Jump to content

tyfgine

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1,964

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by tyfgine

    card tossing

    in General Poker Forum

    Posted

    I've been doing this addictive card toss thing where the longer you hold down the click, the farther it goes but i can't seem to "get on a roll." Tell me how many you can get if you're bored at work and want to give it a try. [http://www.cardtoss.com][/url]
    Spaaaaaaam.
    Hey, I really am bored at work. Aren't you?
    YES!thanks for giving me something to waste time with, anymore suggestions? :bubblehelp:

    world donkey championship.

    in General Poker Forum

    Posted

    Tuan Le is good, he may gamble a lot, but it's really hard to win 2 WPT events, no?Anyway,I think this might be the first poker tourney with a tie for first, or would it be last? no i guess if its a tournament of donkeys it would be first.Tiffany Williamson and Aaron Kanter O how i wish Williamson called the Sheik with her KJ of Hearts.(how bout that glare she gave him when he didnt show her his hand)as for Aaron Kanter, the designer shirt, shades, and hair speaks for itself.well, all those horrible calls on draws say something too. :?

    dn's toc blog...give me a break

    in General Poker Forum

    Posted

    One of the most transparent shell games is to complain on others' behalfs when the only one who is complaining is the complainer. DN, you are upset YOU weren't chosen as one of the 3 exemptions. You are probably doubly irritated that Bill Fillmaf (I mean Phil Hellmuth) was one of the 3 chosen. Please don't try to make us believe you really think that the folks you mention who earned the right to play in the tourney are really that upset about $500 in lost equity..or having to play against a 3% larger field. Come on...YOU are upset not FOR the others but for yourself.
    ok, the $500 lost equity might not be the biggest part to get upset about, the fact that the field is 3% larger is also not the point.Here is the point: Adding Doyle, Phil, and Johnny does not make the tournament 3% harder to win, it makes it 100% harder. These guys are obviously 3 of the best in the world, and not only are the players who actually qualified for the tournament going to have to make it past the other 100 qualified entries, now they have to make it past three of the toughest opponents in the world, who didn't even qualify for the tournament. What is the point of even having a qualifier? :D:D:D:):club: The point is that they should stick to their own rules of how to qualify, not add some big name players to make a few extra bucks by getting TV ratings.Hey, I'M upset they didnt invite ME!hehe

    "high stakes poker: final day"

    in General Poker Forum

    Posted

    I really wish I could get GSN. I went to their site a while ago. I must have registered on the site, I have no clue why. They sent me a happy birthday email. Kind of funny, since I can't see any of their programming.Anyway, I hope GSN is smart enoght to put their poker shows on DVD. I know I would buy it.Or, maybe they can talk to Brighthouse in Central Florida and get Brighthouse to start airing their channel. I can think of lots of channels I will be more than willing to give up. Like, who watches the Animal Channel anyway? Anyway, I am going to send a letter to my cable company right now instead of complaining on a forum.
    While GSN does have a lot of poker shows, most of them are Celebrities vs. Poker Pro's, or Comedians vs. Poker Pro's etc. The formats usually have a structure where the blinds increase rather quickly too, so its usually not a good game where people are playing great poker, it's more of a rush to see who can gather chips quickly against unskilled players. So, you're not missing anything great, but it is poker on TV nonetheless.
×
×
  • Create New...