dabetka 0 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 He's playin Ivey in Deathmatch right now...looks like he's down about 200 k to Ivey. Link to post Share on other sites
king1305 0 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Ivey is running him over, imo. Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 19, 2008 Author Share Posted February 19, 2008 LOL, while I was posting topic, he bought in another 100k and must have lost it to Ivey in a matter of 3-4 hands.Man, guess a hundo is nothing to these guys.Just bought in another 100k, so as of right now, he is down 300k with Ivey sittin with 400k now. (Guessing Ivey might take this 100k as well) Link to post Share on other sites
terradawg 0 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 funny, i am sitting here sifting through links on google trying to figure out who this seda1 guy it that ivey is pwning... Link to post Share on other sites
navybuttons 15 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 my theory is barry greenstein.can bob speak as to whether bg playing at ft would be a problem? Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 19, 2008 Author Share Posted February 19, 2008 Some of the donks on the rail (other than asking for 5 bucks) are saying it might be Laak or Esfandiari, not sure if it very reliable info. though. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 my theory is barry greenstein.can bob speak as to whether bg playing at ft would be a problem?The major problem would be bg having that kind of money to lose online not the playing on FT part. Link to post Share on other sites
Vtlaxer09 4 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Some of the donks on the rail (other than asking for 5 bucks) are saying it might be Laak or Esfandiari, not sure if it very reliable info. though.lol... probably dont have the rolls to play that heavy. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Some of the donks on the rail (other than asking for 5 bucks) are saying it might be Laak or Esfandiari, not sure if it very reliable info. though.Those are the 2 of the nittiest players on the Planet and the least likely to play Ivey heads up for those stakes. Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Author Share Posted February 20, 2008 my theory is barry greenstein.can bob speak as to whether bg playing at ft would be a problem?What makes you think its Barry? That would be cool if true. Lookin on google, it seems as though they've played before in high stakes games online.Looks like Seda doubled up now somehow, so only down 150k, good day at work. Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Author Share Posted February 20, 2008 Those are the 2 of the nittiest players on the Planet and the least likely to play Ivey heads up for those stakes.Any idea's who it might be then Bob?Also, so it wouldn't be a problem for Barry to play on F Tilt? Why would that be? Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Any idea's who it might be then Bob?Also, so it wouldn't be a problem for Barry to play on F Tilt? Why would that be?I have no clue who it is and I have no knowledge about wht Barry's contract states about playing anywhere other than Poker Stars.It would be a total guess on my part but more than likely it's an internet hotshot or Antonius on that account as opposed to a live player with a public name. Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Author Share Posted February 20, 2008 I have no clue who it is and I have no knowledge about wht Barry's contract states about playing anywhere other than Poker Stars.It would be a total guess on my part but more than likely it's an internet hotshot or Antonius on that account as opposed to a live player with a public name. Antonious sounds like a winner to me, Seda is comin back now and has 350 k to Ivey's 150k. Huge swing. Link to post Share on other sites
HighwayStar 8 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Full Tilt Poker Game #5322680218: Table Ivey Deathmatch - $500/$1000 - No Limit Hold'em - 19:55:26 ET - 2008/02/19Seat 1: Phil Ivey ($313,922.50)Seat 2: seda1 ($192,475.75)seda1 posts the small blind of $500Phil Ivey posts the big blind of $1,000The button is in seat #2*** HOLE CARDS ***seda1 raises to $3,000Phil Ivey raises to $9,000seda1 calls $6,000*** FLOP *** [6s 8d Jd]Phil Ivey bets $14,000seda1 calls $14,000*** TURN *** [6s 8d Jd] [3c]Phil Ivey bets $39,000seda1 raises to $163,000Phil Ivey raises to $287,000seda1 calls $6,475.75, and is all inPhil Ivey shows [Ah As]seda1 shows [7h Jh]Uncalled bet of $117,524.25 returned to Phil Ivey*** RIVER *** [6s 8d Jd 3c] [9c]Phil Ivey shows a pair of Acesseda1 shows a pair of JacksPhil Ivey wins the pot ($384,951) with a pair of Acesseda1 is sitting out*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $384,951.50 | Rake $0.50Board: [6s 8d Jd 3c 9c]Seat 1: Phil Ivey (big blind) showed [Ah As] and won ($384,951) with a pair of AcesSeat 2: seda1 (small blind) showed [7h Jh] and lost with a pair of JacksMBN Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Author Share Posted February 20, 2008 Wow, Ivey had chip lead 300k to Seda's 200k (about) Seda hit top pair with J, 7 with a str8 draw i believe and pushed. Ivey called with Aces and won a $400,000 pot. Man, Seda is now down 400k and rebought a hundo again. Must be Patrik, I am not sure who in their right mind would keep playin after that. F'n crazy sh.it Link to post Share on other sites
jjdylan 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 im sure seda isnt anyone we've heard of....he doesnt seem to be that good, and ivey really looks foreward to playing him Link to post Share on other sites
HighwayStar 8 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 http://www.highstakesreport.com/reports/se...omes-out-alive/They have history Link to post Share on other sites
