Most Interesting Table?

[Mesisca 0]

its got to be one of these, hopefully the bellande/hellmuth table doesnt make the tv table as interesting as that may be aside from the poker.O13-1: Haysam Chiniara - 79500O13-2: Sigurd Eskeland - 399500O13-3: Dustin Holmes - 734000O13-4: Joe Bishop - 247500O13-5: Jon Turner - 726500O13-6: JP Kelly - 217000O13-7: Lawrence Jacobs - 141500O13-8: Adam Schoenfeld - 200000O13-9: David Angel - 164000Holmes and Turner top stacks and schoenfeld at the table as well, wouldnt mind watching this oneO28-1: Robert Mizrachi - 138000O28-2: Danny Fuhs - 320000O28-3: Jiri Hlavaty - 235000O28-4: Marcelo Dabus - 159000O28-5: Steve Billirakis - 124000O28-6: Salomon Sutton - 225500O28-7: Cliff Josephy - 59000O28-8: William Soffin - 294500O28-9: Tri Nguyen - 370000mizrachi billirakis and josephy that would be interesting to watch as well.

[Pot Odds RAC 23]

Sort of a niave question here. Do the tourney directors "stack" the tables for "interest"? Or is seating entirely random? I'd be a little PO'd if I was an "interesting" Pro and they seated other "Interesting Pros" at my table to generate interest. Doesn't seem fair.

[rdtedm 0]

Sort of a niave question here. Do the tourney directors "stack" the tables for "interest"? Or is seating entirely random? I'd be a little PO'd if I was an "interesting" Pro and they seated other "Interesting Pros" at my table to generate interest. Doesn't seem fair.

Random.

[Gallo 1]

Random.

Not for nothing, but is there actual proof? I mean ESPN is involved and you'd think they would have some kind of vested interest in who is seated with who jst to make for good TV.

[Pokerkid555 0]

There's only less than 500 people left...Having two pros at ONE table together isn't exactly 1 to 100000000 odds. It's totally random or else it would ruin the integrity of the game. I'm positive someone would find out if it wasn't random either. It's totally random.

[Waffles2003 1]

everything in poker is rigged

[Sheiky 0]

Sort of a niave question here. Do the tourney directors "stack" the tables for "interest"? Or is seating entirely random? I'd be a little PO'd if I was an "interesting" Pro and they seated other "Interesting Pros" at my table to generate interest. Doesn't seem fair.

Not for nothing, but is there actual proof? I mean ESPN is involved and you'd think they would have some kind of vested interest in who is seated with who jst to make for good TV.

Well they randomly table select, but the TV table is picked from the randomly selected tables.At the WPT events people were complaining that late registrants were all put on the same table, but that's another matter.

[I_fold08 1]

its got to be one of these, hopefully the bellande/hellmuth table doesnt make the tv table as interesting as that may be aside from the poker.O13-1: Haysam Chiniara - 79500O13-2: Sigurd Eskeland - 399500O13-3: Dustin Holmes - 734000O13-4: Joe Bishop - 247500O13-5: Jon Turner - 726500O13-6: JP Kelly - 217000O13-7: Lawrence Jacobs - 141500O13-8: Adam Schoenfeld - 200000O13-9: David Angel - 164000Holmes and Turner top stacks and schoenfeld at the table as well, wouldnt mind watching this oneO28-1: Robert Mizrachi - 138000O28-2: Danny Fuhs - 320000O28-3: Jiri Hlavaty - 235000O28-4: Marcelo Dabus - 159000O28-5: Steve Billirakis - 124000O28-6: Salomon Sutton - 225500O28-7: Cliff Josephy - 59000O28-8: William Soffin - 294500O28-9: Tri Nguyen - 370000mizrachi billirakis and josephy that would be interesting to watch as well.

Adam schoenfeld is the man, and I agree that would be good for a tv table, but i am not so sure how the second table would do as the featured table, as all of those guys are known to be quiet at the tables.

[Pot Odds RAC 23]

Well they randomly table select, but the TV table is picked from the randomly selected tables.

That is what I would have hoped....and if JRB and Hellmuth are at the same table you can bet that is the TV table.