SeanPhillippi 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 The Mouth Sounding Off"I need my iPod if I'm gonna make it through the day," said Mike Matusow, referring to the slow pace of limit Seven Card Stud Hi-Lo.One of his neighbors wisely cracked back, "So will we."Mike actually left the table to drive home and pick up his iPod. lol. Why wouldn't he call someone there to bring it to him? If he lives alone, he could go send someone to pick it up. He could call Daniel and have him pick it up on his way to the RIO. Link to post Share on other sites
EStormOk 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 lol. Why wouldn't he call someone there to bring it to him? If he lives alone, he could go send someone to pick it up. He could call Daniel and have him pick it up on his way to the RIO.Would you stop griping about everything a pro says. Geez, your as bad as that KidPoker dude....sw about DN griping. No sw about you running your mouth to much, I mean you are doing what you say he is doing. Let it go! Link to post Share on other sites
SeanPhillippi 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Would you stop griping about everything a pro says. Geez, your as bad as that KidPoker dude....sw about DN griping. No sw about you running your mouth to much, I mean you are doing what you say he is doing. Let it go!I am not complaining. I am just expressing my opinion. The difference with my posts is that I am responding to what other people are saying. I am not, as Daniel is, espousing the same opinion in a medium that is one way. This board is two ways, so I am having a conversation. Do you really not see the difference? Link to post Share on other sites
AKoffsuit 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 The Mouth Sounding Off"I need my iPod if I'm gonna make it through the day," said Mike Matusow, referring to the slow pace of limit Seven Card Stud Hi-Lo.One of his neighbors wisely cracked back, "So will we."Mike actually left the table to drive home and pick up his iPod. LOL. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 I am not complaining. I am just expressing my opinion. The difference with my posts is that I am responding to what other people are saying. I am not, as Daniel is, espousing the same opinion in a medium that is one way. This board is two ways, so I am having a conversation. Do you really not see the difference?You understand that a person is free to say whatever he'd like to in his blog?Also, there is a forum for people to respond to what he says in his blog...Stop being a troll, please. Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 The Mouth Sounding Off"I need my iPod if I'm gonna make it through the day," said Mike Matusow, referring to the slow pace of limit Seven Card Stud Hi-Lo.One of his neighbors wisely cracked back, "So will we."Mike actually left the table to drive home and pick up his iPod. Classic. I wonder why the officials can't do a last minute adjustment to the structure? Does Harrah's not say that the tournaments can be altered at any time for any reason? Surely they have enough time to fix the rest of these from this day forward. It doesn't sound like anyone really likes them. Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 You understand that a person is free to say whatever he'd like to in his blog?Also, there is a forum for people to respond to what he says in his blog...Stop being a troll, please.+1 Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 7:20 PM - "Shockinh but true. I skipped the entire first and second level and started with 5710! Only cost me 290 in useless chips."7:25 PM - "At ny table: random central"lmao.Hope he brought plenty of veggie coffee Link to post Share on other sites
Miguel McHarris 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Let's take a moment and think about checky. Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Holy crap. I'm gone an hour and nothing has happened??? Link to post Share on other sites
BellaireDrew 2 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 9:14 PM - "Half my table must think this is stud hi lol" Link to post Share on other sites
KULLMANN 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Still at home and the tournament started an hour ago. I've probably lost like $100 in chips by now and "only" have about 5900 lol. I'm probably going to skip the first two levels that are a time waster and show up at around 7:15 if not 10:30pm. Worst structures in WSOP history...Daniel - You ***** about structures more then anyone else. You are one of the best players in the game. Just play poker. Link to post Share on other sites
Ben_G 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Sounds like a great table DN tid Link to post Share on other sites
xmykro 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 9:11 PM - "Then I'm up against K5 and 9 10. Cap on 4 bet hard all the way. I started 2347... Made 2 7 and scooped lol"9:18 PM - "9350 on dinner break" Hopefully, he stays at the same table for the whole night. Link to post Share on other sites
Flushgarden 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 DN you should be happy the structure is so slow...it allows for more play, and you are obviously better that almost anyone there. It cuts down on the luck factor and gives skilled player such as yourself more of an advantage. Link to post Share on other sites
