Jambizzle 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 pretty sure this is #1PEN on starsIndeed it is.GLGL Daniel, keep doing work etc.PS. BULLLLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDOOOOOOZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! Link to post Share on other sites
rcgs59 15 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Negreanu Takes One off the DevilfishDavid "Devilfish" Ulliott opened for 8,000 and Daniel Negreanu called from the small blind. The flop was A hearts, 8 Diamonds, 3 Hearts . Negreanu checked, Devilfish bet 12,000 and Negreanu called. The turn brought the 6 clubs and both players checked. The river was the 6 hearts , followed by two more checks. Negreanu showed Q clubs, Q hearts and Devilfish mucked Link to post Share on other sites
dr_karl 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 its dinner break right now..i think Daniel has above 300k.. xDbut i'm waiting for him to post something here xDlike he did the previous days.. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Some sick luckboxing here:Godsend For TownsendBrian Townsend has enjoyed a full double-up to 205,000 courtesy of Peter Neff. The board read Td 8c 7d 8h 9s and Townsend was holding 6s6d for the turned straight. Neff mucked, and is down to 235,000.Dummy end of a str8 and 5 overs on the board for the double up with 66 lol. Must have been AIPFNice life... Link to post Share on other sites
dr_karl 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 correction : Daniel has probably? above 400k.. sry Link to post Share on other sites
Derooger 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 1 Justin 'BoostedJ' Smith 4500002 Talal Shakerchi 4290003 Daniel Negreanu 4100004 Chris 'Moorman1' Moorman 3200005 Scott Fischman 2900006 John Juanda 2830007 Chris Elliott 2650008 Andy Bloch 2620009 Johnny Lodden 24500010 Mike Matusow 240000not sure if this is official Link to post Share on other sites
DanielNegreanu 141 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I got 444,400 and could have had more in a pot with DevilFish. He raised I called from SB with KJ. Flop J-9-2 I check, he bets 15k, I raise tro 45k, he goes all in for like 30k more. He shows J-10, turn Ace, river 2- chop it up. All is well though, nap time now and then I'll continue to cruise. As for the question, it is not a coincidence that I'm often able to maintain a big stack for longer stretches while a player like Hoyt can dominate with one- or be the next one out, lol. There is no question that the small ball approach works even better when you have a big stack. The bigger the better. It allows you the freedom of sticking to the "system" and not bluffing. I swear to you, I attempted one bluff yesterday and that's the only one I've tried the whole tournament. With a big stack, there is no need for unnecessary risk in marginal situations. I promise you I'm right, plus, iwith an amazing structure the small ball approach is unquestionably the absolute best and most consistent approach to winning big tournaments. Link to post Share on other sites
Jrobb25 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I got 444,400 and could have had more in a pot with DevilFish. He raised I called from SB with KJ. Flop J-9-2 I check, he bets 15k, I raise tro 45k, he goes all in for like 30k more. He shows J-10, turn Ace, river 2- chop it up. All is well though, nap time now and then I'll continue to cruise. As for the question, it is not a coincidence that I'm often able to maintain a big stack for longer stretches while a player like Hoyt can dominate with one- or be the next one out, lol. There is no question that the small ball approach works even better when you have a big stack. The bigger the better. It allows you the freedom of sticking to the "system" and not bluffing. I swear to you, I attempted one bluff yesterday and that's the only one I've tried the whole tournament. With a big stack, there is no need for unnecessary risk in marginal situations. I promise you I'm right, plus, iwith an amazing structure the small ball approach is unquestionably the absolute best and most consistent approach to winning big tournaments.In other words....Check out Poker VT...15% off right now!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
cubsfan44 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I got 444,400 and could have had more in a pot with DevilFish. He raised I called from SB with KJ. Flop J-9-2 I check, he bets 15k, I raise tro 45k, he goes all in for like 30k more. He shows J-10, turn Ace, river 2- chop it up. All is well though, nap time now and then I'll continue to cruise. As for the question, it is not a coincidence that I'm often able to maintain a big stack for longer stretches while a player like Hoyt can dominate with one- or be the next one out, lol. There is no question that the small ball approach works even better when you have a big stack. The bigger the better. It allows you the freedom of sticking to the "system" and not bluffing. I swear to you, I attempted one bluff yesterday and that's the only one I've tried the whole tournament. With a big stack, there is no need for unnecessary risk in marginal situations. I promise you I'm right, plus, iwith an amazing structure the small ball approach is unquestionably the absolute best and most consistent approach to winning big tournaments.At this point you mind as well just go and win the whole damn thing. GL Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Rock on, DN!!! Link to post Share on other sites
