Syntonic 0 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 http://www.benjoffe.com/holdemNot terribly useful because of the hands, but it's still pretty cool. Link to post Share on other sites
TwstdWrstr 10 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Syntonic eat my butt Link to post Share on other sites
BeaverStyle 1 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Cheating forum is down the street non-existent.... GTFO. Link to post Share on other sites
stevielarson 0 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 sad part is that this prob isnt even the dumbest thread created in the last 24 hours Link to post Share on other sites
Syntonic 0 Posted October 6, 2009 Author Share Posted October 6, 2009 Seriously? You guys just think it's I'm dumb for posting this?The point is that it's interesting. It has nothing to do with cheating, or advocating cheating. Anyone who fails to realize that deserves to be deleted. Link to post Share on other sites
XXEddie 0 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Im kinda with the OP, it's a fairly interesting read. This isn't a 'how to' article on cheating. Link to post Share on other sites
CoolHandKai 0 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Im kinda with the OP, it's a fairly interesting read. This isn't a 'how to' article on cheating.Ah, but in order to find that out, you'd have to actually click on the link. I think these days people only have time to read the thread title and fire off a quick post. I thought it was a neat observation - it didn't even occur to me that there are constellations where any cut leads to the same outcome of who is winning the hand. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Dissenters, eat my buttFYP Link to post Share on other sites
slink 1 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 I don't understand how it is possible to stack the deck so that even if it's cut you are guaranteed the winning hand. Surely it could be cut to give your opponent the cards you would have received, had it not been cut. Link to post Share on other sites
XXEddie 0 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 I don't understand how it is possible to stack the deck so that even if it's cut you are guaranteed the winning hand. Surely it could be cut to give your opponent the cards you would have received, had it not been cut.Yes. But then you would receive a different hand, and the board would be different. Link to post Share on other sites
slink 1 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Yes. But then you would receive a different hand, and the board would be different.Ok, I guess I'm just gonna have to try it. Link to post Share on other sites
HighwayStar 8 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 I found this fairl;y interesting. Link to post Share on other sites
Canary3 1 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 lol at everyone flaming the OP for no reason. Interesting read Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisRichey 1 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I knew live poker was rigged. Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 lol at everyone flaming the OP for no reason. Interesting readWow, bassically describes every single post ever posted here.... everyone hates on the OP, even when it is relative, interesting, fun... Link to post Share on other sites
lurbz 2 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Wow, bassically describes every single post ever posted here.... everyone hates on the OP, even when it is relative, interesting, fun...Nah I flame YOU instead because your IQ is equal to Ivey's bracelet count.And I may be being generous. Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Nah I flame YOU instead because your IQ is equal to Ivey's bracelet count.And I may be being generous.You flame me because you are desperate for attention by others. Link to post Share on other sites
lurbz 2 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I flame you because I am desperate for attention by others.FYP, cause I've told you that I flame you because you're retarded, but apparently you're not literate enough to read it. Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 FYP, cause I've told you that I flame you because you're retarded, but apparently you're not literate enough to read it.How is that a good reason to flame someone? You have shown your ignorance on this forum MANY times, and everyone has (for the most part) refrained from flaming..... You are obviously just a little boy, trying to bully someone on the cyberwebs... Link to post Share on other sites
lurbz 2 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 How is that a good reason to flame someone? You have shown your ignorance on this forum MANY times, and everyone has (for the most part) refrained from flaming..... You are obviously just a little boy, trying to bully someone on the cyberwebs...Pretty sure I've been called out on here 2nd/3rd most on the forum. I've been flamed PLENTY.Thing is, the only reason you flame me is because I pointed out your idiocy, others agreed that you were retarded, and you blamed me to try to look less idiotic.Whereas I flame you for said idiocy, including but not limited to the posts which I have mentioned, as well as your immortal "why won't Pokerstars let me cash out my sports betting money, it's not like they are a poker site or something" thread. Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Pretty sure I've been called out on here 2nd/3rd most on the forum. I've been flamed PLENTY.Thing is, the only reason you flame me is because I pointed out your idiocy, others agreed that you were retarded, and you blamed me to try to look less idiotic.Whereas I flame you for said idiocy, including but not limited to the posts which I have mentioned, as well as your immortal "why won't Pokerstars let me cash out my sports betting money, it's not like they are a poker site or something" thread.do you not notice that you are the only one that continues to flame, you are the only one that takes it out of the original post.and if you had 2 cents of a mind you would have read that entire page about the cash out request..... I DID NOT PLAY ON STARS, anyone that was betting with me knew that... Some could only transfer on stars, even though i didnt play there I still took the cash there, so go **** yourself.... Link to post Share on other sites
lurbz 2 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 do you not notice that you are the only one that continues to flame, you are the only one that takes it out of the original post.and if you had 2 cents of a mind you would have read that entire page about the cash out request..... I DID NOT PLAY ON STARS, anyone that was betting with me knew that... Some could only transfer on stars, even though i didnt play there I still took the cash there, so go **** yourself....I'd go through and quote all your posts from all threads but I'm sick as balls right now.Also, dunno where the saying "2 cents of a mind" came from, but if you had it, you would have read that entire page on Stars cashout request policy... Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I'd go through and quote all your posts from all threads but I'm sick as balls right now.Also, dunno where the saying "2 cents of a mind" came from, but if you had it, you would have read that entire page on Stars cashout request policy...Just leave me alone man.... thats it... please. Link to post Share on other sites
fireball 0 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Pretty interesting if you ask me. I'll have to try it out to see how it works. It would be a cool card trick to show off a bit. Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I found it interesting. But only see 48 cards per deck. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now