Jump to content

Stupidhead

Members
  • Content Count

    298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stupidhead

  1. A high beats 9 high. What more do you need to know?
  2. Pretty happy the loose cannon got the lol double from Hellmuth. Definately the best loose cannon they've had so far. Hope he does well next week.
  3. Frankly I'd be more interested in what superjeff has to say on this.
  4. Balancing is a non-issue. It's 2-5 live. People don't pay attention to balancing. Betting shouldn't even be a consideration here. If we didn't have the Kd then it may be a different story, but with the nfd we can play pretty straight forward in this spot. We check. If villain bets, we decide if we want to c/c or c/shove based on the bet sizing. If he checks, we evaluate the turn and decide if we can get some thin value or if we just want to check down.
  5. Shipping to protect our hand seems rly bad. If villain is even capable of folding Ax here c/shoving is so much better.
  6. I'd start by checking and go from there.
  7. Good point. I just like jamming and binking against live players so I can see the explosion afterwards.
  8. Fair enough. Though it's a pretty small portion of everyone's range so it doesn't change things that much. I'd bet closer to 3/4 pot here if I were to lead out. I also think that the 20% number is a bit inaccurate since there are hands that would hit that flop that probably won't even call a flop bet (A2, 54, etc.).I do agree that stack sizes should be factored in.
  9. While we don't get everyone to fold that much on the flop, we win the hand a lot more of the time. If we get calls, we still hit a diamond or A around 22% of the time. And even when we miss there are gonna be plenty of good spots to double barrel. If we had next to no equity in this pot that concept would apply here. But we're always going to have roughly 35%-40% equity no matter what anyone else has. Semi-bluffing with what is likely to be 12 outs does not need to work that much of the time for it to be profitable. If we decide to lead out it would be the intention of 3betting and getting the
  10. I don't expect to get it in as a huge favorite. A lot of the time we'll be flipping, once in a while we'll be dominated, and occasionally we'll run into a tard who will call off light. The problem is that our flat is not going to really show weakness. So villain isn't going to continue bluffing post flop that much with complete air. Those that do are normally monkeys that would get it in with AJo and KQ.Plus we're going to be in a ton of 60/40 situations preflop against hands like 76s and J9s. A typical 4bet commits around 25% (sometimes a bit more) of villain's stack. If we shove, and he knew
  11. I think the opposite is true. If villain is 4betting wide then I'd be 3betting this all day with the intention of getting it in. If he rarely 4bets than I'd be a bit more likely to flat since I don't want to be 3bet/folding a hand this strong. Though if villain is still calling a ton of 3bets wide than I'd still 3bet here.
  12. Hell I don't even understand the OP. Maple Syrup tho.
  13. how the **** did you allow yourself to go below chip average???
×
×
  • Create New...