jjdylan 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 they've played a lot....ivey is the only one seda plays. Link to post Share on other sites
Ko8e34 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Wow.Full Tilt Poker Game #5322852857: Table Ivey Deathmatch - $500/$1000 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:09:14 ET - 2008/02/19Seat 1: Phil Ivey ($463,892.25)Seat 2: seda1 ($142,495)Phil Ivey posts the small blind of $500seda1 posts the big blind of $1,000The button is in seat #1*** HOLE CARDS ***Phil Ivey raises to $3,000seda1 raises to $9,000Phil Ivey calls $6,000*** FLOP *** [Kc 6d 2h]seda1 checksPhil Ivey checks*** TURN *** [Kc 6d 2h] [7d]seda1 bets $18,000Phil Ivey raises to $66,000seda1 raises to $133,495, and is all inPhil Ivey calls $67,495seda1 shows [Ad Ks]Phil Ivey shows [6s 7h]*** RIVER *** [Kc 6d 2h 7d] [8d]seda1 shows a pair of KingsPhil Ivey shows two pair, Sevens and SixesPhil Ivey wins the pot ($284,989.50) with two pair, Sevens and Sixesseda1 is sitting out*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $284,990 | Rake $0.50Board: [Kc 6d 2h 7d 8d]Seat 1: Phil Ivey (small blind) showed [6s 7h] and won ($284,989.50) with two pair, Sevens and SixesSeat 2: seda1 (big blind) showed [Ad Ks] and lost with a pair of Kings Link to post Share on other sites
conor_mw 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 i will find out tomorrow and post it. cause now im interested to his name and cant stop thinking about it. Link to post Share on other sites
cardcore 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Wow.Full Tilt Poker Game #5322852857: Table Ivey Deathmatch - $500/$1000 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:09:14 ET - 2008/02/19Seat 1: Phil Ivey ($463,892.25)Seat 2: seda1 ($142,495)Phil Ivey posts the small blind of $500seda1 posts the big blind of $1,000The button is in seat #1*** HOLE CARDS ***Phil Ivey raises to $3,000seda1 raises to $9,000Phil Ivey calls $6,000*** FLOP *** [Kc 6d 2h]seda1 checksPhil Ivey checks*** TURN *** [Kc 6d 2h] [7d]seda1 bets $18,000Phil Ivey raises to $66,000seda1 raises to $133,495, and is all inPhil Ivey calls $67,495seda1 shows [Ad Ks]Phil Ivey shows [6s 7h]*** RIVER *** [Kc 6d 2h 7d] [8d]seda1 shows a pair of KingsPhil Ivey shows two pair, Sevens and SixesPhil Ivey wins the pot ($284,989.50) with two pair, Sevens and Sixesseda1 is sitting out*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $284,990 | Rake $0.50Board: [Kc 6d 2h 7d 8d]Seat 1: Phil Ivey (small blind) showed [6s 7h] and won ($284,989.50) with two pair, Sevens and SixesSeat 2: seda1 (big blind) showed [Ad Ks] and lost with a pair of KingsSeda telegraphed his hand so badly here, I was watching it and as soon as he instachceked the flop, I knew Ivey was a) getting a free card and B) going to stack Seda if he hit. As soon as Ivey raised I said "Just caught up with 67 or 77, so gross" Link to post Share on other sites
dabetka 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Author Share Posted February 20, 2008 Jeez,How deep is this guy?He went busto for 500 k and Ivey left, now Ivey is back with over 650k!This is almost sick. This Seda guy has to be absolutely loaded to lose over 600k in this session. I am extremely suprised that noone knows who he is. Link to post Share on other sites
MrJohn 0 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Jeez,How deep is this guy?He went busto for 500 k and Ivey left, now Ivey is back with over 650k!This is almost sick. This Seda guy has to be absolutely loaded to lose over 600k in this session. I am extremely suprised that noone knows who he is.Yeah wonder who he is. Down 600k in a session would make me cry. Link to post Share on other sites
navybuttons 15 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 my theory that it's barry greenstein is based on a couple of things:1) one time durrr was sitting and ivey asked him to leave knowing that seda was going to sit down.2) the HSNL guys at 2+2 are not impressed with seda's game, meaning that he probably is more likely a live player (or that he is not a huge internet winner like antonious, townsend, etc.)3) he only plays ivey at ft which would lead me to believe that they have some sort of history or whatever.4) he plays much more passive than the typical internet HU specialists. from what i've seen of barry's play on HSP, he is not a ram-and-jam player.5) barry would probably have enough money, or get a big enough loan from ivey to play. the list of players who would be able to do this is VERY small.of course, i'm just making wild speculation, but it makes the most sense to me. hense, it is my thoery. Link to post Share on other sites
wsox8 10 Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Full Tilt Poker Game #5323420945: Table Ivey Deathmatch - $500/$1000 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:54:12 ET - 2008/02/19 (partial)seda1 calls $2,000*** FLOP *** [7d 8d 8h]seda1 checksPhil Ivey bets $4,000seda1 calls $4,000*** TURN *** [7d 8d 8h] [5h]seda1 checksPhil Ivey bets $12,000seda1 raises to $50,000Phil Ivey has 15 seconds left to actPhil Ivey raises to $164,000seda1 has 15 seconds left to actseda1 has requested TIMEseda1 raises to $186,487.50, and is all inPhil Ivey calls $22,487.50seda1 shows [8c Qc]Phil Ivey shows [8s Qs]*** RIVER *** [7d 8d 8h 5h] [Js]seda1 shows three of a kind, EightsPhil Ivey shows three of a kind, Eightsseda1 ties for the pot ($193,487.25) with three of a kind, EightsPhil Ivey ties for the pot ($193,487.25) with three of a kind, Eights*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $386,975 | Rake $0.50Board: [7d 8d 8h 5h Js]Seat 1: Phil Ivey (small blind) showed [8s Qs] and won ($193,487.25) with three of a kind, EightsSeat 2: seda1 (big blind) showed [8c Qc] and won ($193,487.25) with three of a kind, Eights Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now