TheL0st1ne 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 I think mentioning the names is enough. I also think any competent player won't play a SNG with 2 or more similar players of the same name.When i wanna play a SnG, I click it and hit the 'register' button. I, along with what I believe is the high percantage of players, dont look in the lobby to see if two players have similar names. Link to post Share on other sites
Tehtoe 3 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 I've yet to see a SNG with the option of getting up from the table and getting your money back if you see two people with similar names sitting.Except not registering or something. Link to post Share on other sites
AdamDarv 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Author Share Posted October 21, 2008 I'm gonna try and ruin these guys. Wish me luck.Nice work Jeff Link to post Share on other sites
outsider13 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Those guys are serious meatheads! How FTP support doesn't do anything immediate is pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 neither of them cashed so im pretty sure that it is not a big deal..... fulltil probably knows they/he is cheating but are like "**** it, they lose anyways" Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 I think mentioning the names is enough. I also think any competent player won't play a SNG with 2 or more similar players of the same name.completely untrue. I doubt name of opponents would factor into anyone's decision as to whether or not to play in a SNG Link to post Share on other sites
FARGOpokerND 22 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 completely untrue. I doubt name of opponents would factor into anyone's decision as to whether or not to play in a SNGNow that is just a false statement. I, for one, would not reg if i saw 2 names like the 2 in the OP.So completely untrue is wrong.EDIT: If you saw Addilac299 Addilac298 and Addilac300 regged for a tourney...I doubt you would play Link to post Share on other sites
Tehtoe 3 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 completely untrue. I doubt name of opponents would factor into anyone's decision as to whether or not to play in a SNGGo ahead and play with xxx1, xxx2, and xxx3. Link to post Share on other sites
outsider13 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Now that is just a false statement. I, for one, would not reg if i saw 2 names like the 2 in the OP.So completely untrue is wrong.EDIT: If you saw Addilac299 Addilac298 and Addilac300 regged for a tourney...I doubt you would playI'd definitely be in!! That's hot. Link to post Share on other sites
rcooj_7 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 alright, its heckle time, i found one at a sng....... Link to post Share on other sites
king1305 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Now that is just a false statement. I, for one, would not reg if i saw 2 names like the 2 in the OP.So completely untrue is wrong.EDIT: If you saw Addilac299 Addilac298 and Addilac300 regged for a tourney...I doubt you would playI'd play...three huge fish in one sng? I'm def in!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
FARGOpokerND 22 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 I'd play...three huge fish in one sng? I'm def in!!!!!!still dead to me Link to post Share on other sites
sennin 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 I'd play...three huge fish in one sng? I'm def in!!!!!!+1 Link to post Share on other sites
Largetotals 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 +1so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head* Link to post Share on other sites
Largetotals 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Those guys are serious meatheads! How FTP support doesn't do anything immediate is pathetic.I agree.. its not like there isn't evidence to support it..very bizarre that they haven't stepped up to the plate and take them out.. Link to post Share on other sites
sennin 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head*they can jack up the pots all the want, Ill be in there to scoop it all with the nuts.im not saying i'd purposely play with them every chance I get, but I wouldnt avoid playing sngs just because they are Link to post Share on other sites
RDog 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head*Hell, for most of the people that have posted in this thread I would help get extra accounts if they promised to play at my tables. Link to post Share on other sites
king1305 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Hell, for most of the people that have posted in this thread I would help get extra accounts if they promised to play at my tables.Including, but not limited to:King1305. Link to post Share on other sites
Tehtoe 3 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head*WOOOOOSH Link to post Share on other sites
RDog 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Can someone send out the bat alert to let me know when these clowns are playing so I can bust their rolls? Link to post Share on other sites
Largetotals 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 WOOOOOSHnothing went over my head kid.. the post in question seemed like they legitimately wanted to play em..and I, either in ignorance or lack of comprehension, cannot see the benefit of trying to play 3 people who are all talking, sharing and playing together.. Link to post Share on other sites
outsider13 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 They are dumping cash in NLHE cash games now.Full Tilt Poker Game #8583323984: Table FTP Forum (deep) - $0.10/$0.25 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:41:41 ET - 2008/10/20Seat 3: im a beast nh ($71.25)Seat 6: im so a beast ($28.25)im so a beast posts the small blind of $0.10im a beast nh posts the big blind of $0.25The button is in seat #6*** HOLE CARDS ***im so a beast has 15 seconds left to actim so a beast raises to $23.75im a beast nh calls $23.50*** FLOP *** [3h 4h 2s]im a beast nh has 15 seconds left to actim a beast nh bets $5.25im so a beast foldsUncalled bet of $5.25 returned to im a beast nhim a beast nh mucksim a beast nh wins the pot ($47)*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $47.50 | Rake $0.50Board: [3h 4h 2s]Seat 3: im a beast nh (big blind) collected ($47), muckedSeat 6: im so a beast (small blind) folded on the Flop Link to post Share on other sites
outsider13 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 And they are on a register list for a $22 sng on FTP Link to post Share on other sites
tuckermitchell 1 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 They are dumping cash in NLHE cash games now.Full Tilt Poker Game #8583323984: Table FTP Forum (deep) - $0.10/$0.25 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:41:41 ET - 2008/10/20Seat 3: im a beast nh ($71.25)Seat 6: im so a beast ($28.25)im so a beast posts the small blind of $0.10im a beast nh posts the big blind of $0.25The button is in seat #6*** HOLE CARDS ***im so a beast has 15 seconds left to actim so a beast raises to $23.75im a beast nh calls $23.50*** FLOP *** [3h 4h 2s]im a beast nh has 15 seconds left to actim a beast nh bets $5.25im so a beast foldsUncalled bet of $5.25 returned to im a beast nhim a beast nh mucksim a beast nh wins the pot ($47)*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $47.50 | Rake $0.50Board: [3h 4h 2s]Seat 3: im a beast nh (big blind) collected ($47), muckedSeat 6: im so a beast (small blind) folded on the FlopFWIW, they obv can't use the "we didn't know it was wrong" excuse since they aren't just transferring money back and forth and instead are just dumping it Link to post Share on other sites
RDog 0 Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 nothing went over my head kid.. the post in question seemed like they legitimately wanted to play em..and I, either in ignorance or lack of comprehension, cannot see the benefit of trying to play 3 people who are all talking, sharing and playing together..It did in fact go over your head if you go back and read the trail of posts that the +1 was referring to. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now