loxo 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 PokerStars Game #14948453511: Tournament #75574465, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2008/01/30 - 23:39:25 (ET)Table '75574465 121' 6-max Seat #3 is the buttonSeat 1: SC321 (995 in chips) Seat 2: Jen2311 (825 in chips) Seat 3: down4surfing (1940 in chips) Seat 4: NLights5 (1385 in chips) Seat 5: THE BORT (365 in chips) Seat 6: loxo (7910 in chips) NLights5: posts small blind 15THE BORT: posts big blind 30*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to loxo [9c 9d]loxo: raises 90 to 120SC321: folds Jen2311: calls 120down4surfing: folds NLights5: folds THE BORT: calls 90*** FLOP *** [Ks Jh 8c]THE BORT: checks loxo: checks Jen2311: bets 210THE BORT: calls 210loxo: folds *** TURN *** [Ks Jh 8c] [As]THE BORT: bets 30Jen2311: calls 30*** RIVER *** [Ks Jh 8c As] [4c]THE BORT: bets 5 and is all-inJen2311: folds THE BORT collected 855 from potloxo said, "WTF?"*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 855 | Rake 0 Board [Ks Jh 8c As 4c]Seat 1: SC321 folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 2: Jen2311 folded on the RiverSeat 3: down4surfing (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 4: NLights5 (small blind) folded before FlopSeat 5: THE BORT (big blind) collected (855)Seat 6: loxo folded on the Flop Link to post Share on other sites
Knollie919 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 chip dump or complete idiot Link to post Share on other sites
ah2388 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 support@pokerstars.com Link to post Share on other sites
vbnautilus 48 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 the post-oak bluff works? Link to post Share on other sites
Waffles2003 1 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 they wont do anything, they can never prove that someone is colluding. I have sent them many cases and never won any... Link to post Share on other sites
king1305 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 loldonkaments. Link to post Share on other sites
PillyPill 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Well...obviously he...I mean he...could he....It was the...hmmmm.... Link to post Share on other sites
southsidepoker 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 they wont do anything, they can never prove that someone is colluding. I have sent them many cases and never won any...It is some shadiness though. Link to post Share on other sites
DunkinDonuts 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 If you Sharkscope her, you might get your answer. Link to post Share on other sites
A_Bullets_A 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 they wont do anything, they can never prove that someone is colluding. I have sent them many cases and never won any...I've sent hand histories to PokerStars three times when I thought there was collusion at my table and each time they've added money to my account and sent an e-mail saying they've banned the other players. Link to post Share on other sites
James D 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 obviously knew he was beat.. saved himself 5 chips. I say great laydown. Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 they wont do anything, they can never prove that someone is colluding. I have sent them many cases and never won any...Couldn't be further from the truth. I've sent hand histories to PokerStars three times when I thought there was collusion at my table and each time they've added money to my account and sent an e-mail saying they've banned the other players.PS collusion investigation is the best in the industry. Link to post Share on other sites
loxo 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Author Share Posted January 31, 2008 Have e-mailed them, we'll see what happens. Link to post Share on other sites
Waffles2003 1 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Couldn't be further from the truth. PS collusion investigation is the best in the industry.your uncle works for them? Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 obviously knew he was beat.. saved himself 5 chips. I say great laydown.When you're beat, you're beat...............I'm sure PS will look into it. Let us know what they say. Did either of those two end up in the money ? Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 interestig, I posted a simlar but WORSE example and got flamedoh wellI say he semi bulffed and knew he was beat and maybe embarrassed,or cheating Link to post Share on other sites
ShaneO19 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 If you Sharkscope her, you might get your answer.DING DING DING. Here is the answer but I guess it just gets ignored. You asked if anyone could explain it and there it is.It really isn't that big of a deal anyway. If someone has a missed draw then they may sometimes fold on the river to a super small bet. I personally would have called anyway for that amount even if I was playing the board hoping that maybe the other person was too. If this was a MTT then it would be pretty hard to plan on being at the same table. You also can't rule out a missclick. Don't just assume that there is collusion when you see a strange play. Link to post Share on other sites
FileError404 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Simple, he would only bluff 1 in 169 times... All about the meta game Link to post Share on other sites
mase_gotsem 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 HE HAD 910 DIDNT GET THERE AND FOLDED TO PREVENT GIVING INFO WHILE MAKIG YOU ALL THINK HES A DONK ..OR COLLUSION Link to post Share on other sites
Doug 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 HE HAD 910 DIDNT GET THERE AND FOLDED TO PREVENT GIVING INFO WHILE MAKIG YOU ALL THINK HES A DONK ..OR COLLUSIONexactly what i thought. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Le Gh3y? Link to post Share on other sites
Poker Addict 0 Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 Stars has helped me a lot on the one time I ran into obvious (or so I thought) collusion. They said exactly the same thing - looking at their hand history it looks like there was some collusion, blah blah blah and they gave me some cash back then said that their accounts had been closed.Who knows if this is true but it gives you a warm fuzzy Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now