king_tanner 84 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 All Quiet On The Western Fr....Oh, Wait A Sec...In the main room, it's been fairly quiet also, only the riffling of chips would allow you to know a poker tournament is going on. There are not too many hands going to showdown, while on Table 3 we've hardly seen a hand that made it to the flop... Though just as I am typing this Phil Laak is getting up out of his chair wishing everyone good luck. It seems Daniel Negreanu is the recipient of his chips as his T 9 hit the 7x7xjxTxTx board better than Laak's A Q leaving Kid Poker to stack his chips.Id like to see how they played this hand on each street. Laak must have not heard Daniel's memo yesterday when he said he wasn't bluffing. Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I got 444,400 and could have had more in a pot with DevilFish. He raised I called from SB with KJ. Flop J-9-2 I check, he bets 15k, I raise tro 45k, he goes all in for like 30k more. He shows J-10, turn Ace, river 2- chop it up. All is well though, nap time now and then I'll continue to cruise. As for the question, it is not a coincidence that I'm often able to maintain a big stack for longer stretches while a player like Hoyt can dominate with one- or be the next one out, lol. There is no question that the small ball approach works even better when you have a big stack. The bigger the better. It allows you the freedom of sticking to the "system" and not bluffing. I swear to you, I attempted one bluff yesterday and that's the only one I've tried the whole tournament. With a big stack, there is no need for unnecessary risk in marginal situations. I promise you I'm right, plus, iwith an amazing structure the small ball approach is unquestionably the absolute best and most consistent approach to winning big tournaments.nice. Win please.In other words....Check out Poker VT...15% off right now!!!!LOL Link to post Share on other sites
dr_karl 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 LOL from mine too^^take it down Daniel Link to post Share on other sites
FARGOpokerND 22 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 LOL from mine too^^take it down Daniel wat Link to post Share on other sites
HighwayStar 8 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 watlol ;)xDGooooo James Keys! Link to post Share on other sites
outsider13 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 watYou heard the man!!! xD Coolers Link to post Share on other sites
rcgs59 15 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Johnny Lodden 547000 Justin 'BoostedJ' Smith 480000 Talal Shakerchi 450000 Daniel Negreanu 440000 John Juanda 350000 Andy Bloch 280000 Mike Matusow 278000 Erik Seidel 248000 Chris Elliott 242000 Peter Neff 235000 Scott Fischman 230000 Peter Turmezey 227000 Perttu Bergius 216000 Toni Hiltunen 215000 Ivan Demidov 212000 Link to post Share on other sites
FARGOpokerND 22 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I, personally, would like to see Ivan Demidov go VERY deep because he is one of the "November 9" and that would be cool hype to see if he could final table both main events.If he were to win the WSOPE....the thought of holding both WSOP ME titles in same year is something many people would like to follow. Link to post Share on other sites
EdwardGreene1 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Bubble busted, 3 out of 4 events cashed for DN. Good work.Now go win the whole f*****g thing. Link to post Share on other sites
I_fold08 1 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Bubble busted, 3 out of 4 events cashed for DN. Good work.Now go when the whole f*****g thing.when? Link to post Share on other sites
EdwardGreene1 0 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 when?Edited per your approval lol Link to post Share on other sites
I_fold08 1 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Edited per your approval lolapproved lol Link to post Share on other sites
Derooger 0 Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 Three TablesHere's our new lineup:Table 1Seat 1: Soren KongsgaardSeat 2: Brandon AdamsSeat 3: Chris ElliottSeat 4: Panicos PanaxiSeat 5: Erik SeidelSeat 6: Johnny LoddenSeat 7: Scott FischmanSeat 8: Brian TownsendSeat 9: Ivan DemidovTable 2Seat 1: Perttu BergiusSeat 2: Daniel NegreanuSeat 3: Talal ShakerchiSeat 4: Justin SmithSeat 5: Stanislav AlekhinSeat 6: Mike MatusowSeat 7: Harri PehkonenSeat 8: Philippe RouasSeat 9: Bengt SonnertTable 3Seat 1: Mel JudahSeat 2: Toni HiltunenSeat 3: Kim-Andre TorsvikSeat 4: Robin KestonSeat 5: Tim WestSeat 6: John JuandaSeat 7: Peter NeffSeat 8: Andy BlochSeat 9: William Haughey Link to post Share on other sites
ThreeBet 0 Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 Man, that is some frickin list!Talk about depth ... we don't see too many final 3 tables looking like that! Link to post Share on other sites
Largetotals 0 Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 Man, that is some frickin list!Talk about depth ... we don't see too many final 3 tables looking like that!good call.. there is some seriously talented players on each table.the final table could be frightening! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now