Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Never saw this thread.   Always have tested INTJ, obviously.   Of course this sort of test isn't very rigorous, but I can safely say that if you are not INTJ or INTP you are probably stupid in som

In the past I have always tested as an ENFJ, this time I am an ENFP. Your personality type is ENFP.Extraverted (E) 61% Introverted (I) 39%Intuitive (N) 73% Sensing (S) 27%Feeling (F) 75% Thinking (T) 25%Perceiving (P) 68% Judging (J) 32%Maybe the change is due to that I was a trainer which is inline with ENFJ and now I am a supervisor so the perceiving has kicked in more? :club:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your personality type is ENTJ.Extraverted (E) 64% Introverted (I) 36%Intuitive (N) 64% Sensing (S) 36%Thinking (T) 55% Feeling (F) 45%Judging (J) 55% Perceiving (P) 45%No matter how many times I take these things - I always hit the same results, weirdly.ENTJs generally have the following traits: * Driven to turn theories into plans * Highly value knowledge * Future-oriented * Natural leaders * Impatient with inefficiency and incompetence * Want things structured and orderly * Excellent verbal communication skills * Dislike routine, detail-oriented tasks * Self-confident * DecisiveENTJs are especially well-suited to be leaders and organization builders. They have the ability to clearly identify problems and innovative solutions for the short and long-term well-being of an organization. Having a strong desire to lead, they're not likely to be happy as followers. ENTJs like to be in charge, and need to be in charge to take advantage of their special capabilities.The following list of professions is built on our impressions of careers which would be especially suitable for an ENTJ. It is meant to be a starting place, rather than an exhaustive list. There are no guarantees that any or all of the careers listed here would be appropriate for you, or that your best career match is among those listed.Possible Career Paths for the ENTJ: * Corporate Executive Officer; Organization Builder * Entrepreneur * Computer Consultant * Lawyer * Judge * Business Administrators and Managers * University Professors and AdministratorsGod knows how I ended up in the military then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your personality type is ENFP.Extraverted (E) 64% Introverted (I) 36% Intuitive (N) 95% Sensing (S) 5% Feeling (F) 100% Thinking (T) 0% Perceiving (P) 82% Judging (J) 18% The E is surprising. I've always been an I in these things before, but then it's been quite a while since I took one. Extravert, iNtuitive, Feeler, Perceiver (ENFP)ENFPs represent between 6 and 8% of the U.S. populationCurious, energetic, adaptable, and creative, ENFPs like considering unconventional approaches. They enjoy batting around ideas and finding creative solutions and are energized and intrigued by new possibilities and anything out of the ordinary. ENFPs tend to be talkative, enthusiastic, playful, and generally fun-loving people. Warm and caring, ENFPs have strong personal values upon which they base most decisions. Conversations with ENFPs can be very circular as they excitedly move from one topic to the next, making connections and associations. Unconventional and occasionally irreverent, they pride themselves on their uniqueness and originality. Optimistic, and spontaneous, ENFPs have a strong sense of the possible. For them, life is an exciting drama. Because they are so interested in possibilities, ENFPs see significance in all things and prefer to keep lots of options open. ENFPs Tend To Be:• Creative, resourceful & naturally curious• Highly diplomatic consensus builders• Perceptive about people; great collaborators• Enthusiastic & inspiring communicators• Able to "think outside the box" & see possibilities• Adaptable; able to shift gears & change directions quicklyCareer SatisfiersAll people are most satisfied and successful when using their natural talents in an environment that is consistent with their personality preferences and values. Research shows that ENFPs are most satisfied by jobs that provide the following:• The opportunity to use their creativity to find solutions that help people• Opportunities to work collaboratively with other fun, creative people• Variety in the types of tasks they perform on a daily basis• Friendly, supportive, tension-free environment• Regularly expressed appreciation & recognition for their unique contributions

Link to post
Share on other sites
take it .... and then take it again with your Mom/Dad/spouse/co worker 's input.
