Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay, here are my thoughts on scoring.I think 6 points per passing touchdown is a bit much. We always go with four, but make ints -1. I guess at -2, making the passing touchdowns 5 would be okay. I don't know. It just seems heavily pro-QB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 311
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I will play if I can ship via paypal. Also, is it possible to change the 3rd WR position to a RB/WR flex position?Edit: I also would strongly prefer only 10 teams.
I prefer 3 WRs, personally, because it increases the value of a WR in the draft, which is normally very low. With only two, you can really pass on those primadonnas. :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
Scoring seems fine, I'm in, altho I'd get rid of return TDs and make passing touchdowns maybe like 5 points(or make 50 yards passing per point) and receptions .8 instead of 1, but I'll do whatever scoring ppl want.
Oh, I didn't see that receptions were points. That has always been a disaster when my league has done it. I prefer no points for receptions.
Link to post
Share on other sites

KI can hold the money. We can discuss that stuff later.I am for recpetions, but we can vote. I think receptions add a lot to the league in regards to evening out the difference between RB's and WR's. While it is true that some RB's get even bigger because of this, it makes the top end WR's much closer in value to the 2nd 5 RB's or so. But on all of this I am flexible, I just think the more scoring the merrier!!! And any way you can make QB's and WR's closer in value to RB's, the more competitive the league...just my 2 cents. As for number of guys, w/ Rhinestone and Gobears both wanting in, that makes 11...and Rhinestone already said he prefers a 10 team league. (Since I am holding the money, we can arrange a way for me to get it somehow if it isn't via poker transfer.) So if we let both in we need 1 more...and then does Rhinestone want in?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh, I didn't see that receptions were points. That has always been a disaster when my league has done it. I prefer no points for receptions.
vick wants reception points.. obv ill do what the majority wants... so you guys tell me what yo uwant/ how you want it and ill make it happen.... <3 -Commish
Link to post
Share on other sites

The scoring system doesn't matter much to me as long as we just set it in stone ASAP. Everyone can adjust to whatever the scoring is. Standard Passing TD's is 4 points but if we are giving one point a reception then I think you have to give more points for Passing TD's.Where are we shipping? Vick, I would prefer shipping on FT if that is okay with you? If not, I can ship on Stars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so who do i ship the money too?also i dont mind reception points.i would like to maybe knock around the idea of limiting the number of moves. i just kind of get annoyed when a guy in the league has like 60 moves or trades. i think by limiting the amount of moves makes it move strategy drivin because you actually have to think about what you need for the future and not just think about oh hell i just need this guy for this week and such. another idea is, which i have done in other leagues, to charge for moves. meaning that each move will be like 5 bucks, i understand that could be hard with this being over the internet but its just a thought because i would either like to have moves limited or make people pay for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
so who do i ship the money too?also i dont mind reception points.i would like to maybe knock around the idea of limiting the number of moves. i just kind of get annoyed when a guy in the league has like 60 moves or trades. i think by limiting the amount of moves makes it move strategy drivin because you actually have to think about what you need for the future and not just think about oh hell i just need this guy for this week and such. another idea is, which i have done in other leagues, to charge for moves. meaning that each move will be like 5 bucks, i understand that could be hard with this being over the internet but its just a thought because i would either like to have moves limited or make people pay for them.
I love that idea!
Link to post
Share on other sites
obvI'll wager as much as you like.
You do realize GROSSman is still your QB right? Okay, let me think about the amount.I will take your action too Kurt.
Link to post
Share on other sites
being charged for moves in a yahoo league is ridiculous imo. I don't think there should be a cap either, not that it will matter much. No one is going to be making ten moves a week.
I don't think having unlimited moves without charging is fair to anyone. I'm sure there are people in the league that have actual jobs so those of us that are on the computer all day have a big advantage over everyone else if you don't do one or the other. FWIW, I have been in over 100 leagues probably and I have never been in a $$$$ league that did not do one or the other. You may not think it is a big deal now but trust me, when one person makes 10 moves a week, blocks you from picking up players (because of the Yahoo waiver wire), you won't like it. Not controlling the moves in one way or another could be a dealbreaker for me because like I said, being that drops are blocked for a few days on the waiver wire, the system could be completely manipulated by someone. If this were a $10 league I would care less but if we are putting in 200 bones each, it should be run fairly.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...