Jump to content

Collusion On Ftp


Recommended Posts

I think mentioning the names is enough. I also think any competent player won't play a SNG with 2 or more similar players of the same name.
When i wanna play a SnG, I click it and hit the 'register' button. I, along with what I believe is the high percantage of players, dont look in the lobby to see if two players have similar names.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I've yet to see a SNG with the option of getting up from the table and getting your money back if you see two people with similar names sitting.
Except not registering or something.
Link to post
Share on other sites

neither of them cashed so im pretty sure that it is not a big deal..... fulltil probably knows they/he is cheating but are like "**** it, they lose anyways"

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think mentioning the names is enough. I also think any competent player won't play a SNG with 2 or more similar players of the same name.
completely untrue. I doubt name of opponents would factor into anyone's decision as to whether or not to play in a SNG
Link to post
Share on other sites
completely untrue. I doubt name of opponents would factor into anyone's decision as to whether or not to play in a SNG
Now that is just a false statement. I, for one, would not reg if i saw 2 names like the 2 in the OP.So completely untrue is wrong.EDIT: If you saw Addilac299 Addilac298 and Addilac300 regged for a tourney...I doubt you would play
Link to post
Share on other sites
completely untrue. I doubt name of opponents would factor into anyone's decision as to whether or not to play in a SNG
Go ahead and play with xxx1, xxx2, and xxx3.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that is just a false statement. I, for one, would not reg if i saw 2 names like the 2 in the OP.So completely untrue is wrong.EDIT: If you saw Addilac299 Addilac298 and Addilac300 regged for a tourney...I doubt you would play
I'd definitely be in!! That's hot.
Link to post
Share on other sites

alright, its heckle time, i found one at a sng.......

Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that is just a false statement. I, for one, would not reg if i saw 2 names like the 2 in the OP.So completely untrue is wrong.EDIT: If you saw Addilac299 Addilac298 and Addilac300 regged for a tourney...I doubt you would play
I'd play...three huge fish in one sng? I'm def in!!!!!!
Link to post
Share on other sites
so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head*
they can jack up the pots all the want, Ill be in there to scoop it all with the nuts.im not saying i'd purposely play with them every chance I get, but I wouldnt avoid playing sngs just because they are
Link to post
Share on other sites
so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head*
Hell, for most of the people that have posted in this thread I would help get extra accounts if they promised to play at my tables.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hell, for most of the people that have posted in this thread I would help get extra accounts if they promised to play at my tables.
Including, but not limited to:King1305.
Link to post
Share on other sites
so 3 guys who are definitely sharing hole cards, folding to each other on purpose and jacking up pots..all together..you would still play em?*shakes head*
WOOOOOSH
Link to post
Share on other sites
WOOOOOSH
nothing went over my head kid.. the post in question seemed like they legitimately wanted to play em..and I, either in ignorance or lack of comprehension, cannot see the benefit of trying to play 3 people who are all talking, sharing and playing together..
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are dumping cash in NLHE cash games now.Full Tilt Poker Game #8583323984: Table FTP Forum (deep) - $0.10/$0.25 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:41:41 ET - 2008/10/20Seat 3: im a beast nh ($71.25)Seat 6: im so a beast ($28.25)im so a beast posts the small blind of $0.10im a beast nh posts the big blind of $0.25The button is in seat #6*** HOLE CARDS ***im so a beast has 15 seconds left to actim so a beast raises to $23.75im a beast nh calls $23.50*** FLOP *** [3h 4h 2s]im a beast nh has 15 seconds left to actim a beast nh bets $5.25im so a beast foldsUncalled bet of $5.25 returned to im a beast nhim a beast nh mucksim a beast nh wins the pot ($47)*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $47.50 | Rake $0.50Board: [3h 4h 2s]Seat 3: im a beast nh (big blind) collected ($47), muckedSeat 6: im so a beast (small blind) folded on the Flop

Link to post
Share on other sites
They are dumping cash in NLHE cash games now.Full Tilt Poker Game #8583323984: Table FTP Forum (deep) - $0.10/$0.25 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:41:41 ET - 2008/10/20Seat 3: im a beast nh ($71.25)Seat 6: im so a beast ($28.25)im so a beast posts the small blind of $0.10im a beast nh posts the big blind of $0.25The button is in seat #6*** HOLE CARDS ***im so a beast has 15 seconds left to actim so a beast raises to $23.75im a beast nh calls $23.50*** FLOP *** [3h 4h 2s]im a beast nh has 15 seconds left to actim a beast nh bets $5.25im so a beast foldsUncalled bet of $5.25 returned to im a beast nhim a beast nh mucksim a beast nh wins the pot ($47)*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $47.50 | Rake $0.50Board: [3h 4h 2s]Seat 3: im a beast nh (big blind) collected ($47), muckedSeat 6: im so a beast (small blind) folded on the Flop
FWIW, they obv can't use the "we didn't know it was wrong" excuse since they aren't just transferring money back and forth and instead are just dumping it
Link to post
Share on other sites
nothing went over my head kid.. the post in question seemed like they legitimately wanted to play em..and I, either in ignorance or lack of comprehension, cannot see the benefit of trying to play 3 people who are all talking, sharing and playing together..
It did in fact go over your head if you go back and read the trail of posts that the +1 was referring to.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...