Steamed Rice 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is worse.http://youtube.com/watch?v=de1jgLOCCuE LOL, that's not worse. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 Worst play was calling a raise with 53.Unless they were sooted obv. Link to post Share on other sites
ice4804 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 he was still dealt into the hand so he still got the table share. the only thing he lost by folding was the possibility of winning the hand, which obv. would have paid him way more. but the old 24o ended up not being a winning hand anyway, so really he lost absolutely nothing by folding.am i wrong here?Results-oriented thinking imo. Link to post Share on other sites
SilentButDeadly3 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is worse.http://youtube.com/watch?v=U4du3EAZoT4 Link to post Share on other sites
drcossack 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is worse.http://youtube.com/watch?v=U4du3EAZoT4 lol, I remember seeing this and thinking wtf? Link to post Share on other sites
Bizzle 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is worse.http://youtube.com/watch?v=de1jgLOCCuE That was the one I thought of when I first saw this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
RDog 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 That was the one I thought of when I first saw this thread.lolz Link to post Share on other sites
gtycoon 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 yes and they would have won $100,000.That would be a sick feeling that would take a long while to get rid of.As for Hachem...Of all the hands to put his opponent on, how did he come to think it was 8 5? You would think after the raise and re-raise and hachem holding a straight he would be forced to call there. Link to post Share on other sites
Dratj 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 When you get five bet (I think, or maybe just four bet), you might figure 2nd nuts is not good too. No need to go broke here I think. Link to post Share on other sites
Vick12 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is worse.http://youtube.com/watch?v=U4du3EAZoT4 looool....this is worse than good ole Tommy! Link to post Share on other sites
NoSup4U 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is worse.http://youtube.com/watch?v=U4du3EAZoT4 +1 Link to post Share on other sites
cubsfan44 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is better Link to post Share on other sites
psujohn 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 There's also the Matusow fold on PAD. Though I think the Woods fold is worse. Link to post Share on other sites
Jordan 1 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 folding 53 there is criminal imo! Link to post Share on other sites
Vick12 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 This is better I don't think I ever wanna sit at a table w/ Chan now. Link to post Share on other sites
DCJ001 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 Morgan thought he had the best hand. Hachem read Morgan for having the best hand. So he was right in a way.Like when Doyle folded his flush to Jamie Gold's lower flush on HSP. He read Gold for having a monster, but his read was really that Gold thought he had a monster.Hachem's laydown was pretty bad, though. If he had thought the hand through, and if he had ever seen Morgan's bluffs from the USPC (even though Morgan thought he held the better hand), he should have made the call, obviously. Link to post Share on other sites
SilentButDeadly3 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 I don't think I ever wanna sit at a table w/ Chan now.now? You wanted to before? Link to post Share on other sites
showstopper24 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 I first thought it was with Tilly when she folded the full house on PAD, then I remembered she just checked it, she didn't fold it. Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 How does this change how his table will play against him for the next couple hours? I first thought it was with Tilly when she folded the full house on PAD, then I remembered she just checked it, she didn't fold it.That was the worst check in history. Link to post Share on other sites
bull62 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 If he'd have called the floop may have been different!No on stars. Yes on ftp. Link to post Share on other sites
looshle 6 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 It's terrible, honestly. He obv has a set here, Jordans not raising preflop with 85 getting 2 calls, and checking an A high flop esp when he has a gutshot.Hachem should have just called the 12k, and gotten it in on any non board pair. Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 It's terrible, honestly. He obv has a set here, Jordans not raising preflop with 85 getting 2 calls, and checking an A high flop esp when he has a gutshot.Hachem should have just called the 12k, and gotten it in on any non board pair.Sure, but this is going to effect the how people play hands against him for a couple hours, yes? Link to post Share on other sites
NickZepp 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 I think I remember a Celebrity Poker show where Dennis Rodman folded a set because the thought the other guy had 2 pair. Link to post Share on other sites
four10 lkc 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 Like when Doyle folded his flush to Jamie Gold's lower flush on HSP. He read Gold for having a monster, but his read was really that Gold thought he had a monster. that was a pretty good laydown from doyle, because yes, jamie thought he was out front by a mile and everything gold did made doyle think he was behind. and even if doyle was ahead, there was still another card to come, and there was potential to lose a lot more money if he called and was wrong. Link to post Share on other sites
four10 lkc 0 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 now? You wanted to before?QFT, why would you want to throw money away? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now