fastsilver79

Sorry guys I wasnt reading the forums a few months ago. So i guess i need to go back and read everything from day one. Ill get right on that. lol

What's the deal guys? Just ran across a funny Hellmuth mocking website and thought ppl might find it amusing. Sure this is my first Thread but I've been reading these forums for a couple months and Daniels Blog for like 10 or 11 months. Cut me some slack here.

I was surfing the web and I came cross the nugget. This guy will teach you everything you need to know inorder to be just like (Bill Fillmaff *aka* Phil Hellmuth). This guy has it down to a T. Check out his Secret System Videos.http://www.billfillmaff.com

I understand that you are taking a bigger risk by moving in agianst someone like sammy but the thing is you want to get a call for all your money thats why you make this play agianst sammy if he calls and misses you bust him and win a huge pot in the process. Betting 3/4 of the pot or say does give him the wrong odds but lets say he calls and misses on the turn you bet again giving him the wrong odds and he calls agian. Now he misses the river and will muck his hand giving you no action on the river sure you win a small to medium sized pot but why not either win a small pot on the flop or ma

AK vs 22 is a 50.1 to 49.9 favorite this from Cardplayer.com Texas Hold'em Calulator. But i prefer dueces agianst AK heads up anyday. In Super System 2 Doyle talks about playing the hands in a proposition bet and winning quite a bit of money and the 22's holding up much better.

I get what your saying about keeping the pots small but why only bet a small amout that doesnt give the person the right odds when you can put them to the ultimate test for all there chips. Putting all the money in is the better play because you put maximum pressure on the person and in my opinion thats what the game is all about. when i said its 7:3 i was generalizing its actually 63:37 The thing about betting only say the double the pot is that someone willing to gamble is more likely to call and take a chance while putting all the money in you stand a huge chance of taking the pot right

I totally doubt that anyone would be liking there "chops" to get Daniel in a game. (Daniel = Producer) in any game that is a stretch. So he's having a run of bad cards it happens. From reading his blog he has analyzed his play in a honest fashion not only to himself but everyone else. And if Daniel thinks that he has been playing right he states that and when he makes some bone head play he states that as well. So to think that Daniel is a fish thats a huge stretch. (Daniel+Cold Deck=Negative Results) That's Poker Baby.

Daniel is doing the right thing by putting all his money on the line you have to put the guy to a decision for all his money and when your have the best of it as a 7-3 favorite you want the guy to make a bad or loose call and since you will win that pot so much more. The blind are 300-600 100 ante.

Thats probley what he dressed up for as Halloween.

Sammy's call with the 57 was a very loose call but if you read Super System, Doyle talks alot about getting in there and gambling thats how he plays in a live game. He mentions that the majority of the time he will get all of his money in with the worst of in inorder to win a big pot. "You gotta give give action to get action" or atleast have that image. So Sammy may have read daniel for a big hand but knew if he got lucky he could win a big pot. And Look at how he has been running agianst Daniel even in the Main Event.

There is one thing about this game we are all over looking. It is going to be a TV Series. I have full faith that Daniel knows what he is doing and that he will be fine. But the one thing i ponder is are these players getting any money for there participation or is it just exposure?