SeanPhillippi 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 You understand that a person is free to say whatever he'd like to in his blog?Also, there is a forum for people to respond to what he says in his blog...Stop being a troll, please.You just don't get it. I also noticed that since you cannot rebut what I said you have resorted to the childish response of calling me a name. The blogs, both written and video, are one way mediams. This forum is a two way medium. I am not saying Daniel cannot say whatever he wants. I am expressing my opinion that I wish he would stop rehashing the same subject over and over again. You don't like me expressing my opinion and then express your displeasure with critiquing what Daniel has said, which is hypocritical. Since you cannot rebut this post in an intelligent manner, and since this post will create cognitive dissidence in your head, I predict you will resort back to name calling instead of participating in the free exchange of ideas that I prefer. Link to post Share on other sites
xmykro 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 You just don't get it. I also noticed that since you cannot rebut what I said you have resorted to the childish response of calling me a name. The blogs, both written and video, are one way mediams. This forum is a two way medium. I am not saying Daniel cannot say whatever he wants. I am expressing my opinion that I wish he would stop rehashing the same subject over and over again. You don't like me expressing my opinion and then express your displeasure with critiquing what Daniel has said, which is hypocritical. Since you cannot rebut this post in an intelligent manner, and since this post will create cognitive dissidence in your head, I predict you will resort back to name calling instead of participating in the free exchange of ideas that I prefer.Why do you care about something so trivial? Let it go already. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,321 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 You just don't get it. I also noticed that since you cannot rebut what I said you have resorted to the childish response of calling me a name. The blogs, both written and video, are one way mediams. This forum is a two way medium. I am not saying Daniel cannot say whatever he wants. I am expressing my opinion that I wish he would stop rehashing the same subject over and over again. You don't like me expressing my opinion and then express your displeasure with critiquing what Daniel has said, which is hypocritical. Since you cannot rebut this post in an intelligent manner, and since this post will create cognitive dissidence in your head, I predict you will resort back to name calling instead of participating in the free exchange of ideas that I prefer.You have made your point already. What is annoying people is your seeming need to get the last word in which is very internet troll like behaviour. The sure way for you to prove that you aren't acting in a troll like way is to not respond to my post. Link to post Share on other sites
EStormOk 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 You just don't get it. I also noticed that since you cannot rebut what I said you have resorted to the childish response of calling me a name. The blogs, both written and video, are one way mediams. This forum is a two way medium. I am not saying Daniel cannot say whatever he wants. I am expressing my opinion that I wish he would stop rehashing the same subject over and over again. You don't like me expressing my opinion and then express your displeasure with critiquing what Daniel has said, which is hypocritical. Since you cannot rebut this post in an intelligent manner, and since this post will create cognitive dissidence in your head, I predict you will resort back to name calling instead of participating in the free exchange of ideas that I prefer.Uhhhh, Whatttt? :cavemansmiley: Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 You just don't get it. I also noticed that since you cannot rebut what I said you have resorted to the childish response of calling me a name. The blogs, both written and video, are one way mediams. This forum is a two way medium. I am not saying Daniel cannot say whatever he wants. I am expressing my opinion that I wish he would stop rehashing the same subject over and over again. You don't like me expressing my opinion and then express your displeasure with critiquing what Daniel has said, which is hypocritical. Since you cannot rebut this post in an intelligent manner, and since this post will create cognitive dissidence in your head, I predict you will resort back to name calling instead of participating in the free exchange of ideas that I prefer.Or maybe it was that I did respond to your claim by saying there is a forum entitled "Daniel's Poker Blog" where you can respond to his blogs, both video and written, and he posts quite frequently in there, responding to your response... Link to post Share on other sites
Jinzerd 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 so much hostility Link to post Share on other sites
SeanPhillippi 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Looks like DN will make money no matter what happens in the tourney. Didn't take him long to win the 5k off of E-Dog. lol. Link to post Share on other sites
mase_gotsem 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 gl bak 2 bak final tables ? Link to post Share on other sites
xmykro 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Looks like DN will make money no matter what happens in the tourney. Didn't take him long to win the 5k off of E-Dog. lol.Lol. Grinder must have got a cut of that $5,000. He set E-Dog up. Link to post Share on other sites
Ben_G 0 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 9:52 PM - "5 seconds later he explains the bet to Grinder and Grinder says what you mean shuffle? So Eric shows him! Lol"Now thats funny!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now