Stars Or Ft, Rakeback?

[OliverBanks 0]

What's better for rakeback for a player starting out with a small BR of about $100 and working your way upwards playing .02/.05c games, multitabling 12 tables for say 5 hours a day?Not sure if I'm right but, seems to me that if I signed up to a rakeback affiliate and played on FT instead I would make more money than I would accumalating FPPs/VPPs on Stars as I'll be getting RB in solid $ if i was on FullTilt and you don't get many FPPs at the lower stakes on Stars, is this correct?Thanks

[rbakken2504 0]

id go with the 27% on ftp...i know stars gives really good value for their points, but i believe, like you said it would take quite sometime to get enough points to equal the rakeback you'd get at FTP

[ff7bigfan 0]

I'd have to go with full tilt, because as you mentioned, you will get it as you go. Plus I find full tilt to be a softer site to play on for cash than stars.I would make sure you pick a good rakeback site for it, although every site offers the same 27 %, there are other things that are offered by sites that will differ. If you need a rakeback site, I recommend raketherake (link to the site in my sig). They have always been good when I've used them, pay once a week for full tilt (I prefer this over anytime you choose because it means you can't just blow your roll, get the money while you are on tilt, and lose that), plus they offer a $30,000 monthly freeroll for players that rake x amount. I have final tabled this once, and it was nice to get $3k or so bonus for a freeroll. If you had any questions about it, feel free to ask or pm.