majorleag

Master, so? I don't give a rats ass what his or anyone else's record is.Everyone else defends him like little fanboys.Where is he?And for the other idiot, sorry don't feel like searching for your name. You also have contributed nothing, STFU?Again, how juvenile.So I have received primarily, taunts, jeers, suggestions and a few okay but we will do it at insert any site here but PS.It is not complicated. It will be on PS, with an agreed upon structure, upon an agreed upon schedule by the people that will actually play the damn matches or it won't.I have been willing to put up.Now for the idiot w

Tskillz, modifications are fine if we both agree, but the venue is not.I don't play on UB, Pokerstars is where it will be held.

Aces just for the record I didn't say that Zim backed out.However he was first to make a boast and a challenge that he could beat me.He did not, give any specifics. Just the typical bullshit taunts with nothing behind them.I on the other hand have come up with two challenges with specifics that I am willing to commit to.But "Where is the Batman" sorry but I love that movie and quote and thought it to be very appropriate here.Really though if he doesn't respond then is that backing out? Well I guess technically no since he didn't agree, but it is still pretty chicken shit to talk crap and th

Another very well thought out post.Okay I accept your challenge.I play, you play no hands!Come on are you betting virtual dollars.If you accept a challenge, fine, if you don't fine.But folks, really enough of the silly, juvenile, I can beat you with both hands tied behind my back.I can beat you with my eyes closed.I can beat you without even playing a hand.Etc. etc. etc.Talk is cheap, put up or shut-up!!

Now you say that this is a stupid challenge. You know what is missing from your post?You don't say why, you just say "It's stupid" Now I won't call your challenge stupid I will simply say that I do not believe it is a better measure nor even a very good one.I unlike you will back-up my statement with reasoning. Zim even said that HU is not a good measure, and while I don't agree with much he says I will agree with him on that. The reason I don't believe it is a very good measure of consistency and or skill is that HU can become a crapshoot, like playing roulette. If you play a decent play

Neither does heads up. Read my other responses as to why.Even the great and all knowing Zim feels H/U is not a good measure.

Well this was Zim's boast that he is a Multi-table specialist and would beat me. He also said and I agree with him that H/U is not a good measure.Think about like this if you and I enter the same tourney 10 times and you consistently finish higher, isn't more likely than not that you are a more skilled player?I guess you could have gotten lucky ten times and I unlucky ten times but I don't think so.No matter what format I or you, or anyone else comes up with somebody will shoot holes through it.If somebody wants to come up with a better format by all means, let's hear it.The best format would

8) lol you have a sense of humor, very nice, indeed.

Read some of my other responses.Then come up with a better format!!!Jesus folks, I have heard very few intelligent rebuttals.Most are you are lucky he or she isn't here.He will own you, blah, blah, yada, yada.Talk is cheap, put up of shut up!!!!Bean said he would tear me a new one I believe, well then why has he not responded?I am here. I am ready. I am willing to play.If I lose I will be a stand up guy and concede that I am an inferior player to the winner.

Well this was Zim's boast that he is a Multi-table specialist and would beat me. He also said and I agree with him that H/U is not a good measure.Think about like this if you and I enter the same tourney 10 times and you consistently finish higher, isn't more likely than not that you are a more skilled player?I guess you could have gotten lucky ten times and I unlucky ten times but I don't think so.No matter what format I or you, or anyone else comes up with somebody will shoot holes through it.If somebody wants to come up with a better format by all means, let's hear it.

Now you say that this is a stupid challenge. You know what is missing from your post?You don't say why, you just say "It's stupid" Now I won't call your challenge stupid I will simply say that I do not believe it is a better measure nor even a very good one.I unlike you will back-up my statement with reasoning. Zim even said that HU is not a good measure, and while I don't agree with much he says I will agree with him on that. The reason I don't believe it is a very good measure of consistency and or skill is that HU can become a crapshoot, like playing roulette. If you play a decent play

If it does not happen, it will be because Zim and anyone else that criticizes, only does that and does not play.If accepted I will follow through.Furthermore if I lose I will be a stand up guy and concede that the winner is a better player.Is this the right format? I don't know. Is ten matches enough to decide, probably not but you have to have some limit.1 or 2 is not enough.How many should it be 100, 1,000?Bottomline 10 is probably the only reasonable number to get done in a reasonable amount of time and that would be unlikely for someone to get lucky ten out ten times.

you don't know how lucky you are that AKAconditioner is not around.Let him be around, let him be a square, cause I don't care.The challenge stands!

Yes

I have read a few of the topics today with great amusement.Certainly King was a little Nuts with the CAPS, he sounded whiny, and I certainly don't agree with his assesment that "that's not Poker" because losing to a suck out or bad play sure as hell is a part of poker.Having said that he made a challenge and I made one last week to Zimmer with no response, I would like to see just once the critics accept a reasonable challenge and then have the results posted here.When Daniel is challenged, he either puts up or shuts up. You don't see him get a challenge from Neverwin for example and then fo

So... you don't have a job, you never went to college, and you think you look like a bad ass with your disgusting unwashed mullet. Please stop post here.Come on they allow convicts to use computers in prison now, give the guy a break, he is serving a hard 20!

Oh I am sure he will, but just in case he doesn't since he never loses I am sure some clown will tell him.Tell him talk is cheap!Tell him as soon as he loses the dress and grows some stones the challenge stands!!

What buy in Multi's do you usually play?Everywhere from $20 to the highest available online (Around $200-$350)Okay Zim, here is the challenge if you so choose to accept it. I agree that heads up doesn't mean much, besides I would kick you to the curb like a dog in heads up.We play 10 $10 +1.00 or something close to it on Pokerstars on a schedule mutually agreed upon.Who ever finishes higher, in the best out of ten, transfers $500.00 to other guy.I shouldn't even make such a challenge of course since it is clear to me that you are in the top 1% of all living poker players and I am outmatched.P

What buy in Multi's do you usually play?

Talk is cheap!!Care to make a wager?YES or NO?

So you fashion yourself a Sit and Go specialist do you?Care to make a wager?

Zim I would be happy to play you on PS anytime.

LOL, now Eddie that is probably the most intelligent comment I have ever seen you make.Well done sir, well done.Tell you what folks, screw this, let's just agree to disagree. It is very clear that all of you that have commented are highly successful, high limit pro's that play every hand perfectly.So I think I will go back to getting Nikki's picture and solving the mystery of Smasharoo and not post hands.Let this thread die a quick and painful death!

I am sorry I posted and asked. I had the top set and knew from his previous play he would call.I lose to the ONLY card he can get. Them's the breaks. I know Eddie in your eyes I misplay all my hands. I wonder what your track record is?im sure you "knew" he would call a huge overbetActually Eddie, that is exactly what I am telling you.1. I was at that table and knew how was playing therefore was almost certain he would call that bet.2. It was a cheap qualiifier and if you have ever played those you wold know that people will call with all kinds of hands and draws.So yes I was 98% certain he