Jump to content

An Artilce Linked Just For Henry(hblask)


Recommended Posts

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/opinion/...edman.html?_r=1Something for you Henry to get the adrenaline pumping through your system to start the day. Here is my favorite quote. One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I think this is way more likely to anger henry.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRJ1oyhTZAQfun game we're playing here.
LOL, your right, that one wins. That guy is the poster boy for MSM of today. Only one view allowed no mater how ridiculous.Peter is the only guy I have ever heard try to explain why prices are so high. You won't hear any republicans making this point they simply want regulation that favors their interest groups instead of the democrats. This guy actually tries to say something different and the interviewer absolutely won't allow it, it would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL, your right, that one wins. That guy is the poster boy for MSM of today. Only one view allowed no mater how ridiculous.Peter is the only guy I have ever heard try to explain why prices are so high. You won't hear any republicans making this point they simply want regulation that favors their interest groups instead of the democrats. This guy actually tries to say something different and the interviewer absolutely won't allow it, it would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
my favorite part was when schiff tried to discuss college tuition and mr. guy starts talking about rates at private high schools.facepalm. we've found the o'reilly of the left.
Link to post
Share on other sites
my favorite part was when schiff tried to discuss college tuition and mr. guy starts talking about rates at private high schools.facepalm. we've found the o'reilly of the left.
He interrupts like O'Reilly... but O'Reilly is 10x smarter.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Almost done. My ears are starting to bleed.Why don't I get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to have a show? I'd be so much better than this guy. All you have to do is get interesting people and listen to them. It's not too hard.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Almost done. My ears are starting to bleed.Why don't I get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to have a show? I'd be so much better than this guy. All you have to do is get interesting people and listen to them. It's not too hard.
Almost done. My ears are starting to bleed.Why don't I get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to have a show? I'd be so much better than this guy. All you have to do is get interesting people and listen to them. It's not too hard.
People make fun of Larry King, but at least he lets people talk. His shows only suck when he has too many guests. He may be a leftie, but he will let those that disagree with him make a point. I dissed the MSM in my earlier post but the truth is I don't watch Hannity, or Oreilly because they rarely let their guests finish a point, even the guests they agree with have to fight like mad to finish a sentence.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Almost done. My ears are starting to bleed.Why don't I get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to have a show? I'd be so much better than this guy. All you have to do is get interesting people and talk over them. It's not too hard.
true
Link to post
Share on other sites
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/...for-obama-plan/BIG JUMP IN THE POSITIVE NUMBERS ON HEALTH CARE AFTER SPEECH!*-CNN*"The sample of speech-watchers in this poll was 45 percent Democratic and 18 percent Republican."
37% independent? interesting. I think this speech was as much about placating the left as it was trying to cross the bridge with the right. Bipartisanship is a dream anyway....the two parties are too far apart to truly come together (for now).
Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/opinion/...edman.html?_r=1Something for you Henry to get the adrenaline pumping through your system to start the day. Here is my favorite quote. One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century.
The "as in China today" part is pretty hilarious, but I can't say I strongly disagree with his notion that a benevolent dictator is better than an unlimited democracy. His example, China, is of course far from a benevolent dictator, but if they made someone smart, good-looking, kind, and wise, such as me, dictator of the US, we'd be better off than with the current joker.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The "as in China today" part is pretty hilarious, but I can't say I strongly disagree with his notion that a benevolent dictator is better than an unlimited democracy. His example, China, is of course far from a benevolent dictator, but if they made someone smart, good-looking, kind, and wise, such as me, dictator of the US, we'd be better off than with the current joker.
Isn't that the whole point though. That's how dictators take the reins in the first place. Because if selfishness and greed were not factors, then a totalitarianism would obviously be the correct government to have... the problem is, of course, that there will ALWAYS be selfishness and greed... which is why they never work. But OBAMA can do it!
Link to post
Share on other sites
The "as in China today" part is pretty hilarious, but I can't say I strongly disagree with his notion that a benevolent dictator is better than an unlimited democracy. His example, China, is of course far from a benevolent dictator, but if they made someone smart, good-looking, kind, and wise, such as me, dictator of the US, we'd be better off than with the current joker.
I could support this. Canebrain, of course, would be imprisoned under your regime, correct?
Link to post
Share on other sites
if we're gonna do this, I'm gonna need to know who's gonna make prostitution and automatic weapons legal.
I wouldn't make prostitution legal, I'd make it mandatory. Every are over 46 million people who go without prostitutes every single year.
Link to post
Share on other sites
if we're gonna do this, I'm gonna need to know who's gonna make prostitution and automatic weapons legal.
prostitution legal, pot legal, handguns legal, assault weapons illegal.also, no casino would be permitted to offer 6:5 odds on blackjack. **** that.I actually think Henry and me see eye to eye on a lot of issues...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...