Hmm, now that would be interesting. Of course, it'd be the last time I talk to any of them.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Your personality type is ISTJ.Introverted (I) 75% Extraverted (E) 25%Sensing (S) 50% Intuitive (N) 50%Thinking (T) 80% Feeling (F) 20%Judging (J) 73% Perceiving (P) 27%
Test ResultsYour personality type is ISTJ.Introverted (I) 86% Extraverted (E) 14%Sensing (S) 59% Intuitive (N) 41%Thinking (T) 65% Feeling (F) 35%Judging (J) 64% Perceiving (P) 36%Possible Career Paths for the ISTJ: * Business Executives, Administrators and Managers * Accountants and Financial Officers * Police and Detectives * Judges * Lawyers * Medical Doctors / Dentists * Computer Programmers, Systems Analysts, and Computer Specialists * Military Leaders spot on test?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice how women (and effeminate men) aren't "thinkers" but rather, "feelers". My girl took the test today: 85% "feeling" while I was 85% "thinking". Also, I would book unlimited action that people who are "feelers" are prone to voting a certain way, while "thinkers" are prone to voting another.This test is just so hilariously accurate and pegs a lot of otherwise intangible dynamics of human existence that we all know to be true through experience, but are difficult to explain with science (for example, why women (feelers) consistently suck so badly at math and science (a "thinking" pursuit)...INTP's are clearly the superior breed. I mean, we have Socrates, Descartes, Pascal, Newton and Albert ****ing Einstein for christs sake. The rest of you "feeling" assholes simply exist as vermin in a human condition that we pioneer and inevitably, define. If I ever become ruler of all the world, I will base my genocide program around the results of this test.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your personality type is INFP.Introverted (I) 100% Extraverted (E) 0%Intuitive (N) 82% Sensing (S) 18%Feeling (F) 70% Thinking (T) 30%Perceiving (P) 91% Judging (J) 9%Introvert, iNtuitive, Feeler, Perceiver (INFP)INFPs represent between 4 and 5% of the U.S. populationINFPs value inner harmony above all else. Sensitive, idealistic, and loyal, they have a strong sense of honor concerning their personal values and are often passionately committed to making sure their beliefs and actions are congruent. INFPs are also extremely perceptive about people. They value their uniqueness and typically seek unconventional ways of doing things. Sensitive and empathetic, INFPs tend to be exceptionally adept at reading between the lines. Although they demonstrate cool reserve on the outside, INFPs care deeply inside. They are compassionate, sympathetic, understanding and very sensitive to the feelings of others. They avoid conflict and are not interested in impressing or dominating others unless their values are at stake. INFPs seldom express the intensity of their feelings and often appear reticent and calm. However, once they know you, they are enthusiastic and warm. Feeling truly understood and respected for their unique perspective and strong values is important for many INFPs.INFPs Tend To Be:• Deeply committed to work and a vision they believe in• Adaptable & patient• Creative, resourceful & naturally curious• Highly diplomatic consensus builders• Perceptive about others’ needs & motivations• Able to "think outside the box" & see possibilitiesCareer SatisfiersAll people are most satisfied and successful when using their natural talents in an environment that is consistent with their personality preferences and values. Research shows that INFPs are most satisfied by jobs that provide the following:• Supportive, meaningful relationships with a small group of co-workers• A role in helping others grow & develop their fullest potential• A tension-free, collaborative work environment• Work that is consistent with their strong, personal values• A role that does not involve public speaking, or disciplining othersi've pretty much been some degree of INFP on every meyers-briggs test i've ever taken, but usually i'm closer to 50/50 on the thinking/feeling criterion than 30/70.scram, fwiw, i would fly pretty much directly in the face of your math/science v. "feelers" hypothesis.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Holy crap man. How did you even get out of your head to make this post?! I thought qyayqi and I were up there at 96% and 89% respectively, but jeez.
haha, the "I" part is pretty much 100% on every test i've ever taken.
Link to post
Share on other sites
scram, fwiw, i would fly pretty much directly in the face of your math/science v. "feelers" hypothesis.
It does speak directly to the old maxim about leftism being based on feelings and emotions rather than thought and analysis. I would bet an unlimited sum- sell everything I owned to cover the action- that if you took 100 "liberals" and and 100 Libertarians and put them all to this test, the liberals would tilt massively towards "feelers" while the libertarians would be almost exclusively "thinkers".This test is the most genius illustration of this that I've ever seen.. It totally pegs the stuff we all know and have seen first hand our entire lives, but that can be difficult to prove since it's very intuitive as opposed to being purely factual. This test lays a factual, quantifiable foundation for being able to say something like "women run on emotion rather than logic" or "liberals value feelings over reason". It's no wonder that it's 'validity' is questioned. Pretty much no doubt the sort of person who is doing the 'questioning'. It's one of those things that speaks directly to fundamental truths that a certain sect of people absolutely hate and will do everything to obfuscate or deny... This is the most spectacularly accurate "general personality" type test I've ever seen.
