It doesn't matter who is right or who is wrong. These 7 plaintiffs have a valid point. So does Daniel. The main concern here I think is how Greg R. took a cheap shot at Daniel for voicing his opinion. His opinion is not useless to any degree and Greg R. is no better than anyone else, especially Daniel. Lastly, Greg R. should not say he is the representative of all poker players. Not only is that just not possible, especially without consulting hardly any but also, he is not in any way, shape, or form even close to being an exemplary representative. Look at how he speaks to people in general. D