ABigMotivation 0 Posted August 4, 2009 Share Posted August 4, 2009 Assume no reads. Comments on all streets appreciated.http://www.flopturnriver.com/Poker-Hand-Qd...-MP2-805972.php Link to post Share on other sites
rrumsey 0 Posted August 4, 2009 Share Posted August 4, 2009 flop call of a value sized bet is marginal but i ista fold, as played we were hoping to see a free river Link to post Share on other sites
KingJames 11 Posted August 4, 2009 Share Posted August 4, 2009 As played I think it's a snap fold on the river, a very high % of his range has hit... Link to post Share on other sites
tskillz187 0 Posted August 4, 2009 Share Posted August 4, 2009 I don't think there's much to discuss. Seems standard and standard river fold. Link to post Share on other sites
Temporary Nuts 1 Posted August 4, 2009 Share Posted August 4, 2009 I don't think there's much to discuss. Seems standard and standard river fold.Not at all. 4bet/fold preflop. Postflop is fine as long as u folded. Link to post Share on other sites
Crazy Cypriot 0 Posted August 4, 2009 Share Posted August 4, 2009 I like the way you played it. as played it must be fold on the river, unless villain bluffs often enough to make a bluff catch profitable Link to post Share on other sites
rrumsey 0 Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 I like the way you played it. as played it must be fold on the river, unless villain bluffs often enough to make a bluff catch profitableEven an overplay bluff is killing us we don't have much of a bluff catcher at all we can only beat stone cold bluffs so i don't see that being profitable at all unless we are up against a unbelievable maniac Link to post Share on other sites
NoBBiR 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 I like it a lot as played honestly. Link to post Share on other sites
Temporary Nuts 1 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 Can someone explain to me why we are not four betting through a min-3-bet with the 3rd nuts?I think "trapping" when you are readless on players is extra spewy Link to post Share on other sites
JSpencer 0 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 Can someone explain to me why we are not four betting through a min-3-bet with the 3rd nuts?I think "trapping" when you are readless on players is extra spewySilly to 4 bet this preflop, in a tournament maybe, but not in a cash game.He played it fine, fold on the river and call it a day. Link to post Share on other sites
Temporary Nuts 1 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 Silly to 4 bet this preflop, in a tournament maybe, but not in a cash game.He played it fine, fold on the river and call it a day.I thought I was a nit and I don't even keep my 4 bet range at AA/KK/AKSorry to really go off like this... but people you can't let these minraises life own you!!! They should be treated as a call with the benefit side effect of being able to get more value out of your hand... so freaking do it. High pocket pairs retain their value on one street, preflop, since they often do not improve. Also, when they do improve, it's often top set which is a difficult hand to get value out of since you crush the board. So, preflop, that's exactly where we should be getting our value given *any* opportunity to do so. Link to post Share on other sites
Fluffdog87 2 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 I like it a lot as played honestly. Link to post Share on other sites
NoBBiR 0 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 TN, I 4bet this a lot, but it isn't the end of the world not doing so. I prefer to 4bet this with reads than without them, A LOT. Link to post Share on other sites
JSpencer 0 Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 I thought I was a nit and I don't even keep my 4 bet range at AA/KK/AKI only 4bet with AA and KK in cash games, and possibly other hands depending on the information we have on our opponent. We are assuming no reads here. Why are we going to 4 bet for value pre-flop, we have almost no information on the villain, the way he plays, or his range.I'd rather keep the pot relatively smaller, see a safe flop, and lead out rather than build up a big pot, see a board like that, and be left with a difficult decision.Personally I think it was played perfectly. Snapfold on the river, we obviously are behind here. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now