Magnum666 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 I recenty got poker tracker and after about 2900 hands of $25 NL I'm showing a profit of 25.23 BB/100...this seems inordinately high compared to what I've heard, but perhaps with small stake NL this is sustainable. I know 2,900 hands isn't enough but does anyone have an opinion on what the highest sustainable bb/100 is? Link to post Share on other sites
allinbluff35 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 come back when you've got at least 10k hands Link to post Share on other sites
Vade 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 come back when you've got at least 10k handsAgree with that, but in NL I'd imagine it's possible at low limits. 25 BB/100 is only 6 bucks...possible, sure, likely, no Link to post Share on other sites
Magnum666 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Author Share Posted May 17, 2005 actually it's $12.50, poker tracker tracks no limit bb as twice the big blind, but thanks for the info Link to post Share on other sites
pokerplayer24 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 Its definitely possible. people at 25 nl blow. Link to post Share on other sites
Vade 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 Its definitely possible. people at 25 nl blow.I resemble that remark Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute 0 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 25BB/100 is not sustainable at any medium of poker.some of you are really stupid. Link to post Share on other sites
BigLebowski 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 Yeah, sustaining $12.50 in 100 hands of NL25 is impossible..don't even try it. Link to post Share on other sites
Magnum666 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 well i'm glad this was cleared up Link to post Share on other sites
MarkZ 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 I've logged 60+ hours so far at the $25 NL tables on Party, and so far I have a rate of about $6.80/hr. If you estimate maybe 70 hands/hr, this is a little more than 4000 hands. I also started off really hot at these tables but a rate of $10+/hr is probably unsustainable. If you want, I can post my status after 10,000 hands. Link to post Share on other sites
Magnum666 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 I've logged 60+ hours so far at the $25 NL tables on Party, and so far I have a rate of about $6.80/hr. If you estimate maybe 70 hands/hr, this is a little more than 4000 hands. I also started off really hot at these tables but a rate of $10+/hr is probably unsustainable. If you want, I can post my status after 10,000 hands.Yeah that would be helpful...thanks. I'm currently up $360 after 2,877 hands....figure this can't last but I'll post again when I reach 5-10,000 hands to see if it's fallen off. Link to post Share on other sites
MDXS 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 25BB/100 is not sustainable at any medium of poker.some of you are really stupid.You shouldn't speak in absolutes. A monkey could have that win rate at .01/.02 O8 at Stars. Link to post Share on other sites
RonBurgundy 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 should be much higher imo Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 25BB/100 is not sustainable at any medium of poker.some of you are really stupid.You shouldn't speak in absolutes. A monkey could have that win rate at .01/.02 O8 at Stars.everyone knows thats not really poker! Link to post Share on other sites
BigLebowski 0 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 hate to bump this thread, but i just finished a weekend binge of NL25 6max on the party skins. My PT says 29.4BB/100 for the roughly 7500 hands i played. Maybe I hit the right tables..maybe not, but you might be mistaken Absolute. My sarcastic comment was based on the 3K hands I already had in PT and the ~22BB/100 it showed for that. Sustaining 25BB/100 may not be possible over the LONG run, but I do believe sustaining 15+ is very achievable. I typically play 5/10 full and 6max, but I have really enjoyed playing the low stakes NL games. Maybe my BB/100 is high because I have no problem putting someone all in for $25 if I think I have a slight edge and will get a call. Don't know that I would take that philosophy to the higher NL tables, but knowing my max hit on a hand is $25 makes it a no brainer for me. Link to post Share on other sites
elkang 0 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I'm of the opinion that 10 BB/100 in NL is a good sustainable rate.The table selection matters much more than the small skill differences between a great low limit NL player and a very good one. I think I am an okay-mediocre player now and my BB rate varies over 200% based on the site and tables. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Its definitely possible. people at 25 nl blow.I resemble that remark Ja? Link to post Share on other sites
rons2112 0 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I recenty got poker tracker and after about 2900 hands of $25 NL I'm showing a profit of 25.23 BB/100...this seems inordinately high compared to what I've heard, but perhaps with small stake NL this is sustainable. I know 2,900 hands isn't enough but does anyone have an opinion on what the highest sustainable bb/100 is?I am going to get flamed for this, but I am new and am going to ask anyway. What in the world does "25.23 BB/ 100" mean? In English? Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I am going to get flamed for this, but I am new and am going to ask anyway. What in the world does "25.23 BB/ 100" mean? In English?It means a winrate of 25.23 big bets per 100 hands played. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now