Stretchy 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I've really been getting into HU cash games recently. Even though I'm seriously underrolled for even the lowest limits on stars which is .25/.50 I feel like my SnG play has really not been so good and I will still play the occasional full Ring game. So the question is what would be a good starting roll for .25/.50 NLHE HU and should I be moving over to Full Tilt for rakeback if i do decide to pursue this? Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I've really been getting into HU cash games recently. Even though I'm seriously underrolled for even the lowest limits on stars which is .25/.50 I feel like my SnG play has really not been so good and I will still play the occasional full Ring game. So the question is what would be a good starting roll for .25/.50 NLHE HU and should I be moving over to Full Tilt for rakeback if i do decide to pursue this?$2k min Link to post Share on other sites
CrookedLink 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Rake's a bitch at 50NL HU. Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Rake's a bitch at 50NL HU.true statement. be prepared to be super patient and grind Link to post Share on other sites
Vtlaxer09 4 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 coming for my bounty are you tehtoe lolhu is full of regs and practically unbeatable with the rake... i'd stick to sng's. Link to post Share on other sites
CrookedLink 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 hu is full of regs and practically unbeatable with the rake... i'd stick to sng's.LOLedit: LOL at random quote obv. Link to post Share on other sites
TeeSludge 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 hu is full of regs and practically unbeatable with the rake... i'd stick to sng's.couldn't agree more.. they'll probably get rid of the HU tables in a few months anyway Link to post Share on other sites
antistuff 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 i cant tell if you guys are being sarcastic or not. Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 $2k min Rake's a bitch at 50NL HU. true statement. be prepared to be super patient and grindNo sarcasmhu is full of regs and practically unbeatable with the rake... i'd stick to sng's. couldn't agree more.. they'll probably get rid of the HU tables in a few months anywaySarcasm Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 No sarcasmSarcasmOpposite of what he said. Link to post Share on other sites
babylondonks 5 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Opposite of what he said.QFT Link to post Share on other sites
antistuff 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 die. Link to post Share on other sites
Giggidy 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 die.Sarcasm Link to post Share on other sites
AcesOnFire 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 SarcasmSarcasm. Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 i cant tell if you guys are being sarcastic or not.They're serious. I can't get over how many people assume HU is easy and end up by getting crushed by all the regs and the killer rake. Link to post Share on other sites
Giggidy 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 They're serious. I can't get over how many people assume HU is easy and end up by getting crushed by all the regs and the killer rake.I read on 2p2 that the rake @ 50nl makes it impossible to beat ppl that buy in for min. Seeing how quick the money dissapears, I believe it and dont play them Link to post Share on other sites
Vtlaxer09 4 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I read on 2p2 that the rake @ 50nl makes it impossible to beat ppl that buy in for min. Seeing how quick the money dissapears, I believe it and dont play themsame is true all the way up to 5/10. Even full stackers.. if you dont beat them in like 50 hands... it just isnt worth your while. Stick to sng's and full ring cash. Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 same is true all the way up to 5/10. Even full stackers.. if you dont beat them in like 50 hands... it just isnt worth your while. Stick to sng's and full ring cash.Personally, I quit any opponent after 20 hands if I haven't stacked them yet (no matter how well or how poor they play)......Too much money will have disappeared to rake to make it worth-while staying much longer than that anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
Giggidy 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Personally, I quit any opponent after 20 hands if I haven't stacked them yet (no matter how well or how poor they play)...20?? Wow, you are a nit. I wait til at least 30. Maybe I need to game select better Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now