copernicus

This invites players behind, it doesnt shut them out, and gives you no information about the early raiser. Standard 3x raise is the best play here imo.Given the way it was played youre really guessing. You are probably WA/WB which calls for pot control. Check behind on the flop. It does give a free flush draw, but thats better than inflating a pot where you have no clue as to where you stand. If the turn is a blank you can bet if he checks again. If he fires a reasonable bet you can call and not be any worse off than you were betting the flop. Id take the same line if he called a 3x raise.

Yeah, I said skip the SJ bet on todays game. I still love the NJ OU. But -130 on SJ to come back is a great price. what is the "3 way bet" showing money lines on both teams and a tie? 0-0 or 1-1 going into OT for NJ/Car is the way this one may go, and if the 3 way bet includes a tie at 300

The "lock of the day" is NJ/Car under if its at the usual 5/5.5. I cant see that being worse than a 3-2 game.I also like the Van/Stl under. SJ/Anaheim I dont like as much. I don't have a lot of confidence in Hiller yet and think that one could go over fairly easily. I need to find the line on that game because I think SJ bounces back, but it depends on the price. And the price is......awful. -250. skip it.

Gotta love the way the Rangers played today. Except for the last 6 or 7 minutes when they were running around from the Caps intense forecheck, they were disciplined, not giving up any odd man rushes that I remember. They were blocking shots like crazy and making diving plays to knock the puck out of their zone or at least away from the Caps. Ovechkin couldnt get untracked except one huge dinger. And....they stayed out of the box. Still getting outshot by a ton, but Lundqvist is playing lights out as expected.Its not over, but with a split in the Garden I cant see Lundqvist losing 3 in row

Hard to follow...I hope there was no Caps bet....told y'all yesterday to stay away from that game, that anything could happen. If theres a game in that series thats likely to go over its the next one. Rookie goalie plays great and loses by one goal. Washington power play is flat, and he will have all the pressure on him to try and steal a game. Not a good position for a rookie. Meanwhile Ovechkin and the power play finally start to click. I see a 4-2 or 4-3 game as being very possible.I like but dont love the Boston over. Montreal shot their wad keeping it close in game one. Hate the game od

Stl/Van under looks solid if the Blues are bruised. Stay away from Washington/Rangers tomorrow. Anything can happen in that game.

No, but Ovechkin can score. If the Rangers can stay out of the box it will be a good game, otherwise they'll be out of it early and go back to MSG tied.

The penalties were intentional to keep Ovechkin on the ice too long and tire him out ;)And Dubinksy was just doing his Ovechkin imitation, he never expected to pull it off!Its going to be interesting to see if Avery can keep his cool. He's been a target ever since he got back, and he can't get a call from the refs for anything short of boarding him and breaking his back.

Consensus winners:Boston 17-0Caps 16-1Carolina 10-7Pitt 10-7SJS 14-3Det 15-2Van 13-4Chi 14-3

Damn Thrashers! Shouldnt be in the league anyway

Canada only

me too

I dont know what odds line youve got, but you pretty much know the plays I think are overlays based on the line I saw..Chicago for the Conference and the Cup, St Louis for the Conference, Vancouver for the Cup. In the East, Philly and Rangers for Conference and the Cup.

How much is the fee, ill add it. and is the email address posted somewhere?

ditto on paypal or stars, nothing on fulltilt

Its called information, see the post above.

Harder because you cant be sure youre going to get the later round matchups that you like, and it would tend to push picks toward the favorites...but fewer ties with the 2 round and the other Conference championship hard to nail even if you have the ultimate winner.

Again, why would I give you better odds than you can get at a sportsbook, except for the vig? Just beware if you take the Vegas/online odds you are getting way the worst of it.

The East doesnt have a ton of experience in net overall. Biron has seen a ton of shots and those should get cranked down in the playoffs. If they cant slow down your guys then could lose in a long series, but if they get past Pitt I dont see much to challenge them. I only have them 54:43 over Pittsburgh and if it goes to 7 todays game could hurt them. But Ill be just as happy with a Pitt/Rangers conference final

Thats ok. We get Boston in the 2d round and on to the Conference finals...where we lose to some Penn team.

the alive part was touch and go (seriously). The RTE wouldnt go too far agaisnt the med bills anyway lol.the odds I posted are my proprietary methods that have won 8 out of 10 years, 9 out of 12 years...but usually there are some bigger overlays. Ill entertain bets, yes, though obviously Im not laying grossly more than online odds.

Tough year, not many overlays.first number is odds (to one) to win the Conference, second to win the Cup:East:Boston 8.6/20Washington 24.1/81NJ 8.5/16Philly 2.6/6Pitt 4.7/8Carolina 6.3/14Rangers 6.0/15Montreal 65/300Based on one website there are only three decent overlays for the East, Philly at 8:1 and Rangers and Carolina at 15:1. I hate the top 3's chances.For the Cup Philly at 20:1 and Rangers at 40:1.I dont know what the standard site is, those Cup odds look high and the overlays might not even be that good.West:SJS 2.5/5Det 12.2/30Canucks 4.1/10Chicago 3.2

bullshit. His lying goes well beyond standard political spin, and hes not even in office yet.

And once again he shifts like the sands. Last week it was "I will create 2.5 million new jobs", today its "I will create or save 2.5 million new jobs". First, how do you "save" a "new job". And assuming he just misspoke, how do you a prove a job was "saved". Lose 1 million jobs? "Oh without me we would have lost 3.5 million".What a con artist.

80% of the questions could be answered "in between".