Jump to content

One More Obama ... Drama ... Bomba ...


Recommended Posts

And don't you think they are dumb?
Yes I do in this instance - I can probably find more instances for Pat, I still need to find the video of his bench-pressing prowess.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes I do in this instance - I can probably find more instances for Pat, I still need to find the video of his bench-pressing prowess.
Then that's like me using Michael Moore as a source for why I am right about something.Which would never happen.Me being right about something I mean
Link to post
Share on other sites

Man the more I hear the more afraid I am of this guy ever getting near the Oral Office.

Obama: "We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK"News Type: Event — Seeded on Mon May 19, 2008 7:37 AM EDT
WTF is wrong with this guy?We should feel guilty?We should do with less because others do? and if we self impose misery and do with less ouselves because somehow that would make it fair-er? and less mean? and we care more and if we do others won't hate us so much??????? Kiss my patootie.The idea that we should be like Europe and care so much what the world thinks that we should always do what the world wants us to do…to take a spineless back seat and let OTHERS DICTATE WHAT THE USA DOES???This is pure Enviro wacko Socialist idealism. Jimmy Carter, part deux! Worst president ever. Obama’s mentality is very much the same, or so it would seem. I've always contended that I sort of like this guy as a person, but I am now convinced that he would do more harm than good as a president. You folks who want change better get ready for some. Because if Obama wins and enacts all this crap this change is going to knock you right on your ass.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Relax Nutz, you have a better chance of being hit by car without leaving your house then that happening.The man means well, he really does. He is one of the most misguided fools I have ever listened to speak, his ideas are so far left that he will have no chance to use them, but he means well. (worthless as that is) As always, the voters in this great but confused land will figure it out... it just takes some of them so much longer to learn.Remember the bottom will suffer much worse then the top!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Relax Nutz, you have a better chance of being hit by car without leaving your house then that happening.The man means well, he really does. He is one of the most misguided fools I have ever listened to speak, his ideas are so far left that he will have no chance to use them, but he means well. (worthless as that is) As always, the voters in this great but confused land will figure it out... it just takes some of them so much longer to learn.Remember the bottom will suffer much worse then the top!!
cooooooooooooooooolWastedDonut.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites
Man the more I hear the more afraid I am of this guy ever getting near the Oral Office.WTF is wrong with this guy?We should feel guilty?We should do with less because others do? and if we self impose misery and do with less ouselves because somehow that would make it fair-er? and less mean? and we care more and if we do others won't hate us so much??????? Kiss my patootie.The idea that we should be like Europe and care so much what the world thinks that we should always do what the world wants us to do…to take a spineless back seat and let OTHERS DICTATE WHAT THE USA DOES???This is pure Enviro wacko Socialist idealism. Jimmy Carter, part deux! Worst president ever. Obama’s mentality is very much the same, or so it would seem. I've always contended that I sort of like this guy as a person, but I am now convinced that he would do more harm than good as a president. You folks who want change better get ready for some. Because if Obama wins and enacts all this crap this change is going to knock you right on your ass.
The sky is falling, the sky is falling..... oh wait, we've had 8 years of one of the most prolific deficit spenders in history. It's already on the ground.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The sky is falling, the sky is falling..... oh wait, we've had 8 years of one of the most prolific deficit spenders in history. It's already on the ground.
If Clinton or Obama were elected the last eight years would seem like child play. Oh Wait....The Democrats are in control of Congress, Never Mind.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Israel and Syria opening up peace talks - wow, two countries talking? What, no right wing comments about those "appeasers" in Israel?Israel Opening Talks with SyriaCNN articleWhat's driving Israel and Syria to talk?Ron KampeasThe renewal of peace talks between Israel and Syria is a sign of widespread concern about the rising power of Hezbollah and Iran, as well as the diminishing fortunes of the Bush administration in its twilight.Published: 05/21/2008WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The diminishing fortunes of the Bush administration and the resurgent fortunes of Hezbollah may be behind the surprising announcement that Syria and Israel are renewing peace talks.The announcements Wednesday by the two countries, which said Israel and Syria would launch talks in Ankara under Turkish auspices, came despite longstanding U.S. opposition to talks with Syria.The news garnered only tepid endorsement from the Bush administration."We were not surprised by it, and we do not object to it," said Dana Perino, the White House spokeswoman. "We hope that this is a forum to address various concerns we all have with Syria -- Syria's support of terrorism, repression of its own people."With Bush nearing the end of his term in office, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert might have felt emboldened to shuck off Bush's longstanding resistance to outreach toward Syria, analysts said."This demonstrates that what has kept things back is the United States," said Steve Spiegel, a professor of political science at UCLA and a scholar at the Israel Policy Forum. Bush’s “leverage is not as great -- Bush has seven-and-a-half months left."The Bush administration long has blamed Syria for not doing enough to keep insurgents from crossing its border into Iraq and for interfering in Lebanese affairs. This month, Hezbollah militiamen backed by Iran routed the U.S.-backed Lebanese army in violent clashes in Beirut, alarming officials in the Bush administration.Syria, analysts said, also may regard Hezbollah's recent political and military gains with alarm -- notwithstanding its longstanding alliance with the Lebanese terrorist group.Syria's alliances in Lebanon have shifted over the decades, from the Christians in the 1970s to the Palestinians to the Sunni Muslims and, over the last decade or so, to Hezbollah's Shiite plurality in the country, noted David Makovsky, a senior analyst with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.But Hezbollah's growing power -- including its resurgence following the 2006 summer war with Israel, its relative strength vis-a-vis the Lebanese army and its success this week in securing a veto in the Lebanese Cabinet -- threaten to undermine the balance of power between Lebanon’s minorities that has allowed Syria to control much of Lebanon."Syria has been a patron of Hezbollah," Makovksy said, "but there has always been an ambivalence because it doesn’t share its Islamist orientation."That orientation -- militant Islamic extremism -- is shared by Hezbollah, Iran and Hamas, the largely Sunni Muslim terrorist group in Gaza that with Iran’s backing has obstructed peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.Israel's defense establishment long has perceived Syria as the weak link among those groups and has advocated outreach to the Assad regime as a way of crippling Iran's influence in the region, Makovsky said."Unlike the Palestinian issue, where there is a sense that there is a will but not necessarily a capacity, they feel in Syria there is a central authority" to ensure the success of a peace deal, Makovsky said.Moreover, Hezbollah’s growing strength in Lebanon, and Hamas’ persistent rocket attacks from Gaza on southern Israel, has made neutralizing Syrian support for those groups all the more urgent for Israel.But the Bush administration’s reticence to embrace Syria-Israel peace talks has impeded rapprochement -- until this week, that is. The Olmert administration reportedly sought and received the green light from the Bush administration for renewing peace talks with Syria.U.S. support for the process is key. Aside from the return of the Golan Heights from Israel, Syria would seek U.S. support and the opening of Western doors as a tradeoff for foregoing its alliances with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas.A State Department official, speaking to JTA on condition of anonymity, said any Israel-Syria peace deal would require Syrian concessions in areas of concern to the United States, including tighter controls at Syria's border with Iraq and human rights reforms within Syria."It is our hope that discussions between Israel and Syria will cover all the relevant issues, including the Syrian government's support for terrorist groups, facilitation of the passage of foreign fighters into Iraq and intervention in Lebanon -- as well as repression inside Syria," the official said.David Kimche, a former director-general of Israel's Foreign Ministry, said negotiations will take a while, likely stretching beyond Bush’s presidency."These negotiations are not going to end in a week or a month; it's the beginning of long negotiations," Kimche said. "The aim is to bring the Americans in. This could be the beginning of movement, not just between Israel and Syria, but between Syria and the United States."Kimche discounted suggestions by some Israeli politicians that Wednesday’s announcement was timed to distract the Israeli public from the investigation into Olmert’s financial dealings.Rather, he said, Israeli and Syrian negotiators reached the point in the process where they were able to make the formal announcement.For the Israelis, that point was Olmert agreeing to a full Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights, said Professor Eyal Zisser, a Syria expert at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle East and African Studies at Tel Aviv University.“What has changed is the Israeli position,” he said. “Olmert came to the conclusion, probably some time ago, that is in his interest and in Israel’s interest to make peace with Syria, and he is willing to give something that previous prime ministers were not. According to the Syrians, he has committed himself to a full withdrawal from the Golan Heights.”That point for Syria, Makovsky said, was a readiness to consider ending its role as a conduit for arms from Iran to Hezbollah."You cannot have a peace deal with the Israelis and still be a conduit for weapons," Makovsky said.Further down the line, involvement from the United States and others will be necessary, he added."If this is going to work, you need a lot of players to help Syria,” he said. “It's not just a local agreement.”

