pocket3s 0 Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 lol quite the brag about beating mississippi state, west virginia hung 28 on them in the 1st quarter. They are a decent team, but beating them handily as a good football team is no accomplishment. LSU has played too many close games this year and could have 3-5 losses. I think Ohio State will win, but I dont know how you can say its going to be a blow out.Close games are what happen when you play in a conference with talent. I just referenced Miss St. bc they are one of 2 teams we played when we were completely healthy like this game. I understand you're still bitter bc you think your team should be in this game, but you couldn't pull out the victory bc you lost your Louisiana player. Link to post Share on other sites
Jadaki 0 Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Close games are what happen when you play in a conference with talent. I just referenced Miss St. bc they are one of 2 teams we played when we were completely healthy like this game. I understand you're still bitter bc you think your team should be in this game, but you couldn't pull out the victory bc you lost your Louisiana player.There is as much talent in the Big-10 as there is in the SEC. That's just what the media has spoon fed everyone about college football this year, it's old news. It's been well documented in this thread and the SEC Delivers thread about the SEC record vs the Big-10.If the SEC was half as good as everyone claims then Michigan would have had no chance against Florida and TN would have destroyed Wisconsin before halftime, oops neither of those things happened. I hate OSU with a passion but I'm not going to deny they have a lot of talented players who could play for any program in the country. If you really think that OSU has no shot to beat LSU after the craziest season of CFB ever then I don't know what to tell you. The fact a two loss team is even in the title game should tell you anything can happen this year.In fact this shouldn't be called the title game, at this point it's a game between the teams who fucked up the least this year. Link to post Share on other sites
Ganseynogle 0 Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Close games are what happen when you play in a conference with talent. I just referenced Miss St. bc they are one of 2 teams we played when we were completely healthy like this game. I understand you're still bitter bc you think your team should be in this game, but you couldn't pull out the victory bc you lost your Louisiana player.Im far from bitter... Why would I think my team should be in the NC. They lost to pitt? they shouldnt have been in there after that game obv. I just think you are overhyping lsu and thinking that osu has no chance is rediculous. Im sure you though Oklahoma was going to blow out WVU, but that didnt happen. Link to post Share on other sites
DrawingDeadInDM 0 Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Ohio State, 17-3. Book it. Bring it home for the Big Ten, boys. (This obv means LSU's gonna win by 3 TDs.) Link to post Share on other sites
fitzinabox 0 Posted January 7, 2008 Author Share Posted January 7, 2008 27-24 osu ftw Link to post Share on other sites
dms26 3 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Stinky Tree U needs to go out and play somebody before they can say anything. I know I know, you played Michigan and Michigan beat Florida, that means that...oh wait, it still doesn't make up for the fact that you haven't played anybody. This game won't be close. LSU had 2 games this year where everybody was healthy, go ask Mississippi State and Virginia Tech how those turned out. Now everybody is ready, I don't think Ohio St. breaks the 200 yard mark let alone scores in double digits. Lsu 38-OSU6. weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Link to post Share on other sites
eYank 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 lollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollollol Link to post Share on other sites
showstopper24 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 I'm from Cleveland...so I am not surprised. Link to post Share on other sites
rocketpoker828 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Meh, good season for the Buckeyes, but this shit of getting there and not getting it done has to stop. Hopefully we'll pick up Pryor and tell Boeckman to GTFO. Link to post Share on other sites
Jadaki 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Meh, good season for the Buckeyes, but this shit of getting there and not getting it done has to stop. Hopefully we'll pick up Pryor and tell Boeckman to GTFO.He wore a Michigan hoodie to the HS all star game the other day. Link to post Share on other sites
Freddec 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Meh, good season for the Buckeyes, but this shit of getting there and not getting it done has to stop. Hopefully we'll pick up Pryor and tell Boeckman to GTFO. He wore a Michigan hoodie to the HS all star game the other day.bink Link to post Share on other sites
pocket3s 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 MUHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAH. Hey Solderz, I'll have your avatar ready for tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites
