No Cool Titles. 1/2nl At Venetian

[Willing 2 Die 0]

but just consider what being wrong is going to cost you vs what happens when all of your reads are exactly spot on and you're still in a super marginal situation IF all of the variables are in your favor.

thats what i don't like about the call on the turn. I think you got very lucky in this spot. You could have easily lost $200 with an 8 high flush on a four flush board.

[Willing 2 Die 0]

So what was his reaction when you called him? I'm gonna take a guess and say he wasn't happy.

[dscoot 0]

good job, man. From your description I was thinking the veg las had a made hand on the flop, most likely the straight. So it makes sense to play it how u did. My only fault in these situations is probably folding to this river bet a couple of times when i shouldnt. I partially follow my reads like this but seem to shut down be4 the end too often. Guess its just practice and experience, huh? Cuz it seems to me your #1 accomplishment in this hand is your river call. And oh if u can fit in a river min-raise here, knowing that A) he had the straight, B) musta gave him a lower flush too , u would be genious

[TeeSludge 0]

If we are villain what is our optimal river line? Also, if villain in this hand checked this river what were you planning on doing?

[Royal_Tour 0]

Also, if villain in this hand checked this river what were you planning on doing?

Good question.. I actually do bet it. Mostly because I'm confident that i'm ahead, and I really dont like showing my hands at showdown

[Royal_Tour 0]

bump cuz acid knight said my logic here was sound.

[Luke00016 0]

bump cuz acid knight said my logic here was sound.

Since people are bumping stuff left and right at the moment, here's a question.Do you still agree with your play here?I'm inclined to follow Acid's logic about needing multiple reads to be spot on giving you a marginal win vs. being wrong anywhere and taking a big loss.Also, since you put him on basically one hand (and the 7h on the river confirming he wasn't playing a combo draw), do you consider min-raising this river?

[Royal_Tour 0]

Since people are bumping stuff left and right at the moment, here's a question.Do you still agree with your play here?I'm inclined to follow Acid's logic about needing multiple reads to be spot on giving you a marginal win vs. being wrong anywhere and taking a big loss.Also, since you put him on basically one hand (and the 7h on the river confirming he wasn't playing a combo draw), do you consider min-raising this river?

I agree 100% with what acid said.My problem is "daniel negreanu-ism" I'm vocal about my predictions and make them as narrow as possible.When it works, i'm a genius. But when i'm wrong, I get burned. So yea, this one was spot on, would i do it again? lol I dont know.The more i look at this hand, the more i think. its a toss up that i have to think. he could have a set/2 pair/straight.. or he could have a straight combo small flushi based my odds that there were more comibinations of sets 2 pair and straights than 1 particular combo of straight/and flush