Jump to content

Clonie Gowen Lawsuit Against Full Tilt Dismissed


Recommended Posts

http://www.pokernews.com/news/2009/05/gowe...missed-6521.htm
Gowen Lawsuit Against Full Tilt DismissedMay 04, 2009, Haley Hintze A United States District Court judge has dismissed an action brought by Cycalona “Clonie” Gowen against a large group of international corporations and famous professional players affiliated with Full Tilt Poker. The action, brought by Gowen in November, 2008, initially listed 13 different members of Team Full Tilt among the defendants. All but one of those players was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Gowen cannot file a new claim against them over the matter.Gowen sought the equivalent of a 1% share in Full Tilt’s net worth in her initial action, plus damages, which she and her attorneys valued at $40 million when filing the case. Gowen alleged breach of an oral contract, unjust enrichment and fraud among other claims, all of which were dismissed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston last week. Johnston also dismissed a pending April 30th hearing in the matter, leaving Gowen only the option to appeal his findings. Only three of the initial defendants in the action were omitted from the “with prejudice” class, leaving only Tiltware LLC, Tiltware owner Ray Bitar, and famed Full Tilt pro Howard Lederer to face followup actions from Gowen, whose attorneys immediately filed a motion attempting to extend the case over secondary claims not specifically mentioned in the dismissal order. The twelve Full Tilt pros removed from the action in their entirety were Andy Bloch, Phil Ivey, Chris Ferguson, John Juanda, Phil Gordon, Erick Lindgren, Erik Seidel, Jennifer Harman-Traniello, Mike Matusow, Allen Cunningham, Gus Hansen and Patrik Antonius.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how she thought she could sue the pros that represent FT.That would be like taking nike to court and adding Tiger and other top sports stars they have under contract to the lawsuit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a very bad article. It does not explain why is really suing the big guns. Did they say something bad? Did she get a boo boo from their words? 40 million for that, come on. It should be dropped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she should not waste her time. her lawyers probably cost a fortune.clearly, though, she is dumb so expect several appeals. She'll never see a dime.

Link to post
Share on other sites
she should not waste her time. her lawyers probably cost a fortune.
This is probably true but perhaps her lawyers might have taken on her case on a contingency basis (for about 33~40% of any recovery). If that were the case, I think her lawyers would be the ones ultimately determining whether to pursue any further.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...