phlegm 6 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Dont pretend you even exist,cause we know better. Link to post Share on other sites
loogie 115 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Dont pretend you even exist,cause we know better.The royal we?I can't believe I imagined that you made this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Had to google solipsistThanks for thuinking up google so I could look it upwhy did you misspell thinking? Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodAFD 0 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Cogito ergo sum Link to post Share on other sites
phlegm 6 Posted January 15, 2009 Author Share Posted January 15, 2009 Cogito ergo sum I thought, therefore I was? Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodAFD 0 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 I thought, therefore I was?Close.... but it's "I think, therefore I am".... from René Descartes,... Link to post Share on other sites
vbnautilus 48 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Close.... but it's "I think, therefore I am".... from René Descartes,... Descartes' Error Link to post Share on other sites
The Walrus 0 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Isn't solipsism a version of "perception is reality" , not really directly related to "i think , therefore i am" by descartes , cause descartes was a rationalist , and solipsism is everything but rational.. it's logical though and consistent but not falsifiable , which means it cannot be proven nor be denied. Let's wait till one day a brilliant psycho-analyst stands up and finds some rational proof of solipsism ( if that's even a possibility ). Crap untill proven otherwise ;)p.s. didnt think my first post would be this unrelated to poker ! Link to post Share on other sites
phlegm 6 Posted January 16, 2009 Author Share Posted January 16, 2009 Isn't solipsism a version of "perception is reality" , not really directly related to "i think , therefore i am" by descartes , cause descartes was a rationalist , and solipsism is everything but rational.. it's logical though and consistent but not falsifiable , which means it cannot be proven nor be denied. Let's wait till one day a brilliant psycho-analyst stands up and finds some rational proof of solipsism ( if that's even a possibility ). Crap untill proven otherwise ;)p.s. didnt think my first post would be this unrelated to poker ! As I understand it, a true solipsist believes their reality is in fact a singularity. The existence of others cannot be empirically proved nor disproved Which is why I cant understand why Im responding. Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodAFD 0 Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 As I understand it, a true solipsist believes their reality is in fact a singularity. The existence of others cannot be empirically proved nor disproved Which is why I cant understand why Im responding. Brilliant.... well played sir Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now