stevielarson 0 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 according to his blog up 1880 after 1 week. trying to get a new update off someone on justintv Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 according to his blog up 1880 after 1 week. trying to get a new update off someone on justintvHe's still off the needed pace...8 days in and less than 1/5 of the way to his goal is not good......There's 40 days in a month, right...?...anyone?*crickets* Link to post Share on other sites
Snamuh 0 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 He's still off the needed pace...8 days in and less than 1/5 of the way to his goal is not good......There's 40 days in a month, right...?...anyone?*crickets*He'll get there. Link to post Share on other sites
Doug 0 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I was watching last night when he thought he had his mic turned off and he says he was trying to get more action because he figured out he was playing too tight which is when he had that losing streak. Also he is using pokertracker 3 so he thinks he could be +2k~ because PT3 is still bugged.IMO he will win this bet from what i've seen. Link to post Share on other sites
Whatever 1 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I have no doubt he'll get there. Anybody who is trying to get action by offering better odds for BIGGER bets obviously is supremely confident. His last week is gonna be extremely entertaining. Watch. Link to post Share on other sites
Jariso13 1 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I have no doubt he'll get there. Anybody who is trying to get action by offering better odds for BIGGER bets obviously is supremely confident. His last week is gonna be extremely entertaining. Watch.I expect him to play about 90 hours in that last week as well...then sleep the next 3 days lol...Hopefully his mom goes to Costco and buys him a few cases of Red Bull. Link to post Share on other sites
Liquid_Ghost 0 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 I just waded through this thread and I have to say this whole thing is pretty sick. I personally think he is going to fall short, but gl to him.Also, I would suggest taking ADD drugs to stay focused if that is within the rules. Figure with 24 tables he would need all the focus he could muster. Link to post Share on other sites
Jariso13 1 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 Also, I would suggest taking ADD drugs to stay focused if that is within the rules. Figure with 24 tables he would need all the focus he could muster.Nah drugs are against the rules of the bet. Link to post Share on other sites
James D 0 Posted May 30, 2008 Share Posted May 30, 2008 Been keeping track of this quietly, my opinion is he'll just fail... I probably wouldn't bet on it though, I'd have to know a lot more about him (his personality), but I find it hard to believe he is quite the hustler some people in this thread think he is.It's an interesting one. Don't true hustlers try to keep their reputation as quiet as possible? Rather than let most of the internet poker world know that he did a job on everyone who bets against him at this stage.gl to him though. Link to post Share on other sites
cen 0 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 he just wrote in the chat box on justin.tv that he's sitting right around $2,350 right now... Link to post Share on other sites
fighter 4 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 he just wrote in the chat box on justin.tv that he's sitting right around $2,350 right now...all the 10c/25c pros must be at the wsop Link to post Share on other sites
Metternich 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 bump for the best thread on the forums.I put it at 65/35 he makes it, either way it comes down to the last week. He'll either rise to the occasion of collapse and start spewing. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 all the 10c/25c pros must be at the wsopId take a winning .10/.25 online player over 80-90% of the people at the tables in Vegas. Link to post Share on other sites
DunkinDonuts 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 He won't make it. The guy cold-calls all-ins for > 1 buy-in with QQ against people employing the Smasharoo technique. Unless he can keep catching up as a 4:1 underdog, he's in trouble. Link to post Share on other sites
TravisG 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 He won't make it. The guy cold-calls all-ins for > 1 buy-in with QQ against people employing the Smasharoo technique. Unless he can keep catching up as a 4:1 underdog, he's in trouble.yeah, as i said before, that 50k hands breakeven stretch has nothing to do with variance. Link to post Share on other sites
oldmangrimis 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 if a 10c/25c regular sits down with him, and has interests in the bet, then no, the bet still counts. if a $2/$4 regular who has a bet on, or who has a friend/acquaintance/agent etc. that has a bet on with WCGrider, then I think it's take to the 2+2 posters committee and the make a rulingI not saying he is or will do this but if he falls short cant he just get some one that has interests in the bet that is a 2/4 regular to play at his table and the bet is null, so he can never really lose the bet. How about the other side. Can't he get a player to lose money to him at the table and pay them back later. Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 I not saying he is or will do this but if he falls short cant he just get on that has interests in the bet that is a 2/4 regular to play at his table and the bet is null, so he can never really lose the bet. how about the other side. Can't he get player to lose money to him at the table and pay them back later.Huh? Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 I not saying he is or will do this but if he falls short cant he just get on that has interests in the bet that is a 2/4 regular to play at his table and the bet is null, so he can never really lose the bet. how about the other side. Can't he get player to lose money to him at the table and pay them back later.Well if he breaks the rules of the bet, I'm assuming it's called a loss for him and not just no action. Link to post Share on other sites
Jariso13 1 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 I not saying he is or will do this but if he falls short cant he just get on that has interests in the bet that is a 2/4 regular to play at his table and the bet is null, so he can never really lose the bet. how about the other side. Can't he get player to lose money to him at the table and pay them back later.I think what you are trying to say is..."Can this bet be intentionally fixed so that it has to be called off and no one loses?" And the answer is obviously yes...because there are definite ways to do that for both sides on this bet...I am not sure who is the judge as to whether the fixing would be considered material enough to call off the bet...But for this to happen, it would have to be done by people with no integrity so hopefully it will not happen...If it did happen all of the people involved would no longer be respected in the poker community. Link to post Share on other sites
BellaireDrew 2 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 he hasn't posted any updates in his blog since Friday, I wonder how he has been doing. Link to post Share on other sites
JaNnN 0 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 he hasn't posted any updates in his blog since Friday, I wonder how he has been doing.He's in a mental hospital. The tables on his computerscreen were flashing so rapidly he got instant seisures. Link to post Share on other sites
Jariso13 1 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 I think he is around +2100...which is about 800 off the pace. WCG needs to do work. Link to post Share on other sites
Snamuh 0 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 He won't make it. The guy cold-calls all-ins for > 1 buy-in with QQ against people employing the Smasharoo technique. Unless he can keep catching up as a 4:1 underdog, he's in trouble.You're an idiot. That was a misclick. He's a winning 5/10 6 max player, how the hell can you make a comment like that? Link to post Share on other sites
Jariso13 1 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 You're an idiot. That was a misclick. He's a winning 5/10 6 max player, how the hell can you make a comment like that?Yah hes def better than the players he is playing against by a lot...The problem is that he is playing 24 tables for so many hours...It has to have an effect on your game. Link to post Share on other sites
king1305 0 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Sunday, June 1, 2008Day 10 UpdateToday - +580Total - +2700Pace - +3300So I am behind. But not by a ton. A good day tomorow and im back in it =) .~DougStraight from his blog.COME ONNNNNNNNN DOUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now