Standard Calldown?!?!

[mikeysong 0]

Villain is 28.57/20.95/1.11how often do u guys look at wtsd/w$sd?if it helps, 46.67/50 (210 hands @ 10/20)Limit Holdem Ring gameLimit: 10/205 playersConverterPre-flop: (5 players) Hero is UTG with Q K [color:#cc0000]Hero raises[/color], [color:#cc0000]CO 3-bets[/color], 3 folds, Hero calls.Flop: K 3 3 (7.5SB, 2 players)Hero checks, CO checks.Turn: A (3.75BB, 2 players)Hero checks, [color:#cc0000]CO bets[/color], Hero ???

[Moneyball16 0]

Does a player that checks behind with QQ on a K33 flop bet a A turn enough to call down here? I dont think so. What do people think about calling the turn and c/f the river here? I dont think its the best line, but should be discussed along with folding or calling down.

[Zach6668 513]

Screenname of villain?I look at wtsd and w$sd a lot, but I've discovered that 210 hands is not nearly enough to make an assumption based on these stats.Why not bet/fold the turn?

[mikeysong 0]

Screenname of villain?I look at wtsd and w$sd a lot, but I've discovered that 210 hands is not nearly enough to make an assumption based on these stats.Why not bet/fold the turn?

what if i fold a pocket pair?

[Zach6668 513]

what if i fold a pocket pair?

What if he calls down?

[MrNiceGuy 0]

In general, I like c/c, c/c (and bet most rivers if he checks behind on the turn). But, against this opponent (generally passive postflop), c/c, c/f might be a reasonable alternative if my image is ok.I don't like leading the turn because I think villain will fold a lot of pocket pairs that he might bet himself when checked to, or else that he will check behind with and pay off a river bet. Plus, if villain plans on seeing a showdown anyway, he has the option of raising the turn. Also, if villain does have us beat, he might just call. I would only consider betting the turn if I felt I was against the ideal loose-passive, straightforward opponent.