Naismith 0 Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 I'm not good with this sort of thing. Is there any way to figure out the odds of hitting a bad beat jackpot?At the local dog track, the qualifying hand is aces ful of jacks getting beat by four of a kind or better. The four of a kind has to be with a pocket pair and all cards have to play. Link to post Share on other sites
jjdylan 0 Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 not good enough to worry about.but that sounds better than a lot of places where its quad 88 or better beaten under the same restrictions Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted July 31, 2007 Author Share Posted July 31, 2007 not good enough to worry about.I'm not trying to win the bad beat jackpot, I just want a statistical answer for when people act like I'm crazy for preferring a non-jackpot table (which is currently non-existent). Link to post Share on other sites
tskillz187 0 Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 I'm not trying to win the bad beat jackpot, I just want a statistical answer for when people act like I'm crazy for preferring a non-jackpot table (which is currently non-existent).I don't know the odds. I do know that I'd always prefer playing at non-jackpot table. They rake a dollar more every hand and only have to redistribute 75% (Guess on the %) but they do it for the extra rake. Link to post Share on other sites
blakheart 3 Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 I don't know the odds. I do know that I'd always prefer playing at non-jackpot table. They rake a dollar more every hand and only have to redistribute 75% (Guess on the %) but they do it for the extra rake.In California the entire jackpot rack needs to be paid out. That being said, I would rather waste my dollar on a lottery ticket. Both are such longshots to hit it isn't even worth calcualting payouts. Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyJoe 0 Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 I don't know the odds. I do know that I'd always prefer playing at non-jackpot table. They rake a dollar more every hand and only have to redistribute 75% (Guess on the %) but they do it for the extra rake.wouldnt more donkeys be playing at the jackpot tables? possibly enough so that it would negate the extra rake? Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 Aces full of jacks or better beaten by four-of-a-kind or better. If the winning hand is four-of-a-kind, then the hole cards must be a pocket pair. In all cases, both cards of the losing hand and both cards of the winning hand must be used.I'm at work right now, but will come back (probably tomorrow night, not tonight) to edit this post and fill in the answer. Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 Eleventy Brazilion to one. Book it. Link to post Share on other sites
BrandonPL 0 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 wouldnt more donkeys be playing at the jackpot tables? possibly enough so that it would negate the extra rake?One big advantage at jackpot tables, especially low limit ones, is that the people who are there just gambling are going to play more hands that have a shot at the jackpot. Its not uncommon to have players play any and all pairs for any number of bets (in LHE at least) preflop. Of course, this will increase variance because you will have more players seeing each flop and more bad beats, but pots will also be bigger from the loose preflop action created by players hoping to flop a jackpot hand. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now