Link to post
Share on other sites
It does speak directly to the old maxim about leftism being based on feelings and emotions rather than thought and analysis. I would bet an unlimited sum- sell everything I owned to cover the action- that if you took 100 "liberals" and and 100 Libertarians and put them all to this test, the liberals would tilt massively towards "feelers" while the libertarians would be almost exclusively "thinkers".This test is the most genius illustration of this that I've ever seen.. It totally pegs the stuff we all know and have seen first hand our entire lives, but that can be difficult to prove since it's very intuitive as opposed to being purely factual. This test lays a factual, quantifiable foundation for being able to say something like "women run on emotion rather than logic" or "liberals value feelings over reason". It's no wonder that it's 'validity' is questioned. Pretty much no doubt the sort of person who is doing the 'questioning'. It's one of those things that speaks directly to fundamental truths that a certain sect of people absolutely hate and will do everything to obfuscate or deny... This is the most spectacularly accurate "general personality" type test I've ever seen.
i actually think the test is quite accurate. i wasn't questioning that at all, but rather your "feeling vs. math and science" claim. there's a big difference between a stance that "feeling" is just as or more valuable than "thinking" and being unable to do the latter. as i'm sure you know, i happen to believe that there are altogether logical grounds for leaning toward the left, and i'd be glad to argue that conservative fiscal policies are entirely illogical on multiple levels. you know, if you're bored with psychology and want to go there.
Link to post
Share on other sites
i'd be glad to argue that conservative fiscal policies are entirely illogical on multiple levels. you know, if you're bored with psychology and want to go there.
What is there to argue about? It isn't like you take some innovative or unique line on this stuff. It's all pretty textbook. You believe that "wealth" is simply a function of the state and that smarter, harder working people who earn more 'owe more' so dumber, lazier people can can be 'helped'... or, so the workings of society can be funded on their backs. You believe that successful people are simply the beasts of burden who exist to fund the larger "system" and have no value or rights as individual achievers. You will probably disagree with the descriptors I use to outline your beliefs, but insofar as I've read them, it absolutely illustrates the underlying logic of your position and is pretty standard with most all left-leaning types who don't value anything having to do with the individual. I believe that the best way to manage a country is to fund systems that are essential for commercial productivity/defense, and leave most everything beyond that up to the individual. If you don't swim, you sink. No work, no eat. I shouldn't bear an obligation to subsidize your "feelings" via forcible taxation, just because you happen to be a 'feeler' rather than a thinker. Life isn't fair. That I'm smarter than the homeless bum doesn't mean I "owe" him anything... and just because the guy who lives in a $10,000,000 home in Winnetka is probably smarter than me, that doesn't mean he "owes" me anything either, or should be made to pay a proportionally higher portion of his income than I do just because he's been more successful... and in the event he isn't smarter than me? If he's just some idiot-son inheritor or a professional poker player who happens to enjoy wealth because of an esoteric but otherwise completely useless skill set? Lucky him. I still don't believe that he "owes more" to the kitty on the basis of his personal good fortunes. "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." (- WC) is about as succinct as I've ever seen it put.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Notice how women (and effeminate men) aren't "thinkers" but rather, "feelers". My girl took the test today: 85% "feeling" while I was 85% "thinking". Also, I would book unlimited action that people who are "feelers" are prone to voting a certain way, while "thinkers" are prone to voting another.This test is just so hilariously accurate and pegs a lot of otherwise intangible dynamics of human existence that we all know to be true through experience, but are difficult to explain with science (for example, why women (feelers) consistently suck so badly at math and science (a "thinking" pursuit)...INTP's are clearly the superior breed. I mean, we have Socrates, Descartes, Pascal, Newton and Albert ****ing Einstein for christs sake. The rest of you "feeling" assholes simply exist as vermin in a human condition that we pioneer and inevitably, define. If I ever become ruler of all the world, I will base my genocide program around the results of this test.
