Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Imaginary hug. Hoooray we're all friends again!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Good call Copernicus..Good lord, you are immature.You've done this a dozen times now, and it's still a surprise. You expect this in kindergarten, but from a grown man, it's just pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 24, 2009 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Imaginary hug. Hoooray we're all friends again!!!we are always friends...biatch is awesome..Lets do a parlay Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Only one NHL game tmw, and so I don't know about parlay, lol. Unless you want NBA games, lol. None look too yummy yet based no the lines I see though. Same with the NHL. Over under tmw is 5.0, which confuzzles me, and not enough bets placed yet to make a judgement call on it. Based on the early line though, I think I like NYR win +175, but not 100% sure yet, will have to clarify in the morning before I leave to work Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 24, 2009 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Only one NHL game tmw, and so I don't know about parlay, lol. Unless you want NBA games, lol. None look too yummy yet based no the lines I see though. Same with the NHL. Over under tmw is 5.0, which confuzzles me, and not enough bets placed yet to make a judgement call on it. Based on the early line though, I think I like NYR win +175, but not 100% sure yet, will have to clarify in the morning before I leave to workill be listening Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 I realize you guys probably don't want to bet basketball. But to all those who have online betting accounts.I would advise 2 units on Utah to UPSET win (moneyline) over LA Lakers at 10:30pm tonight Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 24, 2009 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Good lord, you are immature.You've done this a dozen times now, and it's still a surprise. You expect this in kindergarten, but from a grown man, it's just pathetic.pfft...who said i was grown..and i guess the jokes need to stop from now on..Sorry my fuhrer. Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 pfft...who said i was grown..and i guess the jokes need to stop from now on..Sorry my fuhrer.Godwin's Law [usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful. Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Godwin's Law [usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful.Serge's Law:For every FCP Hockey Forum post that is on-topic and useful to the discussion at hand, a post will be made by Serge that has little to nothing to do with the given subject and is somewhat mean-spirited, hostile, rude, antagonisitic, trolling, or completely asinine (or any combination of the above). But it's ok, because he's only kidding and/or he can't help it. Or so he claims when called on it by other members of the FCP Hockey Forum. Haha, ha. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 24, 2009 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Serge's Law:For every FCP Hockey Forum post that is on-topic and useful to the discussion at hand, a post will be made by Serge that has little to nothing to do with the given subject and is somewhat mean-spirited, hostile, rude, antagonisitic, trolling, or completely asinine (or any combination of the above). But it's ok, because he's only kidding and/or he can't help it. Or so he claims when called on it by other members of the FCP Hockey Forum. Haha, ha.that is not true at all..Ill give you a pass ONE TIME. Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 that is not true at all..Ill give you a pass ONE TIME.I need a pass from you?I guess you're right, the ratio is more like 1/5. Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 I like the Rangers/Caps under at even money. -120 for the over seems insane to me!I still havent figured out what the "money line 3 way" is all about. Link to post Share on other sites
WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Was - Nyr under has my suppor.t Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 I like the Rangers/Caps under at even money. -120 for the over seems insane to me!I still havent figured out what the "money line 3 way" is all about.3-way means a regulation tie, home win, visitor win, are the 3 options.=================Are the Rags really +175?That has to be +EV? Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 3-way means a regulation tie, home win, visitor win, are the 3 options.=================Are the Rags really +175?That has to be +EV?give me an example of the 3 way....i dont get it still. Rangers +280, Caps -130, Tie +320 +180 now. Its one of those lines that is so bizarre it scares me. Id buy Caps +180 lol. Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 just got back from Rama Coper the 3 way betting means you have to win in regulation if you take Wash and they win in OT you lose your bet. Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 As for the RTE discussion and its future we can decide at the end of the playoffs those that want their share back can take it those that want to hang on for next year can also do that.Iam all for doing this again next year with remaining funds I think we have found some flaws and can get better. $900 is still alot and I think we will still can make money. Those that want out have the right to leave so we can deal with this at the end of the playoffs.almost 3 in the morning and Iam wide awake this is not good, I have a 14 hour shift tommorrow.One rule moving forward no more I told you so's or ragging on a guy who gives their opinion. We want everyone to be vocal and not scared to give their 2 cents. I always like to bounce back after a bad play, hoping others do as well. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 give me an example of the 3 way....i dont get it still. Rangers +280, Caps -130, Tie +320 +180 now. Its one of those lines that is so bizarre it scares me. Id buy Caps +180 lol.Yeah, sorry, I explained it wrong. It's all in regulation. Tie, Rangers, or Caps, whatever it is at the end of regulation. You lose if it goes to OT, unless you picked tie. Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 I realize you guys probably don't want to bet basketball. But to all those who have online betting accounts.I would advise 2 units on Utah to UPSET win (moneyline) over LA Lakers at 10:30pm tonightUtah squeaked out the win, amazing game. As for the NHL game tonight, I'm not really too huge on picking a winner based on the line, and I am very confused with the line on the over under. I would advise to stay away from it. Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Hmmmm, I'm still not too strong on it, but if I had to make a bet tonight, I would agree with the above guys that I like the UNDER in the Washington/New York Game. I have a feeling Washington wins like 2-0 or 2-1 Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 One rule moving forward no more I told you so's or ragging on a guy who gives their opinion. We want everyone to be vocal and not scared to give their 2 cents. I always like to bounce back after a bad play, hoping others do as well.This I really agree with. I think this is why some guys wont bother putting in their 2 cents, for fear of being wrong. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 +180 now. Its one of those lines that is so bizarre it scares me. Id buy Caps +180 lol.yeah, I don't really get it either. (+175 now)If I made tonights line, it would be a lot closer to pick 'em. Scares me too, what arent we seeing?Im good with the under.Im very undecided on the NYR bet, only cause I dont get the line. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Utah squeaked out the win, amazing game.Thanks Dan. I listened to you, put a small wager on it, and rooted Utah to victory. Good game to watch.Nice call. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 24, 2009 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Thanks Dan. I listened to you, put a small wager on it, and rooted Utah to victory. Good game to watch.Nice call.While I havent met Dan "the Biatch", I feel like we would have so much fun together....He is smart, funny and most of all a goofball like me. He is one of the select few on here that gets me and isnt a condescending douche.Awesome guy. Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Yeah, sorry, I explained it wrong. It's all in regulation. Tie, Rangers, or Caps, whatever it is at the end of regulation. You lose if it goes to OT, unless you picked tie.Ahhhh...so its really a "one way bet" with three choices.You can increase your money line but restricting it to regulation? It seems like if you like the favorite in you can cover yourself vs an OT loss pretty cheap. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now