Jump to content

What Was The Russian Guy Saying Wsop


Recommended Posts

anyone know what he was saying? It didnt look like he was talking to Michael Carroll either

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he probably said something like "I want some fucking oreos. Did you assholes hear me? I want some damn OREOSSSS"

Link to post
Share on other sites
saying hi to some chick he saw at the Muckleshoot casino
I have only been there like 5 times since then, haven't seen her since
Link to post
Share on other sites

"I'll Pump fake if I want bitches"I love the Muckleshoot...Hit a royal there and won high hand. Plus it was good to be in Auburn even if it was in Washington.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Michael Carol should have stayed out of the discussion. It wasn't fair to the Russian since Carol was the one saying how far he pushed his chips out. Carol was showing the TD an inch or two further than the actual event. Why wouldn't forward motion count?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Why wouldn't forward motion count?
Because they're not using a forward motion rule?The forward motion thing varies from casino to casino. So use forward motion, some use a betting line, some use "past your cards" and the WSOP apparently uses a "cut & released" rule. This just mean you can pickup 10 chips in your hand, move the forward, cut out 5 and bring 5 back. That's pretty common actually and I doubt anyone would have a problem with it. But sliding a stack forward and then bringing it back is kind of a different thing. I don't really think that "how far" the chips went made any difference in the ruling. They were certainly far enough to elicit a reaction which is the whole point of rules like this anyway.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Because they're not using a forward motion rule?The forward motion thing varies from casino to casino. So use forward motion, some use a betting line, some use "past your cards" and the WSOP apparently uses a "cut & released" rule. This just mean you can pickup 10 chips in your hand, move the forward, cut out 5 and bring 5 back. That's pretty common actually and I doubt anyone would have a problem with it. But sliding a stack forward and then bringing it back is kind of a different thing. I don't really think that "how far" the chips went made any difference in the ruling. They were certainly far enough to elicit a reaction which is the whole point of rules like this anyway.
Yeah, I would agree that the "cut and release" is a completely different motion than what he did. The cut and release is picking up a stack of chips in your hand, and placing them forward in the betting area, only dropping those you want to bet: like if you have a stack of 5k chips and want to bet 25k you drop down a smaller stack of 5 chips and then withdraw your hand with the extra or if you are betting 40k dropping two stacks of 4 chips side by side and taking the remaining chips back, having never left your hand. Sliding a stack forward into the betting area and then withdrawling it, then taking half the stack off the top and placing it into the betting area is not "cutting and releasing."
Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought Michael Carroll should have stayed out of the discussion. It wasn't fair to the Russian since Carol was the one saying how far he pushed his chips out. Carol was showing the TD an inch or two further than the actual event. Why wouldn't forward motion count?
at least i think thats the spelling.I dont think he was out of line here. I think had he challenged the bet in the first place, he would since he isnt in the hand. But after the TDs get called over I think he has a right to say what he think happened. But I could be wrong.....
Link to post
Share on other sites
if you want to see this river card you're gonna stop speakin f*ckin sputnic
lol damn it i was just about to add this since nobody else had.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still interested as to what he said in Russian, it must of been bad because ESPN was bleeping it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found my answer, thats pretty horrible at the things he said. But to his defense, it was unintentional (string bet) but yet they kept indirectly needling him and insulting him imo. Guy barely understands or speaks English.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I found my answer, thats pretty horrible at the things he said. But to his defense, it was unintentional (string bet) but yet they kept indirectly needling him and insulting him imo. Guy barely understands or speaks English.
Care to share?
Link to post
Share on other sites

theres a thread about it on the the 2+2 section, this was someones translation that was backed up by othersGo **** yourselves, you, ******s!"And then:"And you, ******s mug, shut up most of all". ---this was to Michael Carroll

Link to post
Share on other sites
theres a thread about it on the the 2+2 section, this was someones translation that was backed up by othersGo **** yourselves, you, ******s!"And then:"And you, ******s mug, shut up most of all". ---this was to Michael Carroll
Ah, thanks. Yeah, that definitely deserves a penalty.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...