hang on there AmScray ; I am a women and it has me as a thinker and I exceled in the scienceshey VB: I really wonder the accuracy as well when I look at checky's and qyayqi
Link to post
Share on other sites
hang on there AmScray ; I am a women and it has me as a thinker and I exceled in the sciences
You're an outlier. It's why I like you. I recognize stuff about you that most of these droolers don't. Some people make fun of you because of your unusual way of communicating, but they're wrong and, more than likely, retards themselves, so ignore them.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You're an outlier. It's why I like you. I recognize stuff about you that most of these droolers don't. Some people make fun of you because of your unusual way of communicating, but they're wrong and, more than likely, retards themselves, so ignore them.
thx for the compliament just thinking of some of the tools that we use at work which VB would use as well.there are more updated tools. it's hard to believe someone would score 100%but it is possible, and I had seen 1 or 2. It is a rarity. I am pegged about 95% accurate.
Link to post
Share on other sites
interesting. my result is always INTJ, and i thought the synopsis on it fairly accurate.
you most likely are INTJ and checky is what he isjust surprised that you scored high 90's on 2 of the 4 area's and hescored 100% which surprising to see.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You're an outlier. It's why I like you. I recognize stuff about you that most of these droolers don't. Some people make fun of you because of your unusual way of communicating, but they're wrong and, more than likely, retards themselves, so ignore them.
Im female too and it said thinker :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
Ya think?
LOL mine below.Your personality type is ENTP.Extraverted (E) 82%Introverted (I) 18%Intuitive (N) 68%Sensing (S) 32%Thinking (T) 60%Feeling (F) 40%Perceiving (P) 55%Judging (J) 45%
Link to post
Share on other sites
It's no wonder that it's 'validity' is questioned. Pretty much no doubt the sort of person who is doing the 'questioning'. It's one of those things that speaks directly to fundamental truths that a certain sect of people absolutely hate and will do everything to obfuscate or deny... This is the most spectacularly accurate "general personality" type test I've ever seen.
When I say its validity is questioned I mean that from the perspective of psychological science which is looking to hold the theory to a different kind of standard than just "yeah that seems to fit". The main issue with meyers-briggs is with the underlying constructs; they are formed from assumptions rather than from a theory with empirical support. For example, take the Sensing/Intuition dimension: the assumption here is that there is a unidimensional scale along which people vary which is well-described by this scale. But the reality is much more complex when it comes to information-processing approaches (e.g. you can easily find someone with the qualities of both end of the scale) and the way that personality traits organize themselves doesn't really seem to be best captured statistically by this set of personality dimensions. The test is "accurate" in the sense that it returns to you the information which it collects. (Do you like to talk to other people? Are you social? OK, you are a talk-to-others socializer!) But it is not revealing of some hidden structure of personality, and it does not capture the sources of variability across the population in a way that makes it useful to psychologists (I do not know anyone who seriously uses this test for anything in psychological science. The modern workhorse of personality tests is the MMPI ).
Link to post
Share on other sites
If I ever become ruler of all the world, I will base my genocide program around the results of this test.
Whew, thank christ I scored correct. I assume, naturally, that you'll make exceptions for female feelers, otherwise we're fcked as a species.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your personality type is ISFJ.Introverted (I) 57% Extraverted (E) 43%Sensing (S) 64% Intuitive (N) 36%Feeling (F) 55% Thinking (T) 45%Judging (J) 73% Perceiving (P) 27%Possible Career Paths for the ISFJ: * Interior Decorators * Designers * Nurses * Administrators and Managers * Administrative Assistants * Child Care / Early Childhood Development * Social Work / Counselors * Paralegals * Clergy / Religious Workers * Office Managers * Shopkeepers * Bookkeepers * Home Economics * StuntmanThis thing is really accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We used the MMIP2 , the MMPI is the Minnesota Multiphaspic Personality Inventory there is 1 and 2 it's more for a diagnosis tool, use to find pathlogicial illnesses,disorders and problems. The MMPI is a test that has over 500 questions. It's usually used along with what we call a SCID which is a guide we used to determine a more refined diagnoisis. They have many more tests done as well by the Psych team. Plus any medicial work up's The Nurses on my unit are becoming more stressed out because we are doing daily scales on our pts. for anxiety, depression, mania, anger, and memory we also do the SCID's. Which takes more time from our other duties. In team meetings All the tests results are reviewed and a discussion is held. Then a Plan of care is made for the pt. with a diagnosis if any made. When that is done the pt. is shipped back to Jail with a full report and recommendations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...