Jump to content

New Bodog

RDog

By RDog,
in General Poker Forum

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

wsox8

wsox8 10

Posted
Posted
Be nice if they got a new interface but sounds like nothing good coming out of this.
agreed and a way to transfer $ from player to player.
Link to post
Share on other sites
RDog

RDog 0

Posted
  • Author
Posted
agreed and a way to transfer $ from player to player.
I think an interface that is not downright unusable is much more important.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Waffles2003

Waffles2003 1

Posted
Posted
agreed and a way to transfer $ from player to player.
its still going to be the same shizzy software with a couple of things different, i think. Just like last time they "upgraded" their software, it was the same shizz
Link to post
Share on other sites
wsox8

wsox8 10

Posted
Posted
I think an interface that is not downright unusable is much more important.
Don't start with me today, rdog :club:
its still going to be the same shizzy software with a couple of things different, i think. Just like last time they "upgraded" their software, it was the same shizz
Yeah I know, but it would be nice to get some actual updates
Link to post
Share on other sites
RDog

RDog 0

Posted
  • Author
Posted
disagree
On which part? You think their software is usable or you think peer to peer transfer is more important?UB has peer to peer, yet I don't play there and their traffic sucks even though they have the best structures bar none. Why?
Link to post
Share on other sites
silkyjonson

silkyjonson 1

Posted
Posted
6 Max 1-2 NL and the ability to play more than 3 tables would be a nice start. Oh, and adding more MTT's that don't suck balls would help, too.
I always wondered why they never had 6 max 1-2NL. The MTT's are fairly lucrative with the slow structure and the overlays plus weaksauce players. It really is a disadvantage not being able to normally play 3+ tables. Even playing 3 you can only really watch full action at one table which blows compared to stars and tilt.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Czech Razor

Czech Razor 0

Posted
Posted
I always wondered why they never had 6 max 1-2NL. The MTT's are fairly lucrative with the slow structure and the overlays plus weaksauce players. It really is a disadvantage not being able to normally play 3+ tables. Even playing 3 you can only really watch full action at one table which blows compared to stars and tilt.
Structure is ok but I was referring to making some bigger guaranteed MTT's ... not like their $100+$10 $10,000 Guaranteed which is quite lame. But, they'd have to have more traffic to do that which means improving cash games and software first. Accessible rakeback would also be nice. I know you can get it there but I tried going through one affiliate and waited 9 weeks just to be told Bodog shot them down.
Link to post
Share on other sites
silkyjonson

silkyjonson 1

Posted
Posted
Structure is ok but I was referring to making some bigger guaranteed MTT's ... not like their $100+$10 $10,000 Guaranteed which is quite lame. But, they'd have to have more traffic to do that which means improving cash games and software first. Accessible rakeback would also be nice. I know you can get it there but I tried going through one affiliate and waited 9 weeks just to be told Bodog shot them down.
The 50k, 40k, 100k are all solid tournies but ya it would be nice to have more bigger guarnatees.
Link to post
Share on other sites
finztotheleft

finztotheleft 0

Posted
Posted

Newbodog seems to be exactly the same as the old Bodog.I haven't played on that account in awhile, but figured I'd play for a bit as Pokerstars is down. I was really in a panic when I couldn't open it with my desktop icon, then couldn't bring up bodog.com on the intenent. Instantly petrified that that that the US government figured out some way to block poker sites.............PHEW ! Downloaded the newbodog.com and all is well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CobaltBlue

CobaltBlue 662

Posted
Posted
I think an interface that is not downright unusable is much more important.
I disagree about the interface being unusable. Maybe it's because I "grew up" with Bodog, but I generally prefer it. I agree that they should allow more tables than just 3, they should have player-to-player transfers, and a resize option would be good. One decent side effect of fewer tables is that it doesn't get taken over by strong multitablers...so while the game selection remains a little limited, most of the games are great. However, the fact that they store hand histories on the server is actually a nice little feature - I've become really frustrated lately with Stars/FT on not being able to go back and see hands if the connection goes down for some reason. Additionally, the layout seems more "professional" than Stars...which, while functional, seems crowded and tacky. The layout is pretty customizable and contains a lot of info.And how can you dislike the MTTs? Yeah, the fields don't compare to Stars/FT, but the consistent overlays have ridiculous value. Also, they'll get there eventually. Within the past few months, they started that nightly $100 12k.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jrobb25

Jrobb25 0

Posted
Posted
I disagree about the interface being unusable. Maybe it's because I "grew up" with Bodog, but I generally prefer it. I agree that they should allow more tables than just 3, they should have player-to-player transfers, and a resize option would be good. One decent side effect of fewer tables is that it doesn't get taken over by strong multitablers...so while the game selection remains a little limited, most of the games are great. However, the fact that they store hand histories on the server is actually a nice little feature - I've become really frustrated lately with Stars/FT on not being able to go back and see hands if the connection goes down for some reason. Additionally, the layout seems more "professional" than Stars...which, while functional, seems crowded and tacky. The layout is pretty customizable and contains a lot of info.And how can you dislike the MTTs? Yeah, the fields don't compare to Stars/FT, but the consistent overlays have ridiculous value. Also, they'll get there eventually. Within the past few months, they started that nightly $100 12k.
Im with you. I grew up on bodog so I generally like the interface. But player to player transfers would be great. And it has sports betting which is great. Also WAREAGLE COBALT! I see you on bodog all the time Im wareagle2525 on there and your always quick to throw out a WARDAMNEAGLE. Cant wait for sat night.
Link to post
Share on other sites
CobaltBlue

CobaltBlue 662

Posted
Posted
Im with you. I grew up on bodog so I generally like the interface. But player to player transfers would be great. And it has sports betting which is great. Also WAREAGLE COBALT! I see you on bodog all the time Im wareagle2525 on there and your always quick to throw out a WARDAMNEAGLE. Cant wait for sat night.
War Eagle, man. Did someone in Auburn introduce you to the site? Cause that was my experience. There seem to be quite a few of us students/fans on there. Also, I know it's kind of blasphemy, but with any luck, I'll be deep enough in a tournament to miss the game on Sat.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jdr999

Jdr999 0

Posted
Posted
War Eagle, man. Did someone in Auburn introduce you to the site? Cause that was my experience. There seem to be quite a few of us students/fans on there. Also, I know it's kind of blasphemy, but with any luck, I'll be deep enough in a tournament to miss the game on Sat.
Cobalt, are you keeping what $ you have in Bodog, or are you going to take someout? Should I be worrying about my funds on Bodog, and requesting withdraws?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...