solderz 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 MUHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAH. Hey Solderz, I'll have your avatar ready for tomorrow.I'll eat my crow. Done enough of it in my life. ;-(Go Bucks in 2008 - 2009!!! Link to post Share on other sites
dms26 3 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 sigh, great time to be a Buccaneer & Buckeye fan. Link to post Share on other sites
pocket3s 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 I'll eat my crow. Done enough of it in my life. ;-(Go Bucks in 2008 - 2009!!!Here you go. Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,722 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Meh, good season for the Buckeyes, but this shit of getting there and not getting it done has to stop. Hopefully we'll pick up Pryor and tell Boeckman to GTFO.I'd rather see my team get there and lose, then not get there at all. Link to post Share on other sites
solderz 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Paying homage to the porcelain god. Link to post Share on other sites
eYank 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Seriously read this:http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/sto...mp;sportCat=ncfGreat article by Pat Forde Link to post Share on other sites
Jadaki 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Seriously read this:http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/sto...mp;sportCat=ncfGreat article by Pat FordeGreat...That's the worst reporting I've ever seen.I thought it was cute how he only brought up Florida in regards to last years NT game, not how they got ran over by Michigan this year in their own backyard because that would counter his point. Since 1990, Penn State is 5-2 versus the SEC and Michigan is 7-3 against them, thats a lot of upsets and those were just the first two Big-10 teams I looked at. Just because OSU can't ever beat them at anything doesn't mean no one else in the conference is capable of it. Sad part is the SEC almost always has homefield advantage in these "neutral site" games, but then again that might take away some of his nifty O-H-N-O comments if he reported facts. Let me know when Florida wants to leave the state for a OOC game. Next year OSU plays USC, the Big-10 should be even stronger with teams like Illinois on the rise and not really losing any key players. If OSU finishes next year undefeated, there is no reason they wouldn't be worthy of being in the NT game. Link to post Share on other sites
dms26 3 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Seriously read this:http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/sto...mp;sportCat=ncfGreat article by Pat Fordelol that's not biased at all Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Great...That's the worst reporting I've ever seen.I thought it was cute how he only brought up Florida in regards to last years NT game, not how they got ran over by Michigan this year in their own backyard because that would counter his point. Since 1990, Penn State is 5-2 versus the SEC and Michigan is 7-3 against them, thats a lot of upsets and those were just the first two Big-10 teams I looked at. Just because OSU can't ever beat them at anything doesn't mean no one else in the conference is capable of it. Sad part is the SEC almost always has homefield advantage in these "neutral site" games, but then again that might take away some of his nifty O-H-N-O comments if he reported facts. Let me know when Florida wants to leave the state for a OOC game. Next year OSU plays USC, the Big-10 should be even stronger with teams like Illinois on the rise and not really losing any key players. If OSU finishes next year undefeated, there is no reason they wouldn't be worthy of being in the NT game.I hate Ohio State but that article is awful. Completely ignores 2002 where OSU beat a team much better than either FLA last year or LSU this year. Makes lots of unfair assumptions.A REAL article would focus on the Big Ten's lack of a championship game.....#1 reason Ohio State has an easier path than most to the BCS title game. Link to post Share on other sites
dms26 3 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 A REAL article would focus on the Big Ten's lack of a championship game.....#1 reason Ohio State has an easier path than most to the BCS title game.Agreed, same for the Pac10 Link to post Share on other sites
fitzinabox 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Author Share Posted January 8, 2008 3 words, Life Fuccking Tilt! Link to post Share on other sites
eYank 0 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Wait Michigan blew out Florida?Last time i checked, it was 6 points, thats not exactly a blow out41-14 is a blowout Link to post Share on other sites
dms26 3 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Wait Michigan blew out Florida?Last time i checked, it was 6 points, thats not exactly a blow out41-14 is a blowoutHe said ran over, not blew out, RIF. 500+ yards of offensive is kinda running over someone. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now