Link to post
Share on other sites
If Clinton or Obama were elected the last eight years would seem like child play. Oh Wait....The Democrats are in control of Congress, Never Mind.
Stop it with the hate speak man!This current Congress has the highest approval rating EVER!, and they have achieved EVERYTHING they have said they would when they were campaigning!oh wait.....no they don't, and no they didn't.my bad. :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
Israel and Syria opening up peace talks - wow, two countries talking? What, no right wing comments about those "appeasers" in Israel?
I cannot think of one thing I would hope more for the world than for Israel to know peace.That and me win the Main Event and go on Leno the same night as Rush Limbaugh.those two things only
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 6 months later...
Let's see if Obama is elected whether he stays true to that promise to retain corruption busting U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.The Daley crowd in Chicago want him gone. This will be the first test in my books just how corruptible Obama is.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_FitzgeraldFitzgerald is a guy who I believe is really interested in fighting corruption in government.
I'd vote for this guy if he ran for politics because he is really trying to bring change to Politics and I truly believe in his brand of change. This guy is taking on anyone and everyone and because of that he might end up dead soon.
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no doubt that Patrick Fitzgerald should be the US attorney General. But that might have been a bit too much change for Obama's liking.But Fitzgerald still has a lot of work to do in Illinois. There is no way Obama could fire this guy now even if he wanted to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...