conan776

FWIW, Mason was already complaining about DN's posting during this week's 2+2 Pokercast, for advocating violence. Something, IIRC, about not appreciating him mentioning that Annie Duke getting axe murdered would be no great loss. So he was already on the **** list. :rolleyes:Anyway, DN, I hope you keep posting on 2+2. The rest of us mere (non-mod) mortals know you are just a harmless kitty cat!

$231. I'm gonna be one tabling 50NL for a while. Daniel inspired me.

I thought about it some more. Trying to extend the world of golf to the world of business as the study (PDF) does is almost so common as to be mundane. And there are several reasons this wouldn't necessarily extend to Hold Em.For starters, the study empirically rejects that being in Tiger's foursome has in itself any effect. Of course, the same can't be said for a poker tournament, where having the Tiger-Woods-of-Poker on your table is going to have more of an effect versus having him five tables away.Likewise, who is playing in the tournament and the rankings might be one of the few meta-game

Eh, fair enough.

Huh, well I tried to just mention this to Mr. N on MySpace, but that's a chore.The Tiger Woods EffectInteresting study; thought he maybe could get an article out of it