Fooditty

My friend took a shitty beat then couldn't get away from AJ. Shit pissed me off. We're so much better then everyone else in these online tournaments its sick.Good luck.

Limping on the button is weak. People are so bad at tournaments.

I'm really not sure why I'm responding to this, but it has me laughing pretty hard so I'll give it a try: Dude, you are comparing apples to Norweigan Frankfurters! When I played at the win I was going all in BLIND. BLIND!!! You call that flipping coins in a 50-50 situation? I'm all in with a random hand in a 10 handed game, and others can wait for a hand like QQ. They get QQ, I get 10-3 off suit. That's a coinflip to you? Man, on second though, why did I even bother replying to this post. It's not that funny at all...Daniel, let me see if I can explain this to you in a way that you mi

Translation: "Come enter the mind of a donkey" 60% , 70% - I think the answer is a resounding yes, every fn time The point is Joe, you can't understand the most simple of mathematics involved in poker so why not let it go before you embarass yourself a little more Ahhh... the single biggest thing that a SKILLFUL player does is get his money in as a favourite. What don't you get about that you muppet. Seriously, how can you be that daft and still operate a keyboard? I'm pretty sure he does understand it and has tried to explain the BIGGER PICTURE so that even people on the short bus with yo

Wasnt a min raise. Wasn't big enough though at all. I love Pot.

Agreed. But did you just find out this word existed?

Are you saying that Todd Brunson never took 20 mil from Beal? What a bluff.Why didnt Ivey play in that game the first time around? well, he was probably 20 years old and killing 200/400 in the AC. Just a thought.I'll agree that is takes a certain disregard for money to play poker, and some people just don't have it.I belive it was 13 million. Also a very large amount, I want to say 10 million was actually the pros money. If you read the book the pros hardly did that well against Beal and even Barry Greenstein said the pros probably had a 1% edge or none at all by the end of it.This guy is

You're wrong. Absolutely wrong. Daniel was making the argument that the better players have the advantage IF the blinds & pots stay small. Then, he goes on to say how he kept on raising people all-in (putting them to a flip). He goes on to explain how great it was for those at the table to be able to play their $2k for a chance at his $150k, and how big of an advantage it was for them because HE was the one taking the big risk. I'm not going to argue with the fanboy nation. Just pointing out the hypocricy. Class dismissed.jNo your wrong. Absolutely wrong. In the nl game nobody has to put

You're wrong. Absolutely wrong. Daniel was making the argument that the better players have the advantage IF the blinds & pots stay small. Then, he goes on to say how he kept on raising people all-in (putting them to a flip). He goes on to explain how great it was for those at the table to be able to play their $2k for a chance at his $150k, and how big of an advantage it was for them because HE was the one taking the big risk. I'm not going to argue with the fanboy nation. Just pointing out the hypocricy. Class dismissed.jNo your wrong. Absolutely wrong. In the nl game nobody has to put

Are you serious. Nobody was shortstacked in the nl game, they were shortstacked compared to him. They had all day to wait for a good hand try to double up as an 80% favorite, how are they at a disadvantage? Please don't be stupid anymore. In the limit game Daniel was shortstacked so they were flipping a coin for the last of the money. If someone with 2000 dollars at a 5/10 nl game decides he has to call a huge rage from daniel with any hand then he is playing poorly in looking to "flip a coin." Please try to understand concepts before posting.

If losin 60/40's really upsets you, you might be in for a bad ride.

If Dreamclown is that much better then if Daniel gets lucky again DC will just break him to a small stack and flip the coin again until he wins. Or is it that he is scared of luck? I better fold my overpair, he could hit is flush. JOPKE.

OMG it was like the coin landed on heads, then flipped to tails at the last minute. EXTREEEEEME DRAMA!

I don't think anyone will ever have a year like the 2004 Daniel had. Allen Cunningham came pretty close this year. But, Daniel's 2004 was like Roger Maris hitting 61. It might get broken, but it'll be a very long time before it happens again.Maybe not as good, but I could use a year like this 14-Nov-02 United States $ 10,000 No Limit Hold'em - Main Event - WPT2002 World Poker Finals, Mashantucket 4th $ 75,650 05-Sep-02 United States $ 1,500 RazzHall of Fame Poker Classic 2002, Las Vegas 4th $ 3,670 03-Sep-02 United States $ 500 Omaha Hi/LoHall of Fame Poker Classic 2002,

He's 85% caues he has a flush draw, and what he is on the turn is meaningless as the money didnt go in. Like thinking 66 "rivering" your ak all in preflop is a bad beat.