Hamlet

ahh, sorry I see you updated the rules.I thought you were updating results.

huh??where?In the firts post I see only way old results!am I missing something?

I dont understand about ectomorph and mesomorph, calories and proteins, and all that crap.... The only thing I know is that PX90 worked for me! thats a great recommnedation talanarI am skinny... super skinny better said. Tried all what you can imagine to build up, but the only thing that really worked was PX90, which btw I did not even buy, I found it somewhere on the web to download for free 45 days ago, I stopped practicing PX90 just to see the change back to skinny mode.

I was thinking on his ruleshttp://10kpropbet.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.htmlIm not native english speaker, .. so, I guess, beside his $10K there is a side bet with someone. Am I right?What do you guys think about the rules of Boku's ChallengeI`m runing the same challenge that Daniel, but I know I am a good sucker at poker.. its been almos 250K hands and Im still with around $10 LOL

dude, how do you do to track his hands? (if not top secret)

I think Im missing an episode.What did Matusow say?

Daniel, in your set of rules you indicate when to go forward. Now that you mentioned "backwards", is there a rule for that situation?

Im not in the group of "computer people", but here in the group of "human people" who know a bit about computers think a bit different. No, just kidding.The thing is that with a computer and a good algorithm you can get only pseudorandom numbers. Pseudorandom is not exactly pure random (or ideal random) because the string of numbers depends on the very firt number and how the arithmetic method arrange the rest. Did I say "the arithmetic method arrange the rest"But, then.. what on this earth can give you pure random to play online poker?I would say pseudorandom is absolutely acceptable for

Would you share the explanation your received with us?