TheL0st1ne

The only draw that gets there is a 7.

FYP so i could do this.....[X] FAIL

Since were up against a bad player, i ship it in and lol when he snapcalls with Ax or like KQ.And im he has like AA/KK I claimed it obv rigged and move on.

He's bluffing, you can see it in his wig.

heh, this made me laugh

Reading souls, imoPokerStars Game #21441952595: Tournament #115627277, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2008/10/23 21:22:48 ETTable '115627277 3' 9-max Seat #4 is the buttonSeat 1: wisak7 (1295 in chips) Seat 3: PokerRef (1100 in chips) Seat 4: frightDTD (890 in chips) Seat 6: TheLost0ne (1470 in chips) Seat 7: PuckSniper23 (1300 in chips) Seat 8: Nick_Whiting (3830 in chips) Seat 9: tim_lock (615 in chips) TheLost0ne: posts small blind 15PuckSniper23: posts big blind 30*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to TheLost0ne [Jh Td]tim_lock said, "valid point"TheLost0ne said, "i was gonna insta

QFT, not to mention a whole bunch of...'omg, bet the flop and bet the turn!!!!! why are you checking!!!!'

Am i the only one who thinks this call is just.....atrocious(sp?)On the bubble, 75/150 blinds. Im in the BB with AJ. I only had 1300 to start the hand. The SB had 1500 to start. We are the 2 short stacks.Folds to him he calls. I shove, he calls with 55.I lose.....maybe im just upset that I lost but is his call there not terrible?? Two other stacks were between like 1800-2000 so either of them *could* have gone out. But to call off 85-90% with a small pair like that on the bubble?? Is that bad or am I wrong there? And is my AJ shove standard in that spot?

Yeah i figured its kinda high.i changed it, i did lots of math incorrect while figuring out how many i would have to win the win $XX

Must be nice to run like a god.Not saying youre just getting lucky. Im just saying......you're running like a god. Shit will slow down, just wait.

at least i think thats the spelling.I dont think he was out of line here. I think had he challenged the bet in the first place, he would since he isnt in the hand. But after the TDs get called over I think he has a right to say what he think happened. But I could be wrong.....

Horrible..... 'He never released'?!?!?! WTF is that.And was Losev cursing in Russian there? They were blipping(sp??) out some of what he said. He needs a penalty, imo.

OMG, There have been better Phil Hellmuth quotes this main event than the previous 1 billion years.'another Queen Ten!!!!......He called a raise with a Queen Ten!!!!! I guarantee you I didn't teach you that at camp Hellmuth!!!!''I can't tell him what he really is cause then i'll get a penalty'This. Is. Gold.

I think this is a very good point. Its not like Bax is up against 2 donks who would put their money in with an overpair

If that HH is not edited..........holyfuckingshit

QFT. Scott could easily have the 7. And no, that would not be slowrolling. It would be stupid for him to snap-call phil hellmuth style in this spot. If Bax wasnt in, then yeah, you snap call.

Show me a HH where Quads can be beat by ONE single card.Youre saying 66 on a 4s5s6s7s6x board is an impossible fold??

Sure it is, it is a single seven. Its not look his opponent has to have two specific cards to have him beat. They just need one, and with two players already allin, they could easily have it. Its on youtube somewhere in very poor quality. It was a PAD that put like 5 pros against 1 amateur. The amateur raised in the CO with AQss, and Phil(would only have like 15BBs left) tanked forever and mucked.edit- There you go. Like i said poor quality, the audio is about 4-5 seconds ahead of the video.

lol, now thats funny. Basically bragging about being way out of line. Thats the thing though, sometimes like in your case you already figured him for a bluff...however there are some people who are stupid enough to call simply cause of the comment

Probably because 999 times outta 1000, quads is either the nuts, or VERY hard to beat. bet/folding there after that action is not so sick. If the board was just 4477x on something like that, then yeah sick fold. But not so hard when a simple 7 crushes you, and with two players allin, if you call you are hoping that they just have overpairs.

The player who said 'bluff' on the river, folded UTG preflop.

Yeah how tight some people play on the bubble is so horrible, it really isnt funny. I usually 4-table these things, and usually I would go 4/4 ro 3/4, went 2/4 on one occasion but did very well usually. However, earlier I found out what it is like to run bad in these. Played 4, went like this;I have AK, flop comes J high...I have KK-TT, flop comes Axx. Went out in the 4 with.....22<A5dd allin on turn, 2d3d8xTx, river 7dAJcc<QQ allin on flop of 3c2c2x, i brick66<AQ AIPF, board comes JxxQAAA<AQ allin on Qxx flop, turn Q. This one was on the bubble and crippled me to 1xBBKind of a goo

Seriously, wtf.PokerStars Game #21364615818: Tournament #114752184, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (600/1200) - 2008/10/20 22:47:57 ETTable '114752184 48' 9-max Seat #4 is the buttonSeat 1: Libats (31975 in chips) Seat 2: Jebez666 (19067 in chips) Seat 3: 123punked (33195 in chips) Seat 4: kingof105 (51854 in chips) Seat 5: bogarta (74081 in chips) Seat 6: JUNIORSTYLZ (43328 in chips) Seat 7: SE7E (25646 in chips) Seat 9: flush1t (18148 in chips) Libats: posts the ante 125Jebez666: posts the ante 125123punked: posts the ante 125kingof105: posts the ante 125bogarta: posts the ante 125JUNI

Me too, if he had AK he probably would either muck it, or show both cards. Doubt he would show just the A.

When i wanna play a SnG, I click it and hit the 'register' button. I, along with what I believe is the high percantage of players, dont look in the lobby to see if two players have similar names.