-
Content Count
6,119 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by loogie
-
foxwoods pros take on you fishes, plus free advice
loogie replied to FoxwoodsPro's topic in General Poker Forum
Whoa, whoa! Slow down! First you need to define 'noun'. -
I think your main problem lies in that you're physically going to the blackjack tables.But, if you want to stop going there mentally, then you need to find a way to distract yourself. Try picking up a new addiction...like drugs or stripclubs. Whenever you lose early, say to yourself, 'You know what would make me feel better? Drugs and loose women.' Then go do it up.
-
At the games I play they call me Handsome Joel.6 months without a cigarette.
-
What's a blog entry without the words "troubled gay prostitute"?
-
I've never used Neteller.My experience with Firepay has been excellent. No problems.
-
l000gie
-
some people deserve to be spanked by their mothers
loogie replied to Ju And Da's topic in General Poker Forum
First off, that's a really long sentence.Secondly, what were the blinds? That's a pretty big bet. Well, you got what you wanted. That sucks that he caught...but it's going to happen 32% of the time. Sorry to hear about your loss. -
completing in the sb: hypothetical question
loogie replied to Smiff85's topic in General Poker Forum
Let's forget about the numbers and percentages of whether completing with 7/2 off is +EV or not. I'm sure it's not...BUTWhat about this non-math perspective? The entire table limps but the small blind folds, it looks weak. If I'm one of the other players at the table, I'm immediately noting this move from the small blind. This is a player that can be bluffed off the best hand later. He's too focused on odds and math and will see monsters when a well timed bluff is aimed at him.I use math, odds, all that stuff, too. But I also do my best to take advantage of other players when I see recog -
completing in the sb: hypothetical question
loogie replied to Smiff85's topic in General Poker Forum
Um...this is about a 10 handed game isn't it? And I didn't read "limit" anywhere in the original post. If it's 10-handed, no-limit, and a community pot then I'm completing with any two.I haven't learned limit, yet. I'm just a lowly, winning, no-limit mtt/sng player. -
completing in the sb: hypothetical question
loogie replied to Smiff85's topic in General Poker Forum
I'll complete with any two in this situation. After the flop, I'm looking for 2 pair or better to move with my hand. -
Lee's okay with it, because it's not going to cost him any money. The only way it could cost him is if there was so much bad press about this collusion that people stopped playing at his site, which isn't going to happen.Unfortunately, I see no solution to this.....except that whenever someone meets Jerrod or one of his teammates at an event, he should be allowed to punch him in the stomach.
-
This is absolutely cheating and pretty blatant, too.
-
Ok. Yeah, I'd fold that preflop then. If it were like a normal turbo MTT, you need to play these hands in the small blind because of the insane blinds.
-
You're going to have to either wait until you can get your own bank account or find another friend that will spot you. No one will stake you for $20 through the forums most likely. There's not enough return on investment...plus they would probably rather play with that money themselves.
-
Sit and Go? It sounds like an MTT. But then again...what turbo MTT at Ultimate Bet has blinds at only 100/200 with 24 players left? Which tourney is this exactly?
-
I used to work at this movie theater, and they would give me a check each week. My very own money!!!
-
Fold preflop.
-
I agree. His articles have been mediocre at best......but when it comes to Page 2, pretty much every writer is unreadable when compared to Bill Simmons. Too bad his game is blackjack...
-
I doubt that's a bot. It sounds like a very fishy player that will slowplay TPGK and above.However, I am a bot.
-
LOL, thats pretty funny.This whole thread is pretty funny......but have you ever read this thread....ON WEED???
-
I'm an objective observer to this whole debacle.Splash, you are backing out. Your argument to use your personal friend to hold the money makes no sense. Not using an impartial party is cowardly and an obvious 'out' for you. I suggest you reregister with a new name, because you will never live this down....and get this...I'm 27 and have a life.
