ColeSLaw
-
Content Count
393 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by ColeSLaw
-
-
Continuing to be a good read
-
Select start for 2 players with 30 livesJust start for 1 playerSo both are correct answerSpread is the best weapon by far, though laser was fun too.
-
Well, with an av and sig like that, I wasn't sure.Plus, the fact that you consider 1978 'history' is itself a joke.So I wasn't sure.Not that this adds anything to the discussion on the bill itself.Hope this helps!
-
By history, you mean comedy films from 1978? It's hard to gauge your tone.Teenagers make me laugh. They know nothing about history. -
The Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Today?Didn't they learn from the Japanese that Pearl Harbor bombings don't work out well?There is a whole other aspect to this legislation and that is the international trade litigation between Antigua and the US....The WTO case was about U.S. gaming laws and the Wire Wager Act, which prohibits using phone lines for gambling.A federal court in 2000 ruled that Jay Cohen, president of World Sports Exchange, an online gambling operation based in Antigua, violated the act when his company used the Internet and telephones to transmit calls from bettors in New York to his company in Antigua.The conviction, upheld by the 2nd Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals, was a win for the Justice Department, which maintains that online gambling is illegal, an unregulated temptation for minors and a conduit for money launderers. The U.S., the country accounts for more than half of global consumer spending on Internet gambling.Antigua challenged the law before the WTO in United States — Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services. According to Antigua and Barbuda, the measures at issue may be inconsistent with the US obligations under the GATS, and in particular Articles II, VI, VIII, XI, XVI and XVII thereof, and the US Schedule of Specific Commitments annexed to the GATS.The decision found: three US federal laws (the Wire Act, the Travel Act and the Illegal Gambling Business Act) and the provisions of four US state laws (those of Louisiana, Massachusetts, South Dakota and Utah) on their face, prohibit one, several or all means of delivery included in mode 1 of GATS (i.e. cross-border supply), contrary to the United States’ specific market access commitments for gambling and betting services for mode 1. Therefore, the United States failed to accord services and service suppliers of Antigua treatment no less favourable than that provided for under the terms, limitations and conditions agreed and specified in the US Schedule, contrary to Article XVI:1 and Article XVI:2 of the GATS (i.e. concerning market access);The United States was not able to invoke successfully the GATS exceptions provisions. In this regard, the United States was not able to demonstrate that the Wire Act, the Travel Act and the Illegal Gambling Business Act are “necessary” under Articles XIV(a) and XIV© of the GATS (i.e. “exceptions” provisions, including for public morals) and are consistent with the requirements of the chapeau of Article XIV of the GATS.However the case was appealed and the on 7 April 2005, the report of the Appellate Body was circulated. The Appellate Body reversed the Panel’s finding that the United States had not shown that the three federal statutes are “necessary to protect public morals or to maintain public order”, within the meaning of Article XIV(a); found that the United States’ measures are justified under Article XIV(a) of the GATS as measures “necessary to protect public morals or to maintain public order”; and upheld, albeit on a narrower ground, the Panel’s finding that the United States had failed to show that these measures satisfy the conditions of the chapeau of Article XIV.BASICALLY, SUCH US LEGISLATION MAY VIOLATE U.S. OBLIGATIONS UNDER GATT AND THE WTO. However, they don't get a hoot and trade sanctions would be a long way off even if a new claim was brought based on this legislation.Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!Huh? Why would this be a joke? You're an ***! -
You appear to operate on a whole different level. I don't think it would be worth your skills. Instead, I'll watch the Connie Chung video again and revel in her grunt at 1:58.Hope this helps!
-
damn it!Didn't see that one coming. Good game sir.Can I be your protege?
-
__________|x_|__|_o|_o||__|X_|__||__|__|__|
-
|__|__|_o||__|X_|__||__|__|__|only 22mins left until thread shutdown.. someone play.
-
Well, the easiest two methods are Tritz's Time Goggles software and Party Poker Blackjack, but we were just discussing the free bonus promotion Party is currently running. If you haven't played in a while, they tempt you back with 20, 30, or 40 dollars that has to be cleared with 200-400 hands I think.Have a seat, let me pour you a beverage and I'll tell you all about it.
-
Deepstacks sound tasty! I like mine with syrup, mmmmmmmmh.
-
http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...showtopic=66294Thanks for the software Tritz, a check for your cut is in the mail.
-
I hope it's not the patented Mike the Mouth ritalin strategy.Go Loose Shoe!!!!
-
If only that were possible, *scratch* *scratch*. I think I hear a $220 turbo sng calling.From what I've heard so far, you should definitely cash it out, and fast. -
Do not have a lot of time right now, but wasting much for that very reason.Someone here mentioned party was handing out crack again so I log on and got my $30 rock and donked it up. Basically ran it up and down to nothing and back, peaked at 200 then lost a bunch and was down to 100, then got it back to $240 and had the inner degenerate gambler's monologue of whether to cash it (had cleared the hands by now).Thought I could TP/MM so decided to keep on playing, ran it down to $60 and felt like a complete ***. Just now on complete tilt, I've got it up to $300. I'm quitting and cashing...maybe *scratch* *scratch*... maybe I'll let it sit there for a bit, and there is always the money tree of party blackjack to consider.Let's hear some party free money stories.
-
Nice shout out in the blog. Start another thread with the same title, this time with goatse.
-
I was expecting cheese, but that had me laughing out loud. Kudos. Yelling at the dog and licking your hand were nice touches.
-
Wouldn't be a trademark, it would be a copyright and you already have that as it is copyrighted at creation.Registration is only useful in case of creation disputes.Licensing and profiting from the term are a different matter. I suggest a website selling shirts and mugs, very easy to do.
-
Bob's writing something!Firsts:OH SNAP!
-
maybegreedy
NoBut, maybe at the crab leg buffet.gluttonous -
DAMNIT NOW YOU'VE GONE TOO FAR!THE POLL CLEARLY SHOWS IT IS A JOPKE!they let any johnny cum lately talk shite.. if they made it an exclusive privillege of charter members, I'd be down with that.Man, you are the densest DN applogist I've ever seen, I am getting no benefits as a charter member, as opposed to any other member, though I was promised these benefits when I signed up. That is my point, the total of my point. Chater member ship is a joke, and as you've pointed outdensly and repeatedly , I'm getting the same benefits as any other member. IE there is no difference between me and any otehr member fcp.net, ie charter membership is a joke. -
...stimulating...? ...discussion...?Edit: I don't feel comfortable being a "Poker Forum Nut," can I get a demotion?
-
Wakefield wins by default.Congratulations, wield your title with restraint!
-
The intellectual return was not worth the effort.I'm dropping out and enrolling in the Spademan School of BBQ Flaming.
Time To Show Support For Daniel
in General Poker Forum
Posted