Jump to content

2AceSuited

Members
  • Content Count

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 2AceSuited

  1. If the 2 of spades came on the flop, how did the winner have 2 black 2's in his hand?
    You got me, though it makes as much sense as the seven-card board, doesn't it? :club:
    Next time I'll use pictures for you, ok? Maybe I'll design a pop-up book and mail it to you, but I will make sure someone walks you through the complicated process of placing your fingers on the tab and then pulling.
  2. I didn't even expect replies. Just needed to vent and couldn't be bothered to create a blog just for bitching.Anyways, yeah ... it couldn't have been 2 black deuces, but he did have Quads.I wasn't pulling people's exact holdings when I said someone cold calling with Ace 2 since obviously that was impossible, but you know what I mean. Well ... judging from some of these replies, no you don't, but I don't care about those people.Point is, for me, I have far greater success elsewhere. InterPoker was my example. I've played 2000 hands there and am currently averaging 5.5 BB/100 and I think that's ok.Ditto bet 365, only a smaller sample size of hands. I seem to get bad beat far more often at PP than anywhere else. Their bonuses and tournaments suck, too. That's another reason I quit playing there.

  3. Yet for another I'll share my favorite line...if you can't beat a bad player, you'll never beat a good one.Also, I refer to PP as an ATM, whenever I need cash, I just go to PP, it's like taking candy from a baby. There are a lot of people that will tell you PP is one of the softest games out there, if not the softest game.
    I find InterPoker's 1/2 extremely soft. I can begin playing two tables with $40 on each and double up on both inside of an hour.
  4. :boohoo: . just so you know, with the coldcallers the guy with 22 had enough in the way of implied odds to cap. dude maybe you just aren't good at poker
    Oh my God. I realized you are 1oo% correct. Thank you for setting me straight. I know he had the correct odds. But the 5 other people in the pot with junk hands like J9 clubs, Q8, Ace 2 ... they didn't. Oh, and to the retard that told me to stop playing .50/1? When PP gave me $20, it was all that was in my account. Maybe I should have gone to a $5/10, posted the blinds, and then gone off to ass bang your mom. Better?Now I'm going to post every bad beat I get handed to me.
  5. I had planned to stay away from the site forever, but they gave me $20, so why not? Let's see if I can crush the ol' .50/1 crowd.First hand ... AK hearts. Hey, off to a good start and I'm UTG+1.UTG raises. I reraise. Half the table calls 3 bets cold. The button caps. So now we have 6 people seeing the flop after a capped pre-flop.It comes down 2 spades, 2 hearts, Ace clubs. Not too shabby. UTG bets. I reraise. One cold caller on my left, button reraises. We all call.Turn is a 7 diamonds. UTG checks, I bet, cold caller folds, button raises, UTG reraises (hm), I fold (someone has me beat), button caps, UTG calls.River is a Queen of diamonds. They cap betting on the river. UTG turns over 77 and button turns over black 2's for 4 of a kind.I know people tell you to be patient, you'll win in the long run. Yeah? Not on that f'ing site. Not for me, anyway. I'm averaging 6 BB per 100 hands overall between Bet 365 1/2 and InterPoker 1/2.I pissed through my $20 from PP in 25 minutes between that hand, and people beating my trips and 2 pair with runner runner flushes and straights. In conclusion, PartyPoker eats ass. Good day.

  6. Maybe you shoulda talked about those "parameters you'd both agree on" first. These are the parameters you set. THIS is your bet. He accepted. Then you tried to reneg on it.  Nah, I didn't agree to the PPT part, because I ahve no idea who the players are on it and he said "sure, that point is moot" etc.But basically, yes.  He agreed.  Whatever, though.  I have no expectation of getting the money or the truth out of him.  Just something to do while I make coffee this morning.
    Heh, yeah. And it gave me something to do while I finish clearing my Interpoker bonus.
  7. Hi.Luck.He's no better than 25 other players who haven't been as luckey lately.Get past this thinking the guy who plays the best wins the most tournaments in the short term.  Not how it works.
    Being a statistics guy and all, you should know how incorrect you are.I guarantee if you select 25 of the players selected to be on the PPT at random, and accumulate their tournament results over the last 3 years, the average winnings per tournament of those 25 won't even be close to lindgrens.ill put 100 on itdeal?
    Maybe you shoulda talked about those "parameters you'd both agree on" first. These are the parameters you set. THIS is your bet. He accepted. Then you tried to reneg on it.Yes?
  8. Pick 25 players invited to the PPT and accumulate their average tournament winnings since the beginning of 2002 against lindgren's average since that date.I don't even kow what the PPT is.  Litterally.  I'll pick 25 people who played tournaments, how's that?
    sure, chances are the 25 you pick are all on the PPT anyway, so i guess that was a moot pointwhere do you get the results of every tournament for these players?thats a website id like to visit
    First page, about halfway down.See where you say "sure"?Tradionally that means yes. Well, at least one good thing will come of this thread. Everyone will realize that you can't be trusted with cash or a the promise thereof or a wager of any kind.That's good to know, I guess.
    now that's what you call verbally backing someone into a corner.And Absolute, usually the person offering the bet works out those perameters beforehand. Now it looks like you're just trying to put together rules that would make you win the bet.
  9. I'd imagine just picking Raymer, Moneymaker, Action Dan, Hellmuth, Ivey, and Doyle could give Smash the win if this was a real bet....which it obviously isn't, seeing how Absolute has been backing out of it.Lindgren is very good. No doubt about it. But is he THAT MUCH better than an Ivey, Greenstein, Doyle, Negreneau, Chan, Farha, etc.?Some days, yes. Some, no. So what's the thing that his given him that edge? Luck.

  10. "Amazing how many posters here are in the money over half the time in SnG's considering the statistic unlikelyhood. It's like 30 people you know winning Powerball or something."Another one I like is ..."Hi guys. I just deposited $100 into Site X and turned it into $1200 in 3 days. What should I do now?"I see those at least once per week. Must be a rush on lucky retards who can't manage a BR. Or liars. Your pick.

  11. saw the same thing at a Foxwoods 4/8 only the other person stopped steaming a lot quicker than this guy did.You could tell what each person had, too. It played out the same way as OP's hand. One guy was playing for the nut flush and the other guy knew it, and had a full house. I think the steaming guy might've put in 8 big bets on the river before he hit that "oh shit" moment.

  12. "I see this as a pro. If you suck, you will realize it faster. Then you either can go about getting better or finding a new hobby when you would have been sucking while one-tabling."Depends. It's a con if you are trying to get better, because you'll go through money quicker than if you one table to gain experience.You could deposit $100 and lose it in a couple hours if you are on 3 or 4 tables at once. That's an extreme, but still...

×
×
  • Create New...