heh this is the guy I actually had in mind. A fantastic cover safety in the first and a big athletic SS in the second.hell, he might be there at 60. Claussen might be there too. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Minnesota's 100 percent getting claussen.. that's why they traded down. They knew Indy, NO and StL didn't need a qb, so it was safe to trade.hmmmMaybe 100 percent was too strong. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Damn I was hoping Gerhart might slip to 60. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Pass rush is such a screaming need they probally go in that direction. Everson Griffen? Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Pass rush is such a screaming need they probally go in that direction. Everson Griffen?was just about to say that. if he's there definitely. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 meh another small receiver. Hopefully this is the one the breaks through and becomes a top 2 guy. Branch is probally gone now. Link to post Share on other sites
coug2828 8 Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 it was either best de, wr or rb available i think and Tate graded out best probably. he's solid, i'm stoked with our draft so far Link to post Share on other sites
TRB05 1 Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 no doubt. especially if Mays is there at 40....could have had the 2 of the top 3 safety's in the draft and not have to worry about that position for a few years. woulda been incredibleHawks had a pretty sweet first round though, all the talking heads on espn are giving them A's. Not that I disagree in this particular case, but they almost always give top grades to teams with multiple first round picks. Except the Broncos Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 Good trade. Excelent value for moving down 7 spots in the 4th and 9 spots in the 6th. Good change of pace from Forsett. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now