king_tanner 84 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Table #36 Update: Folding The Nuts"With a board of Ad Ks Jh 10h Qs, Nick Schulman moves all in for almost 25,000 into the tiny pot and Men "The Master" Nguyen quickly calls all in behind him. Seat 3 folds and Tom Dobrilovic moves all in behind. Seat 6 announces that he is all in and now it is up to Beth Shak to make her decision. After a few moments, she decides to muck her cards.Of course, the players turn over their cards and begin to laugh. Schulman says, "Every little chip helps," as he collects his piece of the pot. Nguyen can't stop laughing and Seat 3 still has no idea what is going on. Dobrilovic, who held pocket fours, stays silent and Seat 6 disappointingly shows his counterfeited Q-7 offsuit."Are you kidding me? Beginners don't even do that s_hit. Link to post Share on other sites
HubDub04 0 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Beth Shak is the epitome of a dumb broad playing with her husbands money. Link to post Share on other sites
Cappy37 0 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Too bad she didn't have aces, she would have danced around and then come back to the table and re-raised... Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago99 0 Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 obv didn't want to show her hand and give info away Link to post Share on other sites
king_tanner 84 Posted November 9, 2007 Author Share Posted November 9, 2007 obv didn't want to show her hand and give info awayYou mean that's what Dan told her to say right? lol Link to post Share on other sites
Buckeye Hughes 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 And she's a "Full Tilt Pro"? Link to post Share on other sites
Veener Schnitz 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 Beth Shak is the epitome of a dumb broad playing with her husbands money.qft Link to post Share on other sites
dapokerbum 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 From: http://www.pokerpages.com/players/profiles...3/beth-shak.htmAmbition: To be the best possible poker player that I can. To win a major tournamentFalling way short of that!!! Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 I'd fold, don't want to be risking all your chips there in case it isn't a chopped pot. You can't lose what you don't put in the middle. Link to post Share on other sites
loxo 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 I'd fold, don't want to be risking all your chips there in case it isn't a chopped pot. You can't lose what you don't put in the middle.You know, someone's going to take you seriously. Link to post Share on other sites
scottyno 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 she was scared of someone having the all powerful rainbow straight flush with 5 cards of all 5 different suits that beats all other hands Link to post Share on other sites
chgocubs99 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 You know, someone's going to take you seriously.Not anymore. Dammit. Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 What if someone had 89. Then they would have a 7 card straight. Surely a 7 card straight beats a 5 card straight? Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 What if someone had 89. Then they would have a 7 card straight. Surely a 7 card straight beats a 5 card straight? Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 uhm obv she was playing 2 card omaha where both cards must be played. Link to post Share on other sites
Cappy37 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 I'm sure Dan will take it out on her tonight to make things right.Hair-pulling FTW Link to post Share on other sites
conor_mw 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 thats really really bad poker. how on earth do these players get the money to go into these events and than not notice something as obvious as a board like that. ****ing community nuts Link to post Share on other sites
Cappy37 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 thats really really bad poker. how on earth do these players get the money to go into these events and than not notice something as obvious as a board like that. ****ing community nutsThat's not even the half of it. The real tragedy is the government and banks have taken multiple steps to make it as hard on these idiots as possible to deposit online. *cries* Link to post Share on other sites
TravisG 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 uhmm.. how was the "fold when you dont have to" strategy called from one of the threads in general poker strategy? Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 obv didn't want to show her hand and give info awayanyone think there is reasoning here??it looks like it was a limped pot.lets say its still early, blinds are 50/100 and she limped AA or something in LP after a few other limpers.then she flops top set and tried to slow play it.now she would rather give up her 100 then look silly to the table, but she didnt realise that she would look stupid to the viewers? Link to post Share on other sites
sandwedge 30 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 What if someone had 89. Then they would have a 7 card straight. Surely a 7 card straight beats a 5 card straight?Or a 23, for the wraparound seven card straight. Oh, wait, a 9 is higher than a 3. Nevermind. Link to post Share on other sites
mkaplan108 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 anyone think there is reasoning here??it looks like it was a limped pot.lets say its still early, blinds are 50/100 and she limped AA or something in LP after a few other limpers.then she flops top set and tried to slow play it.now she would rather give up her 100 then look silly to the table, but she didnt realise that she would look stupid to the viewers?She couldn't have AA, she wasn't dancing around the table.I think you are giving her to much credit to think about folding to give an image, she is just that stupid. Link to post Share on other sites
Cappy37 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 anyone think there is reasoning here??it looks like it was a limped pot.lets say its still early, blinds are 50/100 and she limped AA or something in LP after a few other limpers.then she flops top set and tried to slow play it.now she would rather give up her 100 then look silly to the table, but she didnt realise that she would look stupid to the viewers? Too bad she didn't have aces, she would have danced around and then come back to the table and re-raised...She has a pretty strong tell for aces...edit: lol jinx! Link to post Share on other sites
TravisG 0 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 sounds like the wpt is a donkament 100th post! Link to post Share on other sites
blakheart 3 Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 I love how Schulman know that someone will laydown a hand there to his shove. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now