Jump to content

Wsop Event 28, 1,500nl


  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. What's the right play in this spot?

    • Rico should have bet out on the flop. Screw slowplaying.
      8
    • Rico's check was the right play.
      18


Recommended Posts

Hey all, my buddy Rico Ramirez placed third last night in event #28 after holding 65% of the chips in play late at the final table.Here's the hand that cost him his tournament life.

Rico Ramirez Eliminated in 3rd Place ($261,963)Mike Eise raised to 300,000 from the button and Rico Ramirez made the call from the big blind.The flop fell down K :jh J :5c J :D and both players checked the see the 9 :club: fall on the turn. Ramirez lead out for 725,000 only to have Eise move all in. Ramirez called and the cards were tabled.Ramirez: J :ts 4 :4h Eise: 9 :3h 9 :D With Ramirez needing to improve to a full house to stay alive, the 10 :qh on the river would be not what he was looking for, and consequently headed to the rail in 3rd place for a $261,963 payday.
Some of our friends are saying he should have bet out on that flop, while others are saying he was right to check to get as much value out of the hand as possible.Here's the link to the live updates at the final table.Thoughts on the hand?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey all, my buddy Rico Ramirez placed third last night in event #28 after holding 65% of the chips in play late at the final table.Here's the hand that cost him his tournament life.Some of our friends are saying he should have bet out on that flop, while others are saying he was right to check to get as much value out of the hand as possible.Here's the link to the live updates at the final table.Thoughts on the hand?
imo betting that flop draws a raise anyway. sick cooler but no real way to avoid it :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont mind taking off a flop by calling preflop and I dont mind checking the flop. Just a tough turn card. You have to take a chance once in a while at a final table.If your buddy had 65% of the chips at one point and went out in 3rd then there was probably a hand before this one that was much more crucial/damaging.3rd place is still pretty awesome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damned if you do damned if you dont, but I wouldnt give a free card here. Too many danger cards out there. Bet the flop big. What better flop are you looking for when you call with J 4?But congrats to Rico!

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHA?!?!I don't see how anyone saying that he "should" bet the flop isn't being totally results oriented.I think it's fine 3 handed to see a flop, and i think it's clearly fine to check ahead here. Three handed play ranges are way wide. Sure the 9 on the turn isn't a great card to see, but it's not THAT bad (in my world of ranges including all the way down to various numerical suited connectors, etc.), and just sucks that villian had 99.In the end I'm betting that 99 at least calls whatever bet your boy puts down on the flop anyways, so the real question is do you think your boy doesn't end up getting it all in the turn with his hand with even more chips in the pot now?The only way your buddy stays alive here (after calling pre) is if he pushes on the flop.....but I don't know if that's a profitable play....because so many hands are typically willing to fold here (although does entice someone to call light). I agree with noted above, I typically check fully expecting a C-Bet from the in position pre flop raiser. In reality my breakdown (on flop) here would probably be something like 60% check/ 35% bet 1/2-2/3rds pot/ 5% push.Tough break for him and GG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Starting stacks and how the table are playing are very important here.But I fold pre unless I have history and this guy has been raising everything pre flop 3 handedI lead trips on the flop because it looks like a steal. I think long term you get more value betting here.Nothing you can do once that turn comes, just ul. GG, WP, ETC...

Link to post
Share on other sites
WHA?!?!I don't see how anyone saying that he "should" bet the flop isn't being totally results oriented.I think it's fine 3 handed to see a flop, and i think it's clearly fine to check ahead here. Three handed play ranges are way wide. Sure the 9 on the turn isn't a great card to see, but it's not THAT bad (in my world of ranges including all the way down to various numerical suited connectors, etc.), and just sucks that villian had 99.
I think this is results oriented.As I said, a bet on that turn gets called by a huge range and in the long term I think you get more value. I could be wrong.But I need to know more, seeing a flop with suited J4 is looking for the perfect flop unless this guy is really weak post flop. And you got that perfect flop. I bet. He will call light because he won't believe you have the J - could even induce a raise. The 9 doesn't scare me and the chips are going in anyway at that point - just ul.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I think this is results oriented.As I said, a bet on that turn gets called by a huge range and in the long term I think you get more value. I could be wrong.But I need to know more, seeing a flop with suited J4 is looking for the perfect flop unless this guy is really weak post flop. And you got that perfect flop. I bet. He will call light because he won't believe you have the J - could even induce a raise. The 9 doesn't scare me and the chips are going in anyway at that point - just ul.
I was just coming on to edit my breakdown to more of a 50/50 between betting 2/3rds pot and checking. There is a huge range that at least calls the flop, I agree. I still say that OP's boy shouldn't hang head in shame though, because this is a situation where checking is absolutely fine too. Though I agree without knowing the Villian's table image, it's tough to say because that's the A-1 indicator of whether to check or bet this flop.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey all, my buddy Rico Ramirez placed third last night in event #28 after holding 65% of the chips in play late at the final table.Here's the hand that cost him his tournament life.Some of our friends are saying he should have bet out on that flop, while others are saying he was right to check to get as much value out of the hand as possible.Here's the link to the live updates at the final table.Thoughts on the hand?
What are the stack sizes and blind levels?
Link to post
Share on other sites
What are the stack sizes and blind levels?
Pretty sure it was round 29, blinds 50k/100k. Rico had a huge stack, shortly before this hand he held over 7 million of 11.8 million in play.It might have been a round later, but the stack sizes were about the same.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You should know that it is impossible to raise when nobody bets.
He could be one of those people who call it a "raise" when someone opens the betting after the flop...I really dislike those people.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Pretty sure it was round 29, blinds 50k/100k. Rico had a huge stack, shortly before this hand he held over 7 million of 11.8 million in play.It might have been a round later, but the stack sizes were about the same.
He can't have 7 of 12 million of chips in play if this is his bust hand....unless I'm missing something.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I said "bet out" because you really have no clue what your opponent has. If you make a bet and get called, then you need to be wary and I really think you can get away from a hand like this if someone shoves over the top.A guy who pairs the K will stick around, but a bet will chase out most underpairs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
He can't have 7 of 12 million of chips in play if this is his bust hand....unless I'm missing something.
He had that many chips in the level prior to his bustout. If you look at the live updates, he lost a large pot just before this. Rico called an all in with A8, villain had A9.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Pretty sure it was round 29, blinds 50k/100k. Rico had a huge stack, shortly before this hand he held over 7 million of 11.8 million in play.It might have been a round later, but the stack sizes were about the same.
2.9mil? If so, it's def a fold PF, I would think.
Link to post
Share on other sites
2.9mil? If so, it's def a fold PF, I would think.
That's debatable but you have to bet that flop! No way I am giving a free card on that board, that's a good way to end up where the OP's friend did.
Link to post
Share on other sites
That's debatable but you have to bet that flop! No way I am giving a free card on that board, that's a good way to end up where the OP's friend did.
lol, results oriented much?
Link to post
Share on other sites
I said "bet out" because you really have no clue what your opponent has. If you make a bet and get called, then you need to be wary and I really think you can get away from a hand like this if someone shoves over the top.A guy who pairs the K will stick around, but a bet will chase out most underpairs.
Betting to "find out where you are at" is the worst reasoning of all time. Bets are designed to extract value or to be bluffs.Checking is perfectly fine on this board, if we're chasing out underpairs and only getting kings and hands that beat us to stick around by leading it's prob not great. 3 handed ranges are A LOT wider than any of you are giving credit for.Villain in this hand should be c-betting basically most of his range if checked to. He really shouldn't be checking too often so it's not like you're giving a "free card", and besides, like I said before, ranges are wayyyy wider 3 handed. I'd def check and let him barrel, and prob check most turns and reevaluate.Lots of results oriented thinking ITT.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...