Jump to content

Full Tilt Or Pokerstars?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Pokerstars is 100 times better. Also their FPP system works out to something like 10% or 15% rakeback (since you can cash them in for Sunday million tourney tickets). Also you can get better value than just cashing them in if you play satellites, and then when you win the satellites you can just take the t$ and use it for whatever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all personal preference, can't go wrong with either. Pstars has more players and therefore more games. However I like FTPs graphics much better and I find it easier to just hop into one of their turbo SNGs. Also the bet pot button is nice and I like the sound effects better. Plus the Stars hurry up the action's on you sound is much more jarring. Oh, and I have a special avatar on ftp so I may be biased.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would, without question, put your money at stars.....i really like alot of the stuff they have. When they do have deposit bonuses they aren't too bad and they have had some really good promos lately. They do have a TON of tourneys and the options you have with them are awesome. I've tried FT and didn't really feel comfortable there. Maybe it's just personal preference, but i really enjoy playing at PS...just my 2 cents

Link to post
Share on other sites
UTAH GIMME TWO!!
I've been in the service for 22 years, I've fired my piece 19 times in the line of duty, and I don't see what a blind man diving for bricks at the bottom of a pool has got to do with being a secret agent.. On top of that I've been partnered up with some Quanico (sp) Cat.. Some quarterback punk.. Johhny Unitas or something...^^probably not all correct, but you get the idea
Link to post
Share on other sites
Stars. It's not a complex puzzle.
:heart:Am I wrong in saying that FTP doesn't give you a timebank? You have like 15-20 seconds to make your decision, and can never go over? This is another reason why Stars is better (60 second timebank which you can use whenever, but doesn't replenish).
Link to post
Share on other sites
Stars. You can put teh [sic] custom hot chick background (Jessica Alba). I wish both would add Chinese Poker.
Why would you want to play chinese poker with a rake? It's a game with no real skill. I've got a coin you can flip and you can give me a percentage as the rake. Deal?
Link to post
Share on other sites
What is this cash out you speak of?
qft wtf is this ??
Didn't PS just sign somebody new? I think I heard that they did.
yes but he didnt even win a bracelet this year .. so hes obv no good :club: i prefer FTP > stars for jsut about everything but my money seems to last longer on stars . and stars sng takes wayy to long to finish but i like to goof around on them from time to time . id say split up the roll and see which site fits better for you gl
Link to post
Share on other sites

Both sites are rigged, obv.Stars is more riggeder.That being said, I play on both, but mainly FTP, and if i had to choose just one, it would be Full Tilt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Am I wrong in saying that FTP doesn't give you a timebank? You have like 15-20 seconds to make your decision, and can never go over? This is another reason why Stars is better (60 second timebank which you can use whenever, but doesn't replenish).
FTP has added the timebank now.I prefer FTP anyway for the rakeback. 27% is too